Terraform Labs sues Jump Trading for $4 billion in damages. Backdoor deals allegedly inflated TerraUSD’s value, leading to collapse. Jump Trading defends itsel Terraform Labs sues Jump Trading for $4 billion in damages. Backdoor deals allegedly inflated TerraUSD’s value, leading to collapse. Jump Trading defends itsel

Terraform Labs Seeks $4 Billion in Damages from Jump Trading Over Collapse

  • Terraform Labs sues Jump Trading for $4 billion in damages.
  • Backdoor deals allegedly inflated TerraUSD’s value, leading to collapse.
  • Jump Trading defends itself against claims of illegal crypto profiteering.

The administrator overseeing Terraform Labs’ liquidation has filed a lawsuit against Jump Trading, its co-founder William DiSomma, and former president Kanav Kariya, seeking $4 billion in damages. The suit claims that Jump, alongside its executives, is liable for Terraform Labs’ catastrophic downfall in 2022, which caused a market crash and financial instability throughout the cryptocurrency ecosystem. The suit comes after Terraform Labs, led by founder Do Kwon, collapsed when its algorithmic stablecoin, TerraUSD, lost its dollar peg. This triggered a domino effect, wiping out over $40 billion in value and contributing to the bankruptcy of major crypto lenders.


Also Read: Analyst: DTCC-Canton Network Tokenization Partnership Does Not Affect Ripple (XRP), Here’s Why


Alleged Backdoor Deals and Secret Agreements

According to the Wall Street Journal, the court-appointed administrator, Todd Snyder, accuses Jump of exploiting Terraform Labs’ ecosystem by entering into secret agreements that inflated the value of TerraUSD. These backdoor deals allegedly helped Terraform Labs mislead investors and artificially boost the stablecoin’s credibility, thus exacerbating the crash. Snyder claims that Jump Trading profited massively from the arrangement, resulting in billions of dollars in unjust gains.


The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had previously uncovered the extent of the alleged deal, which saw Jump’s crypto unit, Tai Mo Shan, purchase $20 million worth of TerraUSD in May 2021. In return, Tai Mo Shan received early access to Luna tokens, which were later sold at market value. This transaction, according to the SEC, led to $1.28 billion in profits for Jump Trading and was part of a broader scheme to mislead investors about the stability of the TerraUSD mechanism.


While the SEC fined Tai Mo Shan $123 million, the lawsuit filed by Snyder is much more significant, aiming to hold Jump Trading accountable for its role in what has been described as the largest collapse in cryptocurrency history. Terraform Labs, in its bankruptcy proceedings, has already agreed to pay a massive $4.47 billion in penalties to the SEC.


However, a spokesperson for Jump Trading has dismissed the lawsuit, calling it a “desperate attempt” to shift responsibility from Terraform Labs and Do Kwon. The company has vowed to defend itself vigorously against the claims.


Efforts to Recover Assets and Hold Accountability

Despite the legal battle, progress has been made in recovering assets for creditor compensation. So far, approximately $300 million has been recovered, a small fraction of the billions of dollars lost due to the collapse. The ongoing litigation is expected to have significant implications for the future of cryptocurrency regulations and corporate accountability in the industry.


Also Read: Massive Gains in Crypto: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Fasttoken Lead the Charge


The post Terraform Labs Seeks $4 Billion in Damages from Jump Trading Over Collapse appeared first on 36Crypto.

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.01735
$0.01735$0.01735
-5.55%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21