Coinbase's Base network is experiencing tension with longtime builders who claim the Layer-2 blockchain is prioritizing creator coin initiatives tied to Zora whileCoinbase's Base network is experiencing tension with longtime builders who claim the Layer-2 blockchain is prioritizing creator coin initiatives tied to Zora while

Base Developers Raise Concerns Over Zora-Centric Creator Coin Strategy

2026/01/02 04:30
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

The discord points to challenges facing Base as it attempts to balance mainstream adoption with community support.

Builders Voice Frustration Over Platform Support

The Ethereum Layer-2 network has invested heavily in creator coins through its partnership with Zora, a platform that converts social media posts into tradable tokens. This strategy helped Base achieve notable milestones, with daily token creation surpassing Solana in August, generating substantial on-chain activity.

However, developers outside the creator coin ecosystem report feeling overlooked. Jacek, founder of the Degen token project on Base, publicly criticized the network’s selective approach. “We still can’t even get the official Base X account to follow us, let alone acknowledge launches with a retweet or mention,” he stated on X. “Plenty of other projects feel the same way: that if you’re not part of the favored narrative, you effectively don’t exist.”

Source: @jacek0x

Degen was among Base’s early community projects, contributing to the network’s initial growth. Jacek contrasted Base’s response with the immediate support Degen received from Solana’s official accounts and Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz when the project bridged to that network.

Mainstream Creator Launch Highlights Model Challenges

The viability of creator coins faced scrutiny following YouTuber Nick Shirley’s token launch in late December. Shirley gained widespread attention with investigative content about Minnesota daycare fraud that received over 118 million views and was shared by prominent figures including Elon Musk.

His token launch on Zora via Base initially reached approximately $9 million in market value before declining roughly 80% within days. Trading activity came primarily from cryptocurrency traders rather than Shirley’s mainstream audience. Following this outcome, the ZORA protocol token dropped over 4%.

Content creator notthreadguy suggested the result raised questions about the creator coin concept. “If there was ever a time that these content coins, these creator coins were going to work, it was Nick Shirley right here, right now, in this moment. And it just didn’t work,” he observed.

Competition Intensifies as Sentiment Shifts

Base continues processing more than 10 million transactions daily according to network data. However, observers note that sustained builder discontent could benefit competing networks including Polygon, Optimism, Solana, and Sui.

The situation reflects a broader challenge for Base: maintaining relationships with technical builders while pursuing high-visibility creator initiatives. Developers who contributed to the network’s foundation question the incentives for continued development when recognition appears concentrated on specific partnerships.

“At that point, what is the incentive to build on Base?” Jacek asked, expressing a sentiment reportedly shared by other project founders.

SocialFi Market Growth Amid Adoption Questions

Creator coins belong to the SocialFi sector, which merges social media with blockchain-based financial mechanisms. Industry projections estimate the SocialFi market could reach $10 billion by 2033, representing a 17.5% compound annual growth rate from 2025.

The sector faces retention challenges. Friend.tech, a prominent SocialFi platform, saw daily active users peak around 80,000 before falling below 10,000, illustrating difficulties in maintaining engagement beyond initial interest periods. Creator tokens frequently encounter liquidity issues, potentially leaving participants exposed during value declines.

Base’s Zora integration enables content creators to monetize individual posts as tokens. Supporters view this as an alternative revenue model, though critics argue current implementations emphasize speculation over sustainable creator economics.

Network Metrics Remain Strong

Base maintains solid performance indicators despite community concerns. The network’s total value locked stands at approximately $4.7 billion, positioning it sixth among major blockchains. In October 2024, Base’s stablecoin transaction volume temporarily exceeded Ethereum, Solana, and Tron, capturing 30% of market share.

Projects including Aerodrome Finance have established significant presence on Base. The network’s transaction costs consistently remain under one cent, offering cost-effective on-chain operations.

Base creator Jesse Pollak indicated in September that the team is considering a native token, though no definitive plans exist. Such a token could potentially help coordinate incentives between the network and its developer community.

Balancing Innovation and Community

The outcome of Base’s current trajectory remains to be determined. Competing blockchain networks could gain advantages if developer sentiment continues declining. Network success requires more than transaction metrics—it depends on sustaining an engaged, productive builder community.

Base’s creator coin strategy may represent an attempt to bring mainstream adoption to blockchain technology through cultural relevance. However, this approach risks creating divisions if established builders feel their contributions go unrecognized. The network faces the challenge of supporting both innovative experiments and the foundational projects that enabled its growth.

Market Opportunity
Zora Logo
Zora Price(ZORA)
$0.01749
$0.01749$0.01749
+2.05%
USD
Zora (ZORA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Tether Backs Ark Labs’ $5.2 Million Bet on Bitcoin’s Stablecoin Revival

Tether Backs Ark Labs’ $5.2 Million Bet on Bitcoin’s Stablecoin Revival

The post Tether Backs Ark Labs’ $5.2 Million Bet on Bitcoin’s Stablecoin Revival appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Ark Labs secured backing from Tether
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/12 21:44
MySQL Single Leader Replication with Node.js and Docker

MySQL Single Leader Replication with Node.js and Docker

Modern applications demand high availability and the ability to scale reads without compromising performance. One of the most common strategies to achieve this is Replication. In this setup, we configured a single database to act as the leader (master) and handle all write operations, while three replicas handle read operations. In this article, we’ll walk through how to set up MySQL single-leader replication on your local machine using Docker. Once the replication is working, we’ll connect it to a Node.js application using Sequelize ORM, so that reads are routed to the replica and writes go to the master. By the end, you’ll have a working environment where you can see replication in real time Prerequisites knowledge of database replication Background knowledge of docker and docker compose Background knowledge of Nodejs and how to run a NodeJS server An Overview of what we are building Setup Setup our database servers on docker compose in the root of our project directory, create a file named docker-compose.yml with the following content to setup our mysql primary and replica databases. \ \ name: "learn-replica" volumes: mysqlMasterDatabase: mysqlSlaveDatabase: mysqlSlaveDatabaseII: mysqlSlaveDatabaseIII: networks: mysql-replication-network: services: mysql-master: image: mysql:latest container_name: mysql-master command: --server-id=1 --log-bin=ON environment: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: master MYSQL_DATABASE: replicaDb ports: - "3306:3306" volumes: - mysqlMasterDatabase:/var/lib/mysql networks: - mysql-replication-network mysql-slave: image: mysql:latest container_name: mysql-slave command: --server-id=2 --log-bin=ON environment: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: slave MYSQL_DATABASE: replicaDb MYSQL_ROOT_HOST: "%" ports: - "3307:3306" volumes: - mysqlSlaveDatabase:/var/lib/mysql depends_on: - mysql-master networks: - mysql-replication-network mysql-slaveII: image: mysql:latest container_name: mysql-slaveII command: --server-id=2 --log-bin=ON environment: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: slave MYSQL_DATABASE: replicaDb MYSQL_ROOT_HOST: "%" ports: - "3308:3306" volumes: - mysqlSlaveDatabaseII:/var/lib/mysql depends_on: - mysql-master networks: - mysql-replication-network mysql-slaveIII: image: mysql:latest container_name: mysql-slaveIII command: --server-id=3 --log-bin=ON environment: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: slave MYSQL_DATABASE: replicaDb MYSQL_ROOT_HOST: "%" ports: - "3309:3306" volumes: - mysqlSlaveDatabaseIII:/var/lib/mysql depends_on: - mysql-master networks: - mysql-replication-network In this setup, I’m creating a master database container called mysql-master and 3 replica containers called mysql-slave, mysql-slaveII and mysql-slaveIII. I won’t go too deep into the docker-compose.yml file since it’s just a basic setup, but I do want to walk you through the command line instructions used in all four services because that’s where things get interesting.
command: --server-id=1 --log-bin=ON The --server-id option gives each MySQL server in your replication setup its own name tag. Each one has to be unique and without it, replication won’t work at all. Another cool option not included here is binlog_format=ROW. This tells MySQL how to keep track of changes before passing them along to the replicas. By default, MySQL already uses row-based replication, but you can explicitly set it to ROW to be sure or switch it to STATEMENT if you’d rather log the actual SQL statements instead of row-by-row changes. \ Run our containers on docker Now, in the terminal, we can run the following command to spin up our database containers: docker-compose up -d \ Setting Up Our Master (Primary) Server To configure our master server, we would have to first access the running instance on docker using the following command docker exec -it mysql-master bash This command opens an interactive Bash shell inside the running Docker container named mysql-master, allowing us to run commands directly inside that container. \ Now that we’re inside the container, we can access the MySQL server and start running commands. type: mysql -uroot -p This will log you into MySQL as the root user. You’ll be prompted to enter the password you set in your docker-compose.yml file. \ Next, we need to create a special user that our replicas will use to connect to the master server and pull data. Inside the MySQL prompt, run the following commands: \ CREATE USER 'repl_user'@'%' IDENTIFIED BY 'replication_pass'; GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE ON . TO 'repl_user'@'%'; FLUSH PRIVILEGES; Here’s what’s happening: CREATE USER makes a new MySQL user called repl_user with the password replication_pass. GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE gives this user permission to act as a replication client. FLUSH PRIVILEGES tells MySQL to reload the user permissions so they take effect immediately. \ Time to Configure the Replica (Secondary) Servers a. First, let’s access the replica containers the same way we did with the master. Run this command in your terminal for each of the replica containers: \ docker exec -it <replica_container_name> bash mysql -uroot -p <replica_container_name> should be replace with the name of the replica container you are trying to setup b. Now it’s time to tell our replica where to get its data from. While inside the replica’s MySQL shell, run the following command to configure replication using the master’s details: CHANGE REPLICATION SOURCE TO SOURCE_HOST='mysql-master', SOURCE_USER='repl_user', SOURCE_PASSWORD='replication_pass', GET_SOURCE_PUBLIC_KEY=1; With the replication settings in place, let’s fire up the replica and get it syncing with the master. Still inside the MySQL shell on the replica, run: START REPLICA; This starts the replication process. To make sure everything is working, check the replica’s status with:
SHOW REPLICA STATUS\G; Look for Replica_IO_Running and Replica_SQL_Running — if both say Yes, congratulations! 🎉 Your replica is now successfully connected to the master and replicating data in real time.
Testing Our Replication Setup from the Node.js App Now that our replication is successfully set up, we can configure our Node.js server to observe the real-time effect of data being replicated from the master server to the replica server whenever we write to it. We start by installing the following dependencies:
npm i express mysql2 sequelize \ Now create a folder called src in the root directory and add the following files inside that folder connection.js, index.js and model.js. Our current directory should look like this We can now set up our connections to our master and replica server in the connection.js file as shown below
const Sequelize = require("sequelize"); const sequelize = new Sequelize({ dialect: "mysql", replication: { write: { host: "127.0.0.1", username: "root", password: "master", database: "replicaDb", }, read: [ { host: "127.0.0.1", username: "root", password: "slave", database: "replicaDb", port: 3307 }, { host: "127.0.0.1", username: "root", password: "slave", database: "replicaDb", port: 3308 }, { host: "127.0.0.1", username: "root", password: "slave", database: "replicaDb", port: 3309 }, ], }, }); async function connectdb() { try { await sequelize.authenticate(); } catch (error) { console.error("❌ unable to connect to the follower database", error); } } connectdb(); module.exports = { sequelize, }; \ We can now create a User table in the model.js file
const {DataTypes} = require("sequelize"); const { sequelize } = require("./connection"); const User = sequelize.define("User", { name: { type: DataTypes.STRING, allowNull: false, }, email: { type: DataTypes.STRING, unique: true, allowNull: false, }, }); module.exports = User \ and finally in our index.js file we can start our server and listen for connections on port 3000. from the code sample below, all inserts or updates will be routed by sequelize to the master server. while all read queries will be routed to the read replicas.
const express = require("express"); const { sequelize } = require("./connection"); const User = require("./model"); const app = express(); app.use(express.json()); async function main() { await sequelize.sync({ alter: true }); app.get("/", (req, res) => { res.status(200).json({ message: "first step to setting server up", }); }); app.post("/user", async (req, res) => { const { email, name } = req.body; let newUser = await User.build({ name, email, }); // This INSERT will go to the write (master) connection newUser = newUser.save({ returning: false }); res.status(201).json({ message: "User successfully created", }); }); app.get("/user", async (req, res) => { // This SELECT query will go to one of the read replicas const users = await User.findAll(); res.status(200).json(users); }); app.listen(3000, () => { console.log("server has connected"); }); } main(); When you make a POST request to the /users endpoint, take a moment to check both the master and replica servers to observe how data is replicated in real time. Right now, we are relying on Sequelize to automatically route requests, which works for development but isn’t robust enough for a production environment. In particular, if the master node goes down, Sequelize cannot automatically redirect requests to a newly elected leader. In the next part of this series, we’ll explore strategies to handle these challenges
Share
Hackernoon2025/09/18 14:44
Nvidia shares fall 3%

Nvidia shares fall 3%

The post Nvidia shares fall 3% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Home » AI » Nvidia shares fall 3% Chipmaker extends decline as investors continue to take profits from recent highs. Photo: Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images Key Takeaways Nvidia’s stock decreased by 3% today. The decline extends Nvidia’s recent losing streak. Nvidia shares fell 3% today, extending the chipmaker’s recent decline. The stock dropped further during trading as the artificial intelligence chip leader continued its pullback from recent highs. Disclaimer Source: https://cryptobriefing.com/nvidia-shares-fall-2-8/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:13