The post Hyperliquid’s Co-founder Denies ADL Revenue Destruction Claim appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Jeff Yan denies ADL shifts PnL onto HLP LPs. Mechanism said to protect user and systemic stability. ADL generated user profits in prior events instead. Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan refuted accusations that the Automatic Liquidation mechanism transfers profits and losses to Hyperliquidity providers, asserting that it treats users and providers symmetrically. Jeff Yan’s clarification aims to address community concerns and maintain trust in Hyperliquid’s system, impacting how traders perceive fairness and transparency. ADL Allegations and Jeff Yan’s Defense Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan has confronted allegations suggesting the Automatic Liquidation (ADL) feature unfairly impacts Hyperliquidity Providers (HLPs). This public denial addresses concerns around operational transparency and highlights how ADL’s design supports trader outcomes without favoring liquidity providers. Jeff’s statement emerges amid a backdrop of scrutinized exchange mechanics. The refuted claims were centered on the idea that ADL disproportionately influences financial positions of protocol participants. Hyperliquid has emphasized that ADL’s structure enables balanced treatment across stakeholders and aligns with precedents seen in centralized exchanges. Jeff’s remarks aid in clarifying confusion about the protocol’s revenue structure and stakeholder treatment. Jeff’s assertions have prompted a multitude of reactions from industry leaders. Tarun Chitra described Hyperliquid’s ADL rules as “textbook aggressive,” highlighting potential tensions in decentralized trading dynamics. Conversely, Jeff insists the design offers net benefits for traders and mitigates systemic risk. “The ADL mechanism treats users and HLP symmetrically and does not ‘destroy’ hundreds of millions in revenue.” — Jeff Yan, Founder, Hyperliquid Price Volatility and Market Reactions Did you know? In past events, Hyperliquid’s ADL mechanism has reportedly generated substantial net profits for traders, showcasing a unique balance between protocol efficiency and user benefits. Based on data from CoinMarketCap, as of December 10, 2025, Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE trades at $28.22, reflecting a market cap of $9.50 billion. The 24-hour trading… The post Hyperliquid’s Co-founder Denies ADL Revenue Destruction Claim appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Jeff Yan denies ADL shifts PnL onto HLP LPs. Mechanism said to protect user and systemic stability. ADL generated user profits in prior events instead. Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan refuted accusations that the Automatic Liquidation mechanism transfers profits and losses to Hyperliquidity providers, asserting that it treats users and providers symmetrically. Jeff Yan’s clarification aims to address community concerns and maintain trust in Hyperliquid’s system, impacting how traders perceive fairness and transparency. ADL Allegations and Jeff Yan’s Defense Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan has confronted allegations suggesting the Automatic Liquidation (ADL) feature unfairly impacts Hyperliquidity Providers (HLPs). This public denial addresses concerns around operational transparency and highlights how ADL’s design supports trader outcomes without favoring liquidity providers. Jeff’s statement emerges amid a backdrop of scrutinized exchange mechanics. The refuted claims were centered on the idea that ADL disproportionately influences financial positions of protocol participants. Hyperliquid has emphasized that ADL’s structure enables balanced treatment across stakeholders and aligns with precedents seen in centralized exchanges. Jeff’s remarks aid in clarifying confusion about the protocol’s revenue structure and stakeholder treatment. Jeff’s assertions have prompted a multitude of reactions from industry leaders. Tarun Chitra described Hyperliquid’s ADL rules as “textbook aggressive,” highlighting potential tensions in decentralized trading dynamics. Conversely, Jeff insists the design offers net benefits for traders and mitigates systemic risk. “The ADL mechanism treats users and HLP symmetrically and does not ‘destroy’ hundreds of millions in revenue.” — Jeff Yan, Founder, Hyperliquid Price Volatility and Market Reactions Did you know? In past events, Hyperliquid’s ADL mechanism has reportedly generated substantial net profits for traders, showcasing a unique balance between protocol efficiency and user benefits. Based on data from CoinMarketCap, as of December 10, 2025, Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE trades at $28.22, reflecting a market cap of $9.50 billion. The 24-hour trading…

Hyperliquid’s Co-founder Denies ADL Revenue Destruction Claim

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
Key Points:
  • Jeff Yan denies ADL shifts PnL onto HLP LPs.
  • Mechanism said to protect user and systemic stability.
  • ADL generated user profits in prior events instead.

Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan refuted accusations that the Automatic Liquidation mechanism transfers profits and losses to Hyperliquidity providers, asserting that it treats users and providers symmetrically.

Jeff Yan’s clarification aims to address community concerns and maintain trust in Hyperliquid’s system, impacting how traders perceive fairness and transparency.

ADL Allegations and Jeff Yan’s Defense

Hyperliquid co-founder Jeff Yan has confronted allegations suggesting the Automatic Liquidation (ADL) feature unfairly impacts Hyperliquidity Providers (HLPs). This public denial addresses concerns around operational transparency and highlights how ADL’s design supports trader outcomes without favoring liquidity providers. Jeff’s statement emerges amid a backdrop of scrutinized exchange mechanics. The refuted claims were centered on the idea that ADL disproportionately influences financial positions of protocol participants. Hyperliquid has emphasized that ADL’s structure enables balanced treatment across stakeholders and aligns with precedents seen in centralized exchanges. Jeff’s remarks aid in clarifying confusion about the protocol’s revenue structure and stakeholder treatment.

Jeff’s assertions have prompted a multitude of reactions from industry leaders. Tarun Chitra described Hyperliquid’s ADL rules as “textbook aggressive,” highlighting potential tensions in decentralized trading dynamics. Conversely, Jeff insists the design offers net benefits for traders and mitigates systemic risk.

Price Volatility and Market Reactions

Did you know? In past events, Hyperliquid’s ADL mechanism has reportedly generated substantial net profits for traders, showcasing a unique balance between protocol efficiency and user benefits.

Based on data from CoinMarketCap, as of December 10, 2025, Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE trades at $28.22, reflecting a market cap of $9.50 billion. The 24-hour trading volume stands at $402 million, down 3.56% over the period. Over the past 90 days, HYPE has witnessed a notable decline of 49.11%, indicating significant volatility and market challenges.

Hyperliquid(HYPE), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 02:32 UTC on December 10, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Analysts from Coincu Research note that Hyperliquid’s ADL mechanism’s structure parallels those of major exchanges, aiming for systemic stability. They expect trader-focused protocols to remain appealing amidst growing regulatory attention on liquidation procedures.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/hyperliquid-adl-dispute/

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0.06257
$0.06257$0.06257
-3.84%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Hyperliquid Policy Center’s Concerns Over CLARITY Act– Urges Fixes To Protect DeFi Developers

Hyperliquid Policy Center’s Concerns Over CLARITY Act– Urges Fixes To Protect DeFi Developers

A fresh round of disagreement over the CLARITY Act has revealed ongoing concerns originating from the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), as lawmakers prepare for
Share
Bitcoinist2026/03/28 08:01
How Will XRP Price React After the FOMC Meeting Today?

How Will XRP Price React After the FOMC Meeting Today?

The post How Will XRP Price React After the FOMC Meeting Today? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The U.S. Federal Reserve is set to announce its latest interest rate decision today, and the outcome could have a direct impact on the crypto market, including XRP. Fed Expected to Cut Rates The current Fed funds rate is at 4.5%. Markets are widely expecting a 25 basis point cut, bringing the rate down to …
Share
CoinPedia2025/09/17 23:58
USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

USDH Power Struggle Ignites Stablecoin “Bidding Wars” Across DeFi: Bloomberg

A heated contest for control over a new dollar-pegged token has set the stage for what analysts say could define the next phase of the stablecoin industry. According to Bloomberg, a bidding war unfolded on Hyperliquid, one of crypto’s fastest-growing trading platforms, with the prize being the right to issue USDH, its native stablecoin. The competition drew some of the sector’s most prominent names, including Paxos, Sky, and Ethena, who later withdrew their bid, alongside the lesser-known Native Markets, a startup backed by Stripe stablecoin subsidiary Bridge. Hyperliquid Stablecoin Race Shows Branding and Partnerships Matter as Much as Tech Over the weekend, Hyperliquid’s validators, the contributors who secure the network and vote on key decisions, awarded the USDH contract to Native Markets over the weekend. Despite its relatively new status, the firm’s connection with Stripe helped it outpace more established rivals. Stablecoins underpin decentralized finance by providing a dollar-backed medium for collateral, settlement, and payments across applications. What began as a grassroots, community-led sector has evolved into a battleground for institutions and payment companies seeking revenue from interest on reserves. Circle, for example, shares proceeds from its USDC with Coinbase under a partnership designed to stabilize earnings during market swings. The Hyperliquid contest offered a rare glimpse into just how intense competition has become. Paxos pledged to take no revenue until USDH surpassed $1 billion in circulation. Agora offered to share 100% of net revenue with Hyperliquid, while Ethena put forward 95%. All were outbid by Native Markets, whose ties to Stripe’s $1.1 billion acquisition of Bridge and subsequent rollout of the Tempo blockchain positioned it as a strong contender. “Every stablecoin issuer is extremely desperate for supply,” said Zaheer Ebtikar, co-founder of Split Capital. “They are willing to publicly announce how much they are willing to offer. It just shows it’s a very tough business for stablecoin issuers.” While USDC remains dominant on Hyperliquid with more than $5.6 billion in deposits, the arrival of USDH could shift flows and revenue dynamics. Paxos co-founder Bhau Kotecha said the firm sees the exchange’s growth as an important opportunity, while Agora’s co-founder Nick van Eck warned that awarding the contract to a vertically integrated issuer risked undermining decentralization. Regulatory positioning also factored into the debate. Paxos operates under a New York trust charter and is seeking a federal license, while Bridge holds money transmitter approvals in 30 states. Native Markets, in a blog post, cited regulatory flexibility and deployment speed as reasons for its selection. Hyperliquid said the strong engagement from its community validated the process. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire dismissed concerns over USDC’s status, noting on X that competition benefits the ecosystem. Analysts suggested that fears of centralization may be exaggerated, noting that Hyperliquid is likely to remain neutral and support multiple stablecoins. Still, the contest over USDH highlighted a new reality for stablecoins: branding, partnerships, and business strategy are becoming as decisive as technology. Native Markets Secures USDH Stablecoin Mandate on Hyperliquid Hyperliquid has concluded its governance vote for the USDH stablecoin, awarding the mandate to Native Markets after a closely watched process that drew weeks of community debate and rival proposals. USDH, described by Hyperliquid as a “Hyperliquid-first, compliant, and natively minted” dollar-backed token, is intended to reduce the platform’s dependence on USDC and strengthen its spot markets. Validators on the decentralized exchange voted in favor of Native Markets, a relatively new player backed by Stripe’s Bridge subsidiary, over established contenders including Paxos and Ethena. The outcome followed a string of proposals offering aggressive revenue-sharing terms to win validator support, underscoring the scale of incentives attached to controlling USDH. Hyperliquid’s exchange has become a critical hub for stablecoin liquidity, with $5.7 billion in USDC, around 8% of its total supply, currently held on the network. At prevailing treasury yields, that translates to an estimated $200 million to $220 million in annual revenue for Circle, underlining why a native alternative could be transformative. Hyperliquid’s validators, who secure the network and vote on key decisions, selected Native Markets following an on-chain governance process that concluded September 15. Native Markets has laid out a phased rollout for USDH, beginning with capped minting and redemption trials before expanding into spot markets. Its reserves will be managed in cash and treasuries by BlackRock, with on-chain tokenization through Superstate and Bridge. Yield from those reserves will be split between Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund and ecosystem development. The launch of USDH comes as Hyperliquid records record profits from perpetual futures trading, with $106 million in revenue in August alone, and prepares to slash spot trading fees by 80% to bolster liquidity. Analysts say the move positions Hyperliquid to capture more of the stablecoin economics internally, marking a significant step in its bid to rival the largest players in decentralized finance
Share
CryptoNews2025/09/18 00:48