The post CryptoQuant Sees Signs of Bitcoin Entering Bear Market as Demand Weakens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin has entered a bear market after demandThe post CryptoQuant Sees Signs of Bitcoin Entering Bear Market as Demand Weakens appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin has entered a bear market after demand

CryptoQuant Sees Signs of Bitcoin Entering Bear Market as Demand Weakens

  • Bitcoin demand fell below its long-term trend in early October, a historical bear market indicator per CryptoQuant data.

  • U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs turned net sellers in Q4 2025, reducing holdings by 24,000 BTC or $2.12 billion.

  • Addresses holding 100-1,000 BTC showed sub-trend growth, mirroring pre-2022 bear market patterns, with Bitcoin crossing below its 365-day moving average.

Bitcoin bear market confirmed by CryptoQuant: Demand slowdown and ETF outflows signal price declines. Explore key indicators and potential supports in this analysis for informed crypto strategies.

What Is the Current Bitcoin Bear Market Signaling?

Bitcoin bear market conditions have emerged as demand growth slowed significantly below long-term trends starting in early October 2025, according to a CryptoQuant report. This downturn follows three major demand waves since 2023, fueled by U.S. spot ETF launches, political events, and corporate treasury adoption. The analytics firm notes that such shifts historically precede extended price corrections, with Bitcoin now trading below key technical thresholds.

How Have Bitcoin ETF Holdings Contributed to the Bear Market?

U.S.-based spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) played a pivotal role in the Bitcoin bear market by shifting from accumulation to distribution in the fourth quarter of 2025. CryptoQuant data indicates that combined ETF holdings declined by approximately 24,000 BTC, equivalent to about $2.12 billion at prevailing prices. This marks a stark reversal from the fourth quarter of 2024, when inflows surged and supported robust price appreciation. The report highlights that this cohort, including ETFs and corporate treasuries, drove much of the cycle’s demand, and their weakening growth echoes patterns observed at the end of 2021, which led into the 2022 bear market. Short sentences underscore the data: ETF net selling accelerated in recent months. Large investors accumulated more cautiously. Derivatives indicators also trended downward. Expert analysis from CryptoQuant emphasizes that restored demand is essential for any bullish reversal, a view supported by on-chain metrics showing reduced network activity. Furthermore, the firm’s proprietary indicators, such as spot demand waves, provide historical context—similar slowdowns in prior cycles resulted in 50-70% price drawdowns from peaks.

The broader implications extend to investor behavior. Institutional participants, who once propelled Bitcoin above $126,000 in early October 2025, now exhibit hesitation. CryptoQuant’s report details how addresses holding between 100 and 1,000 BTC—often linked to ETFs and treasury accounts—grew below trend lines. This group accounted for the majority of demand expansion throughout the cycle. As these holders reduced exposure, Bitcoin’s realized price began aligning with bearish historical averages. Realized price, which calculates the value of coins at their last movement, serves as a reliable gauge for market sentiment. In past downturns, it has pinpointed cycle lows effectively.

Technical indicators reinforce the bearish outlook. Bitcoin recently crossed below its 365-day moving average, a threshold CryptoQuant describes as separating bull and bear phases. This crossover, combined with declining derivatives open interest, suggests reduced leverage and speculative fervor. The analytics firm draws parallels to previous cycles where demand peaks preceded multi-month consolidations. For instance, post-2021 demand exhaustion led to a prolonged winter, with prices bottoming near realized price levels.

Market data further illustrates the shift. Bitcoin’s price has fallen 30% from its all-time high of over $126,000, stabilizing around $88,000 as of late 2025. This decline coincides with a record $19 billion liquidation event in October, wiping out leveraged positions and eroding confidence. On-chain analytics from CryptoQuant reveal that while retail interest waned, institutional flows turned negative. The report cautions that without renewed demand drivers—such as regulatory clarity or macroeconomic tailwinds—the Bitcoin bear market could deepen.

Looking at historical precedents, CryptoQuant’s analysis incorporates data from multiple cycles. The 2018 bear market followed a similar demand slowdown, resulting in an 84% drop. More recently, the 2022 correction saw Bitcoin halve from its peak after ETF hype faded. These patterns inform the firm’s projections: intermediate support at $70,000, with a potential cycle low of $56,000—a 55% decline from the high and 36% from current levels. Such estimates are derived from realized price models and cohort behavior, underscoring the data-driven nature of the assessment.

Despite the gloom, CryptoQuant notes that bear markets often present accumulation opportunities for long-term holders. The firm’s methodology relies on transparent on-chain data, including transaction volumes and holder distributions, to avoid speculative biases. This approach aligns with broader industry standards for crypto analytics, as echoed by experts like those at Glassnode and Chainalysis, who have observed parallel trends in network health.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Caused the Recent Bitcoin Demand Slowdown?

The Bitcoin demand slowdown stems from U.S. spot ETF net selling, reduced accumulation by large holders (100-1,000 BTC addresses), and declining derivatives activity, as detailed in CryptoQuant’s Friday report. This marks a departure from three prior demand waves since 2023, with growth now below long-term trends—a classic bear market precursor seen in 2021.

Is the Bitcoin Bear Market Likely to Last into 2026?

Yes, the Bitcoin bear market shows signs of persistence into 2026 based on historical patterns and current indicators like sub-trend demand and ETF outflows, according to CryptoQuant. While intermediate support at $70,000 may provide temporary relief, a deeper correction to $56,000 aligns with past cycle lows, though external factors could accelerate recovery.

Key Takeaways

  • Demand Shift Signals Bear Market: Bitcoin’s spot demand fell below trends in October 2025, ending the cycle’s growth phase and historically leading to price corrections of 50% or more.
  • ETF Outflows as Key Driver: U.S. ETFs reduced holdings by 24,000 BTC in Q4 2025, contrasting sharp 2024 inflows and weakening institutional support.
  • Potential Price Targets: Expect intermediate support at $70,000, with a cycle low around $56,000; investors should monitor on-chain metrics for reversal signs.

Conclusion

The Bitcoin bear market declaration by CryptoQuant underscores a pivotal shift in demand dynamics, with ETF holdings declining and large investor growth stalling below trends. This analysis, grounded in on-chain data and historical cycles, highlights the need for caution amid Bitcoin’s 30% drop from its $126,000 peak. As the market navigates this phase, staying informed on indicators like realized price and moving averages will be crucial. Forward-looking investors may view this as a strategic entry point, positioning for potential rebounds in 2026 and beyond.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/cryptoquant-sees-signs-of-bitcoin-entering-bear-market-as-demand-weakens

Market Opportunity
Belong Logo
Belong Price(LONG)
$0.00479
$0.00479$0.00479
-13.74%
USD
Belong (LONG) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

Gold continues to hit new highs. How to invest in gold in the crypto market?

As Bitcoin encounters a "value winter", real-world gold is recasting the iron curtain of value on the blockchain.
Share
PANews2025/04/14 17:12