The post BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Records Mixed Outlook in Global Ranking appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) attractedThe post BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Records Mixed Outlook in Global Ranking appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Insights: The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) attracted

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Records Mixed Outlook in Global Ranking

Key Insights:

  • The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) attracted $25.4 billion in inflows in 2025 despite a 10% annual decline.
  • Bitcoin ETFs outpaced gold ETFs in capital flows even as gold prices rose 64% during the year.
  • Galaxy Research expects rapid growth in U.S. crypto ETFs, driven by rising institutional access.

The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) recorded strong inflows in 2025 despite a negative annual return.

Notably, the fund ranked sixth worldwide by net flows, outperforming gold ETFs in capital attraction.

Data from the United States shows shifting investor behavior, while Galaxy Research outlined expectations for future crypto ETF growth.

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Draws Strong Inflows During a Down Year

The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF, trading under the ticker IBIT, stood out in global ETF rankings for this year.

As noted, the fund ranked sixth worldwide by net inflows. However, it was the only ETF in the top group that posted a negative return for the year.

IBIT declined by about 10% over the period. Despite this drop, it attracted roughly $25.4 billion in net inflows.

Similarly, other ETFs near the top of the leaderboard recorded gains between 15% and 30%. None matched the ability of BlackRock Bitcoin ETF to raise capital while posting losses.

BlackRock Bitcoin ETF Comparison With Global ETFs | Source: Eric Balchunas

Market analysts pointed to investor behavior as a key factor. Many holders did not reduce exposure during the price decline.

Instead, capital continued to move into the fund for the better part of the year. This pattern differed from past reactions seen during market stress.

Comparisons were drawn to gold’s past performance, where in 2013, the metal’s price fell by 28%.

During that year, the SPDR Gold Shares ETF saw around $25 billion in redemptions. Investors exited positions as prices declined.

In contrast, Bitcoin’s 2025 drawdown was smaller. While Bitcoin slipped by about 10%, BlackRock Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) recorded inflows of a similar size.

Analysts described this as a clear shift in how investors respond to price weakness. Gold delivered a strong performance during the same period as the GLD ETF gained about 64% in 2025.

It marked gold’s best annual performance since 1979. Even with those gains, gold ETFs attracted less capital than IBIT.

The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF outcome suggested a long-term approach from many investors.

Market observers said raising $25 billion in a down year could point to larger inflows during stronger market cycles. They noted that investor patience played a central role.

Bitcoin and Gold Flows Highlight Changing Investor Behavior

The contrast between Bitcoin and gold became a central focus in market discussions.

Gold prices surged, yet capital flows favored Bitcoin exposure through ETF. This trend surprised some analysts given gold’s strong performance.

Institutional investors appeared to view Bitcoin differently than in previous years.

Instead of reducing exposure during volatility, many increased positions. Analysts linked this to greater comfort with regulated investment products.

ETF structures lowered entry barriers for large investors. Custody, compliance, and liquidity concerns were addressed through established platforms.

Gold versus Bitcoin Debate | Source: Shanaka Anslem Perera

This made Bitcoin exposure easier for pensions, endowments, and advisers. Several market commentators noted that allocation models were already shifting.

Pension consultants and registered investment advisers closely monitored ETF flow data. Some models even began treating Bitcoin as a separate asset group.

The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF was often cited in these discussions.

Observers said the fund’s inflows reflected growing acceptance rather than short-term trading activity.

The data suggested Bitcoin was gaining a place alongside traditional assets. Gold remained an important hedge for many portfolios.

However, flow data showed that capital decisions did not always follow price performance.

Galaxy Research Outlines Future Growth For Crypto ETFs

In close relation to the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF outlook, Galaxy Research shared several forecasts related to crypto exchange-traded funds.

The firm expects more than 50 spot altcoin ETFs to launch in the United States in the coming year. Another 50 crypto ETFs could follow, excluding single-coin spot products.

Crypto ETF Prediction | Source: Galaxy Research

These projections followed regulatory approval of generic listing standards.

Galaxy expects this change to speed up product launches in 2026 as the firm said the approval removed several structural hurdles.

Galaxy also projected strong capital inflows. U.S. spot crypto ETF net inflows could exceed $50 billion.

In 2025, these products already generated about $23 billion in net inflows with institutional demand cited as a key driver.

Galaxy stated that adoption could deepen as more products become available. The firm also noted progress among large advisory platforms.

Three major wirehouses lifted restrictions on Bitcoin recommendations. It was added that advisors were allowed to suggest allocations between 1% and 4%.

Galaxy expects the next step to involve inclusion in recommended model portfolios.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/12/20/blackrock-bitcoin-etf-records-mixed-outlook-in-global-ranking/

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.01857
$0.01857$0.01857
+0.32%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14