While exchange-traded products linked to XRP have attracted substantial capital, that demand has not translated into higher spot prices, largely […] The post WhyWhile exchange-traded products linked to XRP have attracted substantial capital, that demand has not translated into higher spot prices, largely […] The post Why

Why XRP’s Price Isn’t Reflecting ETF Demand

2025/12/15 17:55

While exchange-traded products linked to XRP have attracted substantial capital, that demand has not translated into higher spot prices, largely due to where and how transactions are taking place.

Market analysts say the explanation lies in the mechanics of price discovery rather than a lack of interest.

Public markets, not ETFs, set the price

XRP’s market price is determined on centralized exchanges, not through ETF transactions. Much of the recent ETF-related buying has occurred through over-the-counter channels, where large blocks of XRP can change hands without affecting order books.

As a result, ETF inflows have increased ownership exposure without creating visible buying pressure on exchanges. At the same time, XRP has faced consistent selling activity in public markets, preventing upward price movement.

Analyst Zach Rector noted that when institutional demand remains off-exchange, it can coexist with flat or declining prices on trading platforms where retail activity dominates.

Selling pressure has matched institutional demand

Data from November shows that exchange-based selling nearly matched ETF-related inflows during the same period. While funds flowed into XRP-linked investment products, a similar value of XRP was sold on centralized exchanges as holders converted positions into cash or stablecoins.

This dynamic effectively neutralized upward momentum. According to Rector, price movement typically accelerates only when institutional flows begin interacting directly with exchange liquidity rather than remaining isolated in private markets.

XRP’s volatility history suggests asymmetric moves

Despite recent stagnation, historical data indicates that XRP remains capable of sharp revaluations when conditions shift. In previous periods, relatively modest changes in net demand resulted in large swings in market capitalization.

Rector pointed out that XRP has experienced both rapid expansions and contractions within short time frames, depending on whether flows favored accumulation or distribution. This pattern suggests that once selling pressure eases, price adjustments can happen quickly.

READ MORE:

Why Holding Bitcoin Is No Longer Enough for Public Crypto Firms

Downside scenarios seen as limited by liquidity

From a downside perspective, Rector argued that current market structure makes a deep retracement unlikely without an external shock. Liquidity conditions have improved, and long-term holders appear willing to accumulate during pullbacks rather than exit positions.

He added that buying interest is already visible near established support zones, creating friction against further declines. While short-term volatility remains possible, sustained moves toward previous cycle lows would require a significant deterioration in market conditions.

Market focus remains on flow migration

According to analysts, the key variable to watch is whether ETF-related demand begins flowing into exchange markets. If that shift occurs, the balance between supply and demand would change materially, potentially altering XRP’s price trajectory.

Until then, XRP’s price may continue to lag headlines, reflecting the separation between institutional positioning and retail-driven price discovery.




The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Why XRP’s Price Isn’t Reflecting ETF Demand appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.00000001529
$0.00000001529$0.00000001529
-11.46%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025?

XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025?

The post XRP Price Prediction: Can Ripple Rally Past $2 Before the End of 2025? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The XRP price has come under enormous pressure
Share
CoinPedia2025/12/16 19:22
BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models

The post BlackRock boosts AI and US equity exposure in $185 billion models appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. BlackRock is steering $185 billion worth of model portfolios deeper into US stocks and artificial intelligence. The decision came this week as the asset manager adjusted its entire model suite, increasing its equity allocation and dumping exposure to international developed markets. The firm now sits 2% overweight on stocks, after money moved between several of its biggest exchange-traded funds. This wasn’t a slow shuffle. Billions flowed across multiple ETFs on Tuesday as BlackRock executed the realignment. The iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) alone brought in $3.4 billion, the largest single-day haul in its history. The iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) collected $2.3 billion, while the iShares US Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF (DYNF) added nearly $2 billion. The rebalancing triggered swift inflows and outflows that realigned investor exposure on the back of performance data and macroeconomic outlooks. BlackRock raises equities on strong US earnings The model updates come as BlackRock backs the rally in American stocks, fueled by strong earnings and optimism around rate cuts. In an investment letter obtained by Bloomberg, the firm said US companies have delivered 11% earnings growth since the third quarter of 2024. Meanwhile, earnings across other developed markets barely touched 2%. That gap helped push the decision to drop international holdings in favor of American ones. Michael Gates, lead portfolio manager for BlackRock’s Target Allocation ETF model portfolio suite, said the US market is the only one showing consistency in sales growth, profit delivery, and revisions in analyst forecasts. “The US equity market continues to stand alone in terms of earnings delivery, sales growth and sustainable trends in analyst estimates and revisions,” Michael wrote. He added that non-US developed markets lagged far behind, especially when it came to sales. This week’s changes reflect that position. The move was made ahead of the Federal…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:44