Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.

Not Every Web3 Protocol Needs a Native Token

2025/12/11 06:52

When developing a new protocol, the default assumption is nearly always that a new native token must follow. Most blockchains and Web3 frameworks rely on cryptoeconomic systems comprising incentives and penalties to maintain protocol security and deter malicious actors.

\ However, deploying a new Web3 application as a "rollup" or "Layer Two" solution has been common in recent years. Whether implemented as a rollup on Ethereum, a parachain on Polkadot, or a subnet on Avalanche, the primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees.

The Obstacles: Justification for a Separate Token

Currently, the technical challenge of building a blockchain has been significantly mitigated through the availability of numerous SDKs and frameworks. Tools such as the Polkadot SDK and Cosmos SDK allow developers to utilize templates and rapidly launch a functional network, complete with all the standard features one would expect from any standard Web3 protocol.

\ Despite these advancements, a major barrier remains: identity, namely, ensuring we have some semblance of sybil resistance.

\ ==We still need a way to ensure bad actors can’t utterly spam or harm our network, which is most of the main reasons why economic aspects of cryptoeconomic systems like Proof of Work or Proof of Stake exist.==

\ Tokenomics then becomes a subsequent concern: if a project's token model is flawed or poorly conceived, it can undermine the entire effort, regardless of the quality of the underlying technology.

\ The necessity of designing and securing an entirely separate cryptoeconomic network presents a considerable hurdle for developers and startups whose core mission is building a superior, more resilient application or infrastructure, not managing a monetary policy.

\ Fortunately, the landscape is evolving, providing a solution to this complexity.

The Solution: Utilizing the “Parent” Network's Token

If a new protocol builds upon an existing network and deploys as a rollup/Layer Two, they (should) inherently, well, inherit their security from the parent network.

\ This raises a critical question: why not simply use the parent network's native token for all operations? Everything is already set up; we just need to make sure that we can safely perform checks and balances when transferring to and from the parent network. ==In the future, it might be possible to launch a rollup without a token at all, if we solve the Sybil problem, and assuming we have a parent network that provides security for our rollup/service.==

\ Polkadot permits the launch of a “tokenless” parachain. The parachain can instead use the Layer One's token (such as DOT on Polkadot) to facilitate all operations, including transaction fees and security mechanisms.

\ This approach frees up the team to concentrate on ==building solutions and core application logic==. In other words, you focus more on getting your protocol running so you can build your resilient application/infrastructure rather than being bogged down by token mechanics.

A Live Example: EduChain

This concept is not merely theoretical. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team (of which I am a part of!) has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration of this tokenless configuration. It utilizes the parent network’s token, specifically the PAS token on the Paseo testnet, as its functional currency.

\ The EduChain configuration operates via a reserve-backed transfer using XCM, which functions as follows:

\

  • Zero initial supply: the chain commences with a zero total supply of its own potential token. To fund a network account, a cross-chain transfer via XCM must be initiated from the parent network (Paseo).

  • The reserve and the sovereign account: The parachain designates a system parachain (such as the Paseo Asset Hub) as a reserve for the parent token (PAS). Upon the parachain's creation, a specialized account, known as a sovereign account, is automatically generated on the parent chain exclusively for the parachain.

  • Transferring PAS:

  • When a user sends PAS from their account on the parent chain (Paseo) to the parachain (EduChain), the PAS is deposited into the parachain's sovereign account on the parent chain, where it functions as the reserve.

  • Simultaneously, a new, local asset representing PAS is minted on the parachain and credited to the user's account there.

  • When a user sends this local asset back to the parent chain, the local asset is burned on the parachain, and the corresponding PAS amount is unlocked and transferred from the sovereign account back to the beneficiary's account on the parent chain.

    \

This XCM mechanism ensures that every unit of PAS on the parachain is fully backed 1:1 by actual PAS held in a secure reserve on the parent network, thereby eliminating the necessity for a distinct, project-specific token.

\ As a general note, a parachain controls its own local representation of an asset and could, in principle, change those balances according to its own governance. However, Asset Hub — as the reserve location — maintains the canonical reserve‑backed accounting for that asset across the network, and parachains are expected to use XCM instructions via Asset Hub so that this accounting remains correct and consistent.

\ For comprehensive details on EduChain and its operational mechanics, documentation is available at: https://web3educhain.xyz/

Conclusion

This article aimed to highlight the significant potential of delegating the economic and security concerns of a rollup or Layer Two to the parent network itself. By employing reserve-backed XCM transfers, a project can completely circumvent the substantial difficulties associated with launching a new Web3 protocol, allowing the team to dedicate its full effort to building a superior application and addressing real-world problems.

\ Individuals interested in implementing this solution can explore launching a parachain on Paseo, as well as the EduChain repo for more information:

\

  • Parachain Zero To Hero Tutorials
  • Web3 Educhain

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FinanceWire partners with TipRanks to expand financial news distribution

FinanceWire partners with TipRanks to expand financial news distribution

The post FinanceWire partners with TipRanks to expand financial news distribution appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. FinanceWire, the financial press release distribution platform owned by MediaFuse, has partnered with investment research provider TipRanks to bring company announcements directly onto investor-facing platforms, as per the information shared with Finbold on September 19. The integration allows public companies and financial firms to place press releases on stock symbol pages within TipRanks, a platform widely used by individual investors and institutions. The service is already being utilized by firms listed on major exchanges including NASDAQ and NYSE. “This partnership reflects where the industry is headed,” said Nadav Dakner, founder and CEO of MediaFuse and FinanceWire. “Companies want visibility that reaches real investors — not vanity distribution buried in press release feeds. With TipRanks, we’re helping define a new category of press release distribution: targeted, guaranteed, and embedded inside the investor experience.” Uri Gruenbaum, CEO of TipRanks, added:  “FinanceWire is helping reshape how financial news reaches the market. We’re proud to support their mission to deliver verified information to investors more effectively, and to enhance visibility for public companies in a targeted, credible way.” Expanding visibility  According to FinanceWire, its model is designed to differ from traditional wire services by securing placements in high-visibility sections of investor-focused outlets, including TipRanks, Yahoo Finance, MarketWatch, Business Insider, Investing.com, Benzinga, TheStreet, and TradingView.  Rather than being archived in secondary feeds, company announcements appear directly on platforms where investors monitor markets and research stocks. The platform has already been used by multiple companies across global exchanges to distribute press releases within these channels. Featured image via Shutterstock. Source: https://finbold.com/financewire-partners-with-tipranks-to-expand-financial-news-distribution/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 17:19
‘Already seen the low?’ – Inside Cathie Wood’s bet on a new Bitcoin cycle

‘Already seen the low?’ – Inside Cathie Wood’s bet on a new Bitcoin cycle

The post ‘Already seen the low?’ – Inside Cathie Wood’s bet on a new Bitcoin cycle appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin has rarely looked more fragile, and many analysts are already referring to this as the worst fourth quarter on record, marked by a massive leverage wipeout and a steep drop from its all-time highs. For over a decade, Bitcoin [BTC] has followed a harsh, predictable pattern: a Halving event, a commendable rally to new highs, and then a brutal 75–90% crash that resets the entire market. This cycle shaped the crypto world and created the “crypto winter” mentality that traders have come to expect. Cathie Wood challenges the four-year cycle But according to Cathie Wood, CEO and CIO of ARK Invest, those old rules no longer apply. Speaking with Fox Business, Wood made a profound declaration: institutional adoption is actively “disrupting” the traditional Bitcoin cycle. Wood noted that growing participation in U.S. Spot Bitcoin ETFs had started to change how BTC absorbed volatility. She pointed to a steady decline in its two-year volatility trend over the past five years, adding fuel to the idea of a maturing asset. Why Bitcoin’s old pattern may be fading Wood’s view challenges over a decade of beliefs built around Bitcoin’s strict, predictable four-year cycle. The evidence for this cycle is compelling.  For instance, the 2012 Halving saw Bitcoin surge from under $10 to a peak of roughly $1,100; the 2016 Halving fueled a climb from $400 to nearly $20,000; and the 2020 Halving propelled the asset from $8,500 to a record high of around $69,000. Each of these explosive rallies was followed by a painful, defining drawdown of 70% to 85%, resetting the stage for the next run. This predictable pattern, last triggered by the 20th April 2024, Halving, has historically been the sole script for investors. Yet, this time, the narrative feels disjointed and disruptive. What is Wood so concerned about? Wood…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 19:15