TLDR: Erik Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury and consensus voting power according to Da Hongfei’s claims. Da Hongfei has repeatedly requested transferTLDR: Erik Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury and consensus voting power according to Da Hongfei’s claims. Da Hongfei has repeatedly requested transfer

Neo Co-Founders Clash Over Treasury Control as Da Hongfei Disputes Zhang’s Financial Disclosure Demands

TLDR:

  • Erik Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury and consensus voting power according to Da Hongfei’s claims.
  • Da Hongfei has repeatedly requested transfer of NEO and GAS tokens to multisig addresses since N3 migration.
  • Neo Foundation will release end-of-2025 financial report in Q1 2026 with preliminary figures shared beforehand.
  • Da Hongfei plans to step back from Neo mainnet work on January 1, 2026, to focus on NeoX and SpoonOS projects.

Neo co-founder Erik Zhang has accused Da Hongfei of withholding Neo Foundation financial information. Zhang called for a complete and verifiable financial report from the organization. 

Meanwhile, Da Hongfei responded by stating that Zhang controls the majority of Neo’s treasury funds and consensus voting power. 

The dispute centers on fund custody and governance control within the blockchain project. Da announced plans to release financial figures despite the ongoing controversy between the two co-founders.

Treasury Control and Transfer Delays

Zhang stated that Da Hongfei will reduce his involvement in Neo mainnet operations starting January 1, 2026. 

The co-founder plans to concentrate efforts on NeoX and SpoonOS projects instead. Zhang emphasized the need for transparent financial reporting from the Neo Foundation regarding its operations and fund management.

Da Hongfei countered these claims by pointing to Zhang’s control over treasury assets. In a X post, Da stated that Zhang “controls the super majority of Neo’s treasury” and “dictates the voting of consensus nodes.” 

The response challenged the premise of Zhang’s call for financial disclosure. Da argued that a blockchain project cannot function properly under single-person custody arrangements.

According to Da Hongfei, he has repeatedly requested the transfer of NEO and GAS tokens from Zhang’s personal custody. The proposed solution involved moving these assets to Neo Foundation multisig addresses while keeping Zhang as a key holder. 

However, Da claimed that Zhang “has consistently found excuses to delay this process.” The transfer was reportedly scheduled to complete around the N3 migration timeline but remains pending.

Financial Reporting and Foundation Commitments

Da Hongfei explained his previous silence on custody issues was intended to maintain community confidence. He hoped for an orderly resolution through private discussions. 

However, the public dispute has now forced transparency on these internal governance matters. Da expressed regret for not addressing the situation earlier through public channels.

The Neo Foundation will release an end-of-2025 financial report during the first quarter of 2026. Da committed to sharing preliminary financial figures as they become available before the full report. 

Nevertheless, he clarified that this disclosure should not validate Zhang’s framing of the governance dispute. Instead, the report will demonstrate the actual distribution of project resources and control.

Da Hongfei reaffirmed his commitment to the blockchain project he helped create. He stated that Neo Foundation will maintain strict fiscal discipline given current resource limitations. 

The foundation plans to pursue the treasury custody transfer through all available methods. Da emphasized that neither he nor the foundation will abandon the project or its community despite the ongoing disputes.

The post Neo Co-Founders Clash Over Treasury Control as Da Hongfei Disputes Zhang’s Financial Disclosure Demands appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
NEO Logo
NEO Price(NEO)
$3.605
$3.605$3.605
-4.57%
USD
NEO (NEO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

5 Top Crypto to Invest In 2025: From BNB to BlockchainFX, Who Holds the Crown?

Detail: https://coincu.com/pr/5-top-crypto-to-invest-in-2025-from-bnb-to-blockchainfx-who-holds-the-crown/
Share
Coinstats2025/09/25 05:30
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00