Ethereum trader loses $50M USDT in address poisoning scam using spoofed address, experts warn.Ethereum trader loses $50M USDT in address poisoning scam using spoofed address, experts warn.

Ethereum Trader Loses $50M in Address Poisoning Scam

What to Know:
  • Trader loses $50M USDT in a scam, alarming the crypto community.
  • Major loss due to address poisoning technique.
  • Urges caution with copy-paste habits in crypto transfers.

An anonymous Ethereum trader lost approximately $50 million USDT in an address poisoning scam after mistakenly transferring funds to a fraudulent address from their transaction history.

The incident highlights the escalating risks of copy-paste transfers in cryptocurrency transactions, emphasizing the need for enhanced user security measures to prevent similar high-value losses.

An Ethereum trader lost $50 million USDT in an address poisoning scam after copying a spoofed address from their transaction history, as detailed by SlowMist and Web3 Antivirus.

The event highlights the risks of copying addresses from transaction histories, causing significant financial loss and increased scrutiny over crypto security protocols.

$50 Million USDT Lost to Ethereum Scam

An anonymous high-value Ethereum trader transferred $50 million USDT to a spoofed address. On-chain security firms SlowMist and Web3 Antivirus provided detailed accounts of the event.

The scam exploited address poisoning, a technique where attackers place look-alike addresses in victims’ transaction histories. The victim mistakenly used this poisoned address, resulting in the loss.

In one of the most expensive “copy-paste” errors in crypto history, a high-volume trader lost over $50 million USDT after falling victim to a sophisticated scam known as “Address Poisoning.”

Crypto Community Reacts to Major Loss

The immediate impact was a massive personal financial loss for the trader, causing ripples through the crypto community and raising awareness about such scams.

The crypto community is particularly concerned about the security implications of such incidents and has urged platform operators to implement more robust safety checks.

Industry experts emphasize operational security, urging users to avoid copying addresses directly from histories, and recommend using verified sources or QR codes.

Previous Scams Cost Over $100 Million

Similar address poisoning scams have caused significant losses before, with over $100 million recorded in 2024. This technique often targets high-value transactions.

Experts suggest that unless preventative measures are enforced, such as stricter wallet address verifications, similar scams could result in further substantial losses in the crypto sphere.

Web3 Antivirus, Security Team, “In one of the most expensive ‘copy-paste’ errors in crypto history, a high-volume trader lost over $50 million USDT after falling victim to a sophisticated scam known as ‘Address Poisoning’.”

Disclaimer: The information on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency markets are volatile, and investing involves risk. Always do your own research and consult a financial advisor.
Market Opportunity
Scamcoin Logo
Scamcoin Price(SCAM)
$0.00083
$0.00083$0.00083
-1.30%
USD
Scamcoin (SCAM) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

OpenVPP accused of falsely advertising cooperation with the US government; SEC commissioner clarifies no involvement

PANews reported on September 17th that on-chain sleuth ZachXBT tweeted that OpenVPP ( $OVPP ) announced this week that it was collaborating with the US government to advance energy tokenization. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce subsequently responded, stating that the company does not collaborate with or endorse any private crypto projects. The OpenVPP team subsequently hid the response. Several crypto influencers have participated in promoting the project, and the accounts involved have been questioned as typical influencer accounts.
Share
PANews2025/09/17 23:58