The public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulatingThe public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulating

Why did MANTRA’s CEO call out OKX?

2025/12/13 22:35
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

The public dispute between cryptocurrency exchange OKX and layer-1 blockchain project MANTRA is over a token migration. OKX is accusing coordinated groups of manipulating the OM token’s price, and MANTRA’s chief executive officer (CEO) is demanding transparency about tokens held by the exchange.

The conflict centers on preparations to migrate OM tokens to MANTRA’s new blockchain. But it has reopened wounds from April, when the OM token crashed more than 90% in hours, wiping out over $5 billion in market capitalization.

Why did MANTRA’s CEO call out OKX?

John Patrick “JP” Mullin, MANTRA’s founder and CEO, posted an open letter on X, addressing OKX’s concerns about the migration timeline. The letter confirmed that the ERC-20 OM token would be deprecated on January 15, 2026, followed shortly by a chain upgrade and 1:4 token split handled at the protocol level, requiring no user interaction.

But Mullin made a pointed request, asking OKX to disclose how many OM tokens belong to users versus how many sit on OKX’s own balance sheet.

“As part of our commitment to regulatory compliance, it is our longstanding policy to verify the background of any significant movements of OM tokens,” Mullin wrote, later adding, “For this reason, we reiterate our request for OKX to confirm (i) the number of OKX users’ $OM tokens to be migrated and (ii) the number of $OM tokens held by OKX on OKX’s balance sheet.”

On December 8, he characterized OKX’s post on the OM migration as misinformation, containing “factual errors” adding that “OKX’s unilateral creation of specific dates without consultation with MANTRA has caused unnecessary market confusion.”

The following day, the CEO, who has been calling for all OM holders to migrate their tokens to MANTRA, against their own set deadline, mentioned that OKX just responded to them recently for the first time since the April crash.

Exchange hits back with manipulation claims

OKX responded, stating that it was clarifying “the facts, since MANTRA team continues to push a misleading narrative.” It added that it had “identified evidence that multiple connected and colluding accounts used large quantities of OM as collateral to borrow significant amounts of USDT, artificially pushing OM’s price up.”

The exchange said its risk team flagged the abnormal activity and requested corrective action, but the account holders refused to cooperate.

“To contain the risk, control of these related accounts was taken,” OKX said in its statement.

“Shortly afterwards, the OM price crashed. OKX liquidated only a very small portion of OM, yet the sharp price collapse resulted in substantial losses that were fully absorbed by the OKX Security Fund.”

The exchange said it has submitted full evidence and documentation to regulators and law enforcement agencies, and that multiple litigations are underway. OKX questioned where the unusually large quantities of OM originated and why certain groups controlled such a substantial portion of the token supply.

Observers continue to speculate on April’s event

Taran Sabharwal, CEO of crypto trading firm STIX, offered his analysis of the mechanics behind April’s crash.

He speculated that accounts borrowed USDT against OM collateral through spot margin trading. Supposedly, the accounts went on to use those funds to purchase more OM, which inadvertently drove the price higher. When the price fell below liquidation levels, automatic selling by OKX triggered a cascading effect across multiple exchanges.

The STIX CEO also wrote, “My guess, as a complete outsider, is that JP may be suing OKX to unfreeze the accounts and return the remaining tokens back to him.”

Mullin responded to the speculation post, clarifying his company’s current position with OKX. He stated, “I want to make it VERY clear. Neither MANTRA or myself have ANY ongoing litigation or legal actions ongoing with OKX. This is between them and other larger traders/investors of OM.”

He mentioned that the situation had not been in the public domain until OKX totally misunderstood the migration timeline to MANTRA’s mainnet and put out incorrect information that he had to correct.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
PUBLIC Logo
PUBLIC Price(PUBLIC)
$0.01463
$0.01463$0.01463
0.00%
USD
PUBLIC (PUBLIC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tron Got Rejected at the Trendline and Is Now Rolling Toward Support – Key Level to Watch

Tron Got Rejected at the Trendline and Is Now Rolling Toward Support – Key Level to Watch

TRX/USDT is trading at $0.2810 on March 3, 2026, after failing to hold above its rising channel and facing rejection beneath descending resistance, with analysts
Share
Ethnews2026/03/03 22:06
XRPL Proposal Eyes Hyperliquid-Like Sidechain To Tap $40B Options Market Now

XRPL Proposal Eyes Hyperliquid-Like Sidechain To Tap $40B Options Market Now

TLDR XRPL proposal targets the $40B BTC and ETH options market dominated by Deribit. The plan supports American-style options and margin, with leverage up to 200x
Share
Coincentral2026/03/03 22:18
UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach

The post UK crypto holders brace for FCA’s expanded regulatory reach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. British crypto holders may soon face a very different landscape as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) moves to expand its regulatory reach in the industry. A new consultation paper outlines how the watchdog intends to apply its rulebook to crypto firms, shaping everything from asset safeguarding to trading platform operation. According to the financial regulator, these proposals would translate into clearer protections for retail investors and stricter oversight of crypto firms. UK FCA plans Until now, UK crypto users mostly encountered the FCA through rules on promotions and anti-money laundering checks. The consultation paper goes much further. It proposes direct oversight of stablecoin issuers, custodians, and crypto-asset trading platforms (CATPs). For investors, that means the wallets, exchanges, and coins they rely on could soon be subject to the same governance and resilience standards as traditional financial institutions. The regulator has also clarified that firms need official authorization before serving customers. This condition should, in theory, reduce the risk of sudden platform failures or unclear accountability. David Geale, the FCA’s executive director of payments and digital finance, said the proposals are designed to strike a balance between innovation and protection. He explained: “We want to develop a sustainable and competitive crypto sector – balancing innovation, market integrity and trust.” Geale noted that while the rules will not eliminate investment risks, they will create consistent standards, helping consumers understand what to expect from registered firms. Why does this matter for crypto holders? The UK regulatory framework shift would provide safer custody of assets, better disclosure of risks, and clearer recourse if something goes wrong. However, the regulator was also frank in its submission, arguing that no rulebook can eliminate the volatility or inherent risks of holding digital assets. Instead, the focus is on ensuring that when consumers choose to invest, they do…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:52