The post Korea’s digital asset law delayed to 2026 amid stablecoin power struggle appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea delays its Digital Asset BasicThe post Korea’s digital asset law delayed to 2026 amid stablecoin power struggle appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea delays its Digital Asset Basic

Korea’s digital asset law delayed to 2026 amid stablecoin power struggle

South Korea delays its Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 as regulators clash over stablecoin reserves, enforcement powers, and investor protection rules.​

Summary

  • South Korea postponed its Digital Asset Basic Law to 2026 as the FSC and Bank of Korea remain split over stablecoin reserve oversight and licensing powers.​
  • The draft introduces no-fault liability for operators and over-100% reserve backing for stablecoins held at segregated bank or custodian accounts.​
  • The delay prolongs regulatory uncertainty for exchanges, payment firms, and issuers while the ruling party consolidates proposals and pushes a won‑pegged stablecoin agenda.

South Korea has postponed its Digital Asset Basic Law until 2026 as regulators remain divided over stablecoin oversight authority, according to legislative sources.

Lawmakers paused the crypto legislation as the Financial Services Commission and the Bank of Korea continue to clash over control of stablecoin reserves and enforcement responsibilities, creating regulatory uncertainty in one of Asia’s largest cryptocurrency markets.

The Digital Asset Basic Law is designed to serve as the foundation of South Korea’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework. The legislation aims to strengthen investor protection by imposing stricter legal standards on digital asset operators, according to the draft bill.

A key provision would introduce no-fault liability, making operators responsible for user losses even without proven negligence. The draft also requires stablecoin issuers to maintain reserves exceeding 100 percent of circulating supply, held at banks or approved institutions and separated from the issuer’s balance sheet to limit contagion risks.

Stablecoin oversight has emerged as the primary point of contention between regulators. While authorities broadly agree on the need for stronger supervision, they have not reached consensus on the division of responsibilities for reserve rule enforcement and licensing authority.

The disagreements have complicated decisions around enforcement powers and the treatment of reserve assets, prompting authorities to delay the bill rather than advance legislation with unresolved structural issues.

The postponement adds uncertainty for cryptocurrency firms operating in South Korea, including exchanges, payment providers, and stablecoin issuers. The absence of a completed regulatory framework may affect product launches, investment decisions, and operational planning, industry observers noted.

The ruling Democratic Party is working to consolidate several lawmaker proposals into a revised digital asset bill. President Lee Jae Myung has identified a Korean won-backed stablecoin as a national priority, arguing it could counter the dominance of US dollar-linked stablecoins in global cryptocurrency markets, according to statements from the presidential office.

The delayed Digital Asset Basic Law represents the second phase of South Korea’s cryptocurrency regulation. The first phase, currently in force, addressed unfair trading practices in the digital asset sector.

Source: https://crypto.news/koreas-digital-asset-law-delayed-to-2026-amid-stablecoin-power-struggle/

Market Opportunity
Power Protocol Logo
Power Protocol Price(POWER)
$0.34704
$0.34704$0.34704
+6.52%
USD
Power Protocol (POWER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

Detail: https://coincu.com/pr/5-top-crypto-to-invest-in-2025-from-bnb-to-blockchainfx-who-holds-the-crown/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/25 05:30
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00