TLDR VanEck renames its Gaming ETF to target the Degen Economy sector. The new strategy will focus on digital gaming, gambling, and crypto assets. The ETF’s benchmark changes to the MarketVector Degen Economy Index. The new focus reflects growing interest in the Degen Economy and digital assets. VanEck is reshaping its Gaming ETF, renaming it [...] The post VanEck Renames Gaming ETF to Focus on Degen Economy and Digital Assets appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR VanEck renames its Gaming ETF to target the Degen Economy sector. The new strategy will focus on digital gaming, gambling, and crypto assets. The ETF’s benchmark changes to the MarketVector Degen Economy Index. The new focus reflects growing interest in the Degen Economy and digital assets. VanEck is reshaping its Gaming ETF, renaming it [...] The post VanEck Renames Gaming ETF to Focus on Degen Economy and Digital Assets appeared first on CoinCentral.

VanEck Renames Gaming ETF to Focus on Degen Economy and Digital Assets

2025/12/11 01:30

TLDR

  • VanEck renames its Gaming ETF to target the Degen Economy sector.
  • The new strategy will focus on digital gaming, gambling, and crypto assets.
  • The ETF’s benchmark changes to the MarketVector Degen Economy Index.
  • The new focus reflects growing interest in the Degen Economy and digital assets.

VanEck is reshaping its Gaming ETF, renaming it the “VanEck Degen Economy ETF” to better capture the growth of digital assets, gaming, and online gambling. The revamped fund will track the new MarketVector Degen Economy Index, reflecting the rising influence of the “Degen Economy” in global markets. With a streamlined fee structure and a more focused investment strategy, VanEck aims to tap into the growing demand for digital and decentralized financial sectors.

VanEck Adjusts Gaming ETF Strategy, Renaming it Degen Economy

VanEck has decided to make significant changes to its Gaming ETF, renaming it the “VanEck Degen Economy ETF” and updating its investment strategy. The shift is aimed at tracking the emerging “Degen Economy,” a sector encompassing digital assets, gaming, and gambling. This transition comes as VanEck looks to capitalize on the increasing popularity of these digital and online sectors.

The rebranded ETF will focus on companies that are primarily involved in digital gaming, online gambling, and other related areas. The changes reflect the growing economic footprint of the “Degen Economy,” which includes a broad range of businesses such as digital asset exchanges, gaming platforms, and financial services geared toward the millennial generation.

VanEck’s decision to change the ETF’s focus is also an effort to tap into a growing trend among investors who are interested in the intersection of traditional gaming and the crypto economy.

A New Benchmark and Strategy

As part of the changes, VanEck’s Gaming ETF will now track the MarketVector Degen Economy Index, replacing the previous MVIS Global Gaming Index. The new index is designed to reflect the overall performance of companies primarily engaged in the Degen Economy. 

These companies must derive at least 50% of their revenue from digital finance, gig economy services, online forums, or digital sports betting and gaming. The decision to move away from the old benchmark index and adopt a new one signals a broader shift towards the expanding digital asset and gaming markets.

VanEck’s update also includes a change in the ETF’s investment objective. The firm believes this move will better align with the growing interests of institutional and retail investors who are focusing on the digital economy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the new strategy is a direct response to shifting market dynamics, where digital and decentralized finance platforms are increasingly influencing investment trends.

Unitary Fee Structure to Take Effect

In addition to renaming the ETF, VanEck has also announced a change to the fund’s fee structure. Starting on February 1, 2026, the ETF will switch to a unitary fee arrangement. Under this model, VanEck will pay all of the ETF’s expenses, except for the management fee, taxes, and certain other costs.

The management fee will remain set at an annual rate of 0.50% of the fund’s average daily net assets. This change is expected to simplify the ETF’s cost structure and make it more attractive to potential investors.

The new fee structure is part of VanEck’s broader strategy to enhance the ETF’s competitiveness in an increasingly crowded market. By reducing the burden of additional fees on investors, VanEck aims to make the ETF more accessible and appealing to both individual and institutional investors.

Market Response and Future Outlook

The shift in strategy and focus for VanEck’s ETF comes at a time when digital assets and gaming-related investments are gaining traction in the broader financial markets. Experts, such as Bloomberg’s John Boozman, believe this move could set the stage for more ETFs targeting the expanding Degen Economy. With the growing intersection of digital finance, gaming, and crypto, VanEck’s adjustments may align the fund with a growing sector that could see continued investor interest.

In conclusion, by renaming its Gaming ETF and refocusing its strategy on the Degen Economy, VanEck is positioning the fund to capitalize on emerging trends in digital assets and gaming. This move could place VanEck at the forefront of an evolving market, meeting the needs of a new generation of investors interested in digital and decentralized assets.

The post VanEck Renames Gaming ETF to Focus on Degen Economy and Digital Assets appeared first on CoinCentral.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28