The post Instagram denies reports of users ‘sensitive information’ leaked in data breach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. 17.5 million Instagram users have The post Instagram denies reports of users ‘sensitive information’ leaked in data breach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. 17.5 million Instagram users have

Instagram denies reports of users ‘sensitive information’ leaked in data breach

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

17.5 million Instagram users have reportedly had their usernames, house and email addresses, phone number as well as other personal information put up for sale on underground websites, according to Malwarebytes. 

Users have reported receiving multiple password reset request emails following the alleged hack reported by Malwarebytes. However, Meta continues to insist that there was no breach.

Was Instagram’s user data leaked?

Malwarebytes reported that Instagram discovered a breach in its security during a routine dark web monitoring scan. And it claims that it has resulted in the sensitive data of approximately 17.5 million Instagram users being made available for sale on underground forums so far.

The compromised information includes Instagram usernames, physical addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, and additional personal details. The cybersecurity company said this incident is linked to a potential API exposure that occurred in 2024.

However, Meta, Instagram’s parent company, has so far denied the breach claims, stating it fixed a technical issue and, in the process, had password reset emails triggered by an external party.

“We fixed an issue that let an external party request password reset emails for some people. There was no breach of our systems and your Instagram accounts are secure. You can ignore those emails — sorry for any confusion,” the company wrote

Despite Meta’s denial, many Instagram users have reported receiving multiple password reset request emails in recent days, and panic has spread on social media that cybercriminals are attempting to exploit people’s stolen information.

The leaked information could also be used by the attackers to craft convincing fraudulent messages that make users more likely to click on malicious links or provide additional sensitive information.

With access to usernames, email addresses, and phone numbers, cybercriminals can attempt to gain control of an individual’s accounts. The attackers can use it to spread spam, scam the victim’s followers, or access any linked payment information or private messages.

The physical addresses included in the breach could potentially be used for identity theft, targeted harassment, or even to threaten someone’s physical safety.

How can Instagram users protect themselves?

ManageMyHealth, New Zealand’s largest patient portal with about 1.8 million registered users, revealed that there was unauthorized access to its application. It stated that approximately 6% to 7% of its users may be impacted, which is roughly 108,000 to 126,000 people.

Security experts strongly recommend that all Instagram users take immediate protective measures like enabling two-factor authentication on their accounts. The security feature requires a second form of verification beyond just your password, which is typically a code sent to your phone or generated by an authentication app.

They also recommend changing your Instagram password, especially if you’ve been using the same password for an extended period or if you’ve reused it across multiple platforms. Users should create strong, unique passwords that have uppercase and lowercase letters as well as numbers and special characters.

Instagram users have been warned to be skeptical of unexpected emails, text messages, or direct messages asking for personal information or urging immediate action.

Meta was in a similar situation back in November 2024 when a leak reportedly exposed 489 million Instagram user records on a dark web platform.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/instagram-denies-data-breach/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

  Startups in 2025 are moving faster than ever. With lean teams, remote workforces, and aggressive growth goals, manual HR management no longer fits the modern
Share
Techbullion2026/03/08 15:29
Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

The post Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SHIB exchange flow is hinting
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/08 15:30