Pi Network has found itself back in the news due to a new lawsuit that has been filed against the parent company of Pi, which is named SocialChain Inc. This new lawsuit has been filed by a person, Harro Moen, a citizen of Arizona, who uses Pi. This lawsuit has been brought before the U.S. […]Pi Network has found itself back in the news due to a new lawsuit that has been filed against the parent company of Pi, which is named SocialChain Inc. This new lawsuit has been filed by a person, Harro Moen, a citizen of Arizona, who uses Pi. This lawsuit has been brought before the U.S. […]

Pi Network Faces New Lawsuit Over Alleged Token Losses and Migration Issues

2025/12/11 17:30
  • Pi Network faces a lawsuit claiming $2 million loss from alleged unauthorized token transactions.
  • Lawsuit challenges SocialChain Inc. and founders over Pi token migration and liquidity issues.
  • Case highlights user wallet security and mainnet migration concerns, though success appears unlikely.

Pi Network has found itself back in the news due to a new lawsuit that has been filed against the parent company of Pi, which is named SocialChain Inc. This new lawsuit has been filed by a person, Harro Moen, a citizen of Arizona, who uses Pi. This lawsuit has been brought before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Pi Network Lawsuit Claims $2 Million Loss

The suit charges that SocialChain Inc., Pi Community Company, and Pi founders Nicolas Kokkalis and Chengdiao Fan are liable for substantial losses. Moen alleges that he lost 5,137 Pi tokens in unauthorized transactions from his own wallet.

He further claims that these tokens became valueless, citing a fall from $307.49 to $1.67 per token, which amounts to almost $2 million in lost value. The $307, according to Moen, is “the actual value of Pi” when it was in the early stages of development.

Pi Network Price Claim Disputed

There are also concerns over the reported pricing in the suit. This was clarified by Dr. Altcoin, a crypto researcher, that no token of Pi Network has ever been traded above $3 on a legitimate exchange. The value of $307 was derived from IOU markets where individual Pi currencies were traded despite being warned by the Pi Core Team. This, in essence, isn’t part of the Pi Network ecosystem.

Moen’s allegations of unlawful token transfers are now in question. Analysts suggest that in order for a Pi wallet to be accessed, a person’s personal “passphrase” or “recovery” information, which only the owner possesses, must be used.

There are no legitimate grounds connecting Pi Network officials with access to this particular wallet. Most cases of stolen funds involve either “phishing” attacks, particularly with Pi Network’s transition to a “mainnet.”

Another issue in this lawsuit is the delay in transferring tokens from the former mining application to the main network. Moen claims that “tokens were left illiquid.” Although some users experienced migration delays globally, this does not support a claim of fraud against this company.

Also Read | Solana (SOL) Stalls as Price Remains Locked Between $124 and $145

Pi Network Lawsuit Sparks Concerns

Overall, it seems that the lawsuit has little chance of success, as IOU market prices are beyond the control of Pi Network, according to experts in crypto. However, this suit may cause Pi Network to be more open about their support for those waiting for the mainnet, as well as their token security.

Although it appears that this lawsuit has a low chance of success, it does point to other problems that exist with users of Pi token, including issues with token security and migration. This suit may cause Pi Network to communicate better with users, increasing security to avoid further issues.

Also Read | Litecoin (LTC) Price Analysis: Consolidation Phase Hints at Potential Rally to $160

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21