The public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulatingThe public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulating

Why did MANTRA’s CEO call out OKX?

2025/12/13 22:35
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

The public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulating the OM token’s price, and MANTRA’s chief executive officer (CEO) is demanding transparency about tokens held by the exchange.

The conflict centers on preparations to migrate OM tokens to MANTRA’s new blockchain. But it has reopened wounds from April, when the OM token crashed more than 90% in hours, wiping out over $5 billion in market capitalization.

Why did MANTRA’s CEO call out OKX?

John Patrick “JP” Mullin, MANTRA’s founder and CEO, posted an open letter on X, addressing OKX’s concerns about the migration timeline. The letter confirmed that the ERC-20 OM token would be deprecated on January 15, 2026, followed shortly by a chain upgrade and 1:4 token split handled at the protocol level, requiring no user interaction.

But Mullin made a pointed request, asking OKX to disclose how many OM tokens belong to users versus how many sit on OKX’s own balance sheet.

“As part of our commitment to regulatory compliance, it is our longstanding policy to verify the background of any significant movements of OM tokens,” Mullin wrote, later adding, “For this reason, we reiterate our request for OKX to confirm (i) the number of OKX users’ $OM tokens to be migrated and (ii) the number of $OM tokens held by OKX on OKX’s balance sheet.”

On December 8, he characterized OKX’s post on the OM migration as misinformation, containing “factual errors” adding that “OKX’s unilateral creation of specific dates without consultation with MANTRA has caused unnecessary market confusion.”

The following day, the CEO, who has been calling for all OM holders to migrate their tokens to MANTRA, against their own set deadline, mentioned that OKX just responded to them recently for the first time since the April crash.

Exchange hits back with manipulation claims

OKX responded, stating that it was clarifying “the facts, since MANTRA team continues to push a misleading narrative.” It added that it had “identified evidence that multiple connected and colluding accounts used large quantities of OM as collateral to borrow significant amounts of USDT, artificially pushing OM’s price up.”

The exchange said its risk team flagged the abnormal activity and requested corrective action, but the account holders refused to cooperate.

“To contain the risk, control of these related accounts was taken,” OKX said in its statement.

“Shortly afterwards, the OM price crashed. OKX liquidated only a very small portion of OM, yet the sharp price collapse resulted in substantial losses that were fully absorbed by the OKX Security Fund.”

The exchange said it has submitted full evidence and documentation to regulators and law enforcement agencies, and that multiple litigations are underway. OKX questioned where the unusually large quantities of OM originated and why certain groups controlled such a substantial portion of the token supply.

Observers continue to speculate on April’s event

Taran Sabharwal, CEO of crypto trading firm STIX, offered his analysis of the mechanics behind April’s crash.

He speculated that accounts borrowed USDT against OM collateral through spot margin trading. Supposedly, the accounts went on to use those funds to purchase more OM, which inadvertently drove the price higher. When the price fell below liquidation levels, automatic selling by OKX triggered a cascading effect across multiple exchanges.

The STIX CEO also wrote, “My guess, as a complete outsider, is that JP may be suing OKX to unfreeze the accounts and return the remaining tokens back to him.”

Mullin responded to the speculation post, clarifying his company’s current position with OKX. He stated, “I want to make it VERY clear. Neither MANTRA or myself have ANY ongoing litigation or legal actions ongoing with OKX. This is between them and other larger traders/investors of OM.”

He mentioned that the situation had not been in the public domain until OKX totally misunderstood the migration timeline to MANTRA’s mainnet and put out incorrect information that he had to correct.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01461
$0.01461$0.01461
-0.13%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Price Prediction March Update: Ripple and Aave Consolidate While DeepSnitch AI Surges 170%+ and Raises $1.8M

XRP Price Prediction March Update: Ripple and Aave Consolidate While DeepSnitch AI Surges 170%+ and Raises $1.8M

Governance battles and global tensions are rattling crypto at the worst possible time. After a razor-thin 52.6% vote pushed Aave’s new framework forward, traders
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/03/04 00:30
Polkadot Soars 2.3% to $1.555 — What’s Driving This Surge?

Polkadot Soars 2.3% to $1.555 — What’s Driving This Surge?

Polkadot's price surged by 2.3% in a short time. Explore the potential reasons behind this sudden movement and what traders should watch next. The post Polkadot
Share
Coinfomania2026/03/04 00:26
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41