PANews reported on December 12th, citing DL News, that in a revised paper published on December 5th, Blockstream researchers Mikhail Kudinov and Jonas Nick exploredPANews reported on December 12th, citing DL News, that in a revised paper published on December 5th, Blockstream researchers Mikhail Kudinov and Jonas Nick explored

Bitcoin researchers are focusing on using "hash-based signatures" for quantum-resistant upgrades.

2025/12/12 09:22

PANews reported on December 12th, citing DL News, that in a revised paper published on December 5th, Blockstream researchers Mikhail Kudinov and Jonas Nick explored several methods to upgrade the Bitcoin blockchain to make it quantum resistant. They argue that hash-based signatures are a highly attractive post-quantum solution because their security relies solely on the assumption of a hash function similar to Bitcoin's fundamental design. In an email to the Bitcoin developer mailing list introducing their research, Kudinov stated, "These schemes underwent extensive cryptanalysis during the post-quantum standardization process at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which increases confidence in their robustness."

Hash-based signatures rely on hash functions, mathematical algorithms considered quantum-resistant because, unlike the public-key cryptography used in Bitcoin, hash functions are difficult for quantum algorithms to break. Hash functions can be secured by simply increasing their output size to handle the potential brute-force searches by quantum computers, thus expanding the search space and ensuring the security of applications like digital signatures. However, how developers will implement hash-based signatures is still under discussion. Decisions need to be made regarding issues such as keeping verification costs low, standardizing various hash-based signature implementations, and whether the entire network's history is needed to verify transactions.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.