Over the past months, the BlockDAG project has gained attention due to its aggressive marketing, ambitious promises, and highly publicized presale campaigns. HoweverOver the past months, the BlockDAG project has gained attention due to its aggressive marketing, ambitious promises, and highly publicized presale campaigns. However

BlockDAG and Gurhan Kiziloz: Why the Community Is Raising Serious Concerns

2025/12/28 15:43

Over the past months, the BlockDAG project has gained attention due to its aggressive marketing, ambitious promises, and highly publicized presale campaigns. However, alongside this attention, growing concern has emerged within crypto communities — particularly surrounding the alleged involvement of Gurhan Kiziloz and entities linked to him.

Across Reddit and independent crypto forums, users have repeatedly questioned who is actually controlling BlockDAG’s marketing, messaging, and financial direction. While official project representatives have not clearly confirmed leadership structures, community discussions frequently reference Gurhan Kiziloz and WPRO, a marketing agency widely associated with his past ventures.

Community Claims About Involvement

According to multiple Reddit threads, users claim that Gurhan Kiziloz is either directly involved in BlockDAG’s operations or exerting influence through marketing and promotion channels.

These claims stem from:

The similarity in promotional style compared to previous Kiziloz-linked projects

Heavy press placements appearing through known WPRO distribution networks

Announcements being released that appear disconnected from actual development progress

While these remain community claims, the lack of clear clarification from BlockDAG leadership has amplified concern rather than resolving it.

Presale Announcements vs Technical Reality

One of the most criticized issues was the announcement that the BlockDAG presale would end by the end of January — despite the project reportedly not having completed testnet and still addressing bugs at the time.

Community members pointed out that:

Presale deadlines were announced before core milestones were achieved

Technical documentation did not match the urgency of fundraising

Development timelines appeared secondary to promotional momentum

This disconnect is what led many users to draw parallels to previous projects associated with Gurhan Kiziloz, where marketing significantly outpaced delivery.

Leadership Confusion and Transparency Issues

Another major concern raised on Reddit is the apparent disconnect between public-facing leadership and marketing output. Some users speculate that key figures such as Anthony may not be fully aware of the scope or timing of announcements released through external promotional channels.

In legitimate blockchain projects, messaging, funding, and development are tightly aligned. When they are not, it raises serious governance questions — especially in a presale environment involving public funds.

Why the Community Is Warning Others

The issue for many is not just whether Gurhan Kiziloz is officially involved, but whether his historical pattern of aggressive marketing and opaque execution is being repeated.

As a result, community members are urging others to:

Avoid investing until development milestones are verifiable

Be cautious of promotional announcements without technical backing

Research past projects linked to the same marketing networks

A more detailed investigation and timeline analysis covering Gurhan Kiziloz’s broader history and the concerns surrounding BlockDAG can be found here:

https://paragraph.com/@[email protected]/gurhan-kiziloz-why-this-name-is-now-a-red-flag-in-crypto-and-fintech


BlockDAG and Gurhan Kiziloz: Why the Community Is Raising Serious Concerns was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Market Opportunity
WHY Logo
WHY Price(WHY)
$0.000000014
$0.000000014$0.000000014
0.00%
USD
WHY (WHY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.