TLDR China adds interest to e-CNY, steering digital yuan from cash to deposits Shift boosts China’s payment clout and intensifies CBDC competition Coinbase warnsTLDR China adds interest to e-CNY, steering digital yuan from cash to deposits Shift boosts China’s payment clout and intensifies CBDC competition Coinbase warns

Coinbase Warns U.S. Could Lose Stablecoin Edge as China Adds Interest to Digital Yuan

TLDR

  • China adds interest to e-CNY, steering digital yuan from cash to deposits
  • Shift boosts China’s payment clout and intensifies CBDC competition
  • Coinbase warns GENIUS Act curbs could blunt U.S. stablecoin edge
  • Banks seek tougher reward bans as crypto groups push flexibility
  • Outcome may shape innovation, dollar strength, and future flows

A new policy debate has pushed stablecoin regulation back into focus, and it has raised concerns about U.S. competitiveness. Coinbase signaled that proposed changes to the GENIUS Act could weaken the national position as global digital payments expand. The warning emerged as China advanced its digital yuan strategy with a major interest feature.

China’s Digital Yuan Shift Raises Competitive Stakes

China advanced its digital currency plan and introduced interest-bearing features for digital yuan wallets, and this shift created fresh pressure for U.S. policymakers. The People’s Bank of China confirmed that commercial banks will pay interest on e-CNY balances starting in 2026, and this transition moves the currency from digital cash toward a broader deposit model. Officials stated that the change aims to strengthen value storage and cross-border functions, and it may expand China’s role in digital payments.

Coinbase noted that China’s new framework could attract users seeking yield, and this dynamic may reshape the competitive landscape. The development arrived as global platforms continued exploring new settlement tools, and the update positioned the digital yuan as a clearer rival to stablecoin products. Analysts observed that China’s strategy now targets both retail users and banks, and it accelerates its CBDC ambitions.

The shift introduced fresh urgency for U.S. regulators, and it also placed attention on the GENIUS Act debate. Market observers noted that digital currency design choices increasingly influence payment flows, and China’s move highlighted that trend. The change also prompted industry groups to reassess potential gaps in the U.S. framework.

U.S. Stablecoin Debate Intensifies Under GENIUS Act Pressure

The GENIUS Act placed strict limits on direct stablecoin interest, and lawmakers designed the law to maintain regulatory clarity. The current dispute centers on whether platforms may offer indirect rewards, and the outcome could shape future product features. Industry groups argued that expanded limits could hinder U.S. stablecoin growth as rival systems strengthen their offerings.

Coinbase warned that narrowing reward options may reduce stablecoin competitiveness, and internal lobbying efforts added new tension. Banking groups requested a broader interpretation of the ban, and they stated that reward programs could disrupt existing deposit structures. Crypto organizations countered that the sector needs flexible tools, and they urged lawmakers to maintain the current language.

The debate entered a new phase as firms highlighted global pressure, and they stressed that restrictive rules may slow innovation. Coinbase maintained that stablecoin leadership supports dollar strength, and it said policy shifts must consider international developments. Lawmakers now face a decision that may shape the next phase of digital payments.

The post Coinbase Warns U.S. Could Lose Stablecoin Edge as China Adds Interest to Digital Yuan appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.003048
$0.003048$0.003048
-0.87%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

Detail: https://coincu.com/pr/5-top-crypto-to-invest-in-2025-from-bnb-to-blockchainfx-who-holds-the-crown/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/25 05:30
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00