The S&P 500 is closing out 2025 with its third straight year of gains, locking in a bull market that has now run for 38 months and counting. Since 1958, when theThe S&P 500 is closing out 2025 with its third straight year of gains, locking in a bull market that has now run for 38 months and counting. Since 1958, when the

S&P 500 caps third straight winning year as bull market stretches into 2026

The S&P 500 is closing out 2025 with its third straight year of gains, locking in a bull market that has now run for 38 months and counting.

Since 1958, when the index took its modern form, the S&P 500 has finished higher in three‑quarters of all calendar years. Even more striking, it has delivered 20% or bigger gains in 19 separate years, while posting declines of any size in just 17.

Those long‑term odds line up with what investors are seeing right now. Earnings forecasts point to a double‑digit rise next year, while the Federal Reserve has already cut rates by 1.75 percentage points over the past 15 months and is expected to move lower again.

That backdrop explains why Wall Street projections for 2026 are clustered around another 10% or better advance. Recent trading has not changed that view, with the index spending the last two months moving sideways within 3% of record highs.

Wall Street leans bullish as valuations cool

That stretch of flat trading has played a role in cooling parts of the market. Several AI‑linked stocks lost their sense of inevitability, speculative behavior eased, and pricing pressures relaxed.

The Nasdaq 100 now trades at a forward price‑to‑earnings ratio of 26, which sits a couple of points below its two‑year average. Its valuation premium over the broader S&P is the narrowest it has been in more than six years.

Optimism remains heavy, though expectations are now higher. FactSet shows 57.5% of analyst ratings on S&P 500 companies are marked as Buys, matching the highest level seen since February 2022, a moment that came just before a nine‑month bear market.

Bespoke Investment Group noted that the index’s trailing three‑year return of 87% at its October peak ranks in the top 5% of all such periods on record. History shows gains usually continue after similar runs, but they tend to be far weaker than average.

Election cycles also sit in the background. Some past midterm election years have produced long stretches where prices went nowhere, suggesting muted upside and months of stalled momentum in 2026.

Even so, broad trends never act alone. This year’s 16.2% gain did not come from only a handful of names. The equally weighted S&P 500 has risen 10.7%, though the gap still shows the risk of holding too little exposure to the biggest stocks.

If Nvidia, Alphabet, and Broadcom had finished the year flat, the index’s gain would have been about one‑third lower.

Defense stocks deliver rare high‑risk rally

Away from tech, defense stocks produced one of the market’s loudest moves. The S&P 1500 Aerospace and Defense group, made up of 24 companies, is heading toward a 41% jump, its strongest year since 2013, helped by demand in commercial aerospace.

That return is more than double the S&P 500’s rise and roughly 16 percentage points ahead of the Magnificent Seven, according to data from CNBC.

In Europe, weapons makers such as Rheinmetall, Saab, and Leonardo climbed as governments moved to sharply increase military budgets.

In the United States, established players like RTX and Northrop Grumman logged double‑digit gains, supported by enthusiasm around military spending and projects like the Golden Dome missile‑defense program.

Concerns that President Donald Trump’s administration could push contractors to rein in buybacks and dividends barely slowed investor demand.

But Kratos and fellow drone maker AeroVironment issued mellow outlooks in Q3, and their shares fell hard, pulling AeroVironment down roughly 40% from its October high.

Even after the pullback, Kratos trades near 100 times expected earnings for the next year, while Palantir sits above 190. By comparison, RTX is valued at 27 times earnings, and Lockheed Martin, known for the C‑130 Hercules transport plane, trades at 16.

Get up to $30,050 in trading rewards when you join Bybit today

Market Opportunity
PoP Planet Logo
PoP Planet Price(P)
$0.01804
$0.01804$0.01804
+1.06%
USD
PoP Planet (P) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58
Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance

The post Vitalik Buterin’s Minor Token Sales Underscore Ethereum’s Portfolio Dominance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin recently sold small
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/21 05:14