Over the past months, the BlockDAG project has gained attention due to its aggressive marketing, ambitious promises, and highly publicized presale campaigns. However, alongside this attention, growing concern has emerged within crypto communities — particularly surrounding the alleged involvement of Gurhan Kiziloz and entities linked to him.
Across Reddit and independent crypto forums, users have repeatedly questioned who is actually controlling BlockDAG’s marketing, messaging, and financial direction. While official project representatives have not clearly confirmed leadership structures, community discussions frequently reference Gurhan Kiziloz and WPRO, a marketing agency widely associated with his past ventures.
According to multiple Reddit threads, users claim that Gurhan Kiziloz is either directly involved in BlockDAG’s operations or exerting influence through marketing and promotion channels.
The similarity in promotional style compared to previous Kiziloz-linked projects
Heavy press placements appearing through known WPRO distribution networks
Announcements being released that appear disconnected from actual development progress
While these remain community claims, the lack of clear clarification from BlockDAG leadership has amplified concern rather than resolving it.
One of the most criticized issues was the announcement that the BlockDAG presale would end by the end of January — despite the project reportedly not having completed testnet and still addressing bugs at the time.
Presale deadlines were announced before core milestones were achieved
Technical documentation did not match the urgency of fundraising
Development timelines appeared secondary to promotional momentum
This disconnect is what led many users to draw parallels to previous projects associated with Gurhan Kiziloz, where marketing significantly outpaced delivery.
Another major concern raised on Reddit is the apparent disconnect between public-facing leadership and marketing output. Some users speculate that key figures such as Anthony may not be fully aware of the scope or timing of announcements released through external promotional channels.
In legitimate blockchain projects, messaging, funding, and development are tightly aligned. When they are not, it raises serious governance questions — especially in a presale environment involving public funds.
The issue for many is not just whether Gurhan Kiziloz is officially involved, but whether his historical pattern of aggressive marketing and opaque execution is being repeated.
As a result, community members are urging others to:
Avoid investing until development milestones are verifiable
Be cautious of promotional announcements without technical backing
Research past projects linked to the same marketing networks
A more detailed investigation and timeline analysis covering Gurhan Kiziloz’s broader history and the concerns surrounding BlockDAG can be found here:
https://paragraph.com/@[email protected]/gurhan-kiziloz-why-this-name-is-now-a-red-flag-in-crypto-and-fintech
BlockDAG and Gurhan Kiziloz: Why the Community Is Raising Serious Concerns was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.


