Top executives from Europe’s largest banks and insurance companies are pressing officials in Brussels to add economic growth as a key responsibility for financialTop executives from Europe’s largest banks and insurance companies are pressing officials in Brussels to add economic growth as a key responsibility for financial

Banks, insurers push EU regulators to focus on economic growth, not just stability

Top executives from Europe’s largest banks and insurance companies are pressing officials in Brussels to add economic growth as a key responsibility for financial regulators, arguing the current system puts too much emphasis on stability at the expense of competitiveness.

The head of Zurich Insurance Group, Michel Liès, has urged European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen to copy what Britain did when it gave its financial watchdogs a similar growth-focused duty several years back.

Industry group argues stability and growth can coexist

“The fact that London has reacted a little bit quicker than Brussels is probably due to the complexity of Europe but we just want to make sure that we put that on the table,” Liès said in an interview. “If we don’t address these urgent issues in the continent of Europe it will be too late.”

Liès, who runs Switzerland’s largest insurance firm, made the call representing the European Financial Services Round Table, a powerful industry group that includes top leaders from 24 major banks and insurers across the region.

The group makes the case that keeping the financial system stable and helping it compete globally are goals that can work together.

“Competitiveness and stability are not mutually exclusive: both are essential if Europe is to compete on the global stage,” the appeal states. It asks for the EU’s six main financial oversight bodies to receive clear instructions to promote both growth and competitiveness.

Right now, European financial regulators have one main job: keeping the financial system stable. According to the industry group, this single focus has created problems.

“European regulators and supervisors have been given one statutory objective: financial stability,” Liès wrote. “Stability has too often become a justification for adding new layers of requirements without assessing their impact, effectiveness or cumulative cost burdens that inevitably fall on our clients.”

The appeal points out that most other developed regions take a different approach. Britain changed its rules in 2023, giving its two primary financial regulators additional duties to support economic growth and competitiveness. Since then, government officials have regularly asked these agencies to demonstrate how they are meeting this goal.

“The UK’s regulatory experience — where the sector has been included as a priority in the industrial strategy and competitiveness recognised as a legitimate objective alongside stability — offers a model ambition for Europe,” Liès wrote.

The push from the European Financial Services Round Table shows growing frustration among banking and insurance executives with how slowly regulatory changes happen in Brussels. Many worry they are falling behind American competitors, where rules are being relaxed more quickly.

Currently, EU financial regulators must concentrate on keeping the sector stable and protecting customers. Industry leaders say this setup encourages officials to keep piling on complicated rules without thinking about whether these regulations might hurt economic growth.

The round table represents major financial institutions including BNP Paribas, Barclays, Santander, Allianz, Deutsche Bank, UBS and ING. The group argues that giving regulators an official growth and competitiveness mandate would make them more answerable to the European parliament.

Legislative changes needed as support grows

Making these changes would require new EU laws to alter the mandates of several regulatory bodies, including the European Securities and Markets Authority, the European Banking Authority, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority and the European Central Bank.

However, the idea is gaining support. Last month, European finance ministers asked the Commission to look at improving the mandates of EU financial regulators, including the ECB’s Single Supervisory Mechanism that watches over the biggest banks, to increase accountability.

The Commission responded by saying EU regulators currently concentrate mainly on the stability and effectiveness of the financial system. It noted that a planned reform of the European Securities and Markets Authority, which is similar to Britain’s FCA, did not include giving the agency a competitiveness mandate, though some small improvements are being considered.

The Commission has plans to release a report about the competitiveness of Europe’s banking sector later this year.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0006433
$0.0006433$0.0006433
+3.90%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

Sui Mainnet Recovers After 6-Hour Network Stall: No Funds at Risk

On January 14, 2026, Sui Mainnet faced a significant disruption, leaving the network stalled for roughly six hours. The incident was caused by an internal divergence
Share
Tronweekly2026/01/17 09:30
Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News

The post Will There Be A ’28 Years Later 3’ After ‘The Bone Temple’? Here’s The Good News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Chi Lewis-Parry and Ralph Fiennes
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/17 09:21
Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill

BitcoinWorld Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with significant developments as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong recently took to Washington, D.C., advocating passionately for a clearer regulatory path. His mission? To champion the passage of a vital crypto market structure bill, specifically the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act. This legislative push is not just about policy; it’s about safeguarding investor rights and fostering innovation in the digital asset space. Why a Clear Crypto Market Structure Bill is Essential Brian Armstrong’s visit underscores a growing sentiment within the crypto industry: the urgent need for regulatory clarity. Without clear guidelines, the market operates in a gray area, leaving both innovators and investors vulnerable. The proposed crypto market structure bill aims to bring much-needed definition to this dynamic sector. Armstrong explicitly stated on X that this legislation is crucial to prevent a recurrence of actions that infringe on investor rights, citing past issues with former U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler. This proactive approach seeks to establish a stable and predictable environment for digital assets. Understanding the CLARITY Act: A Blueprint for Digital Assets The Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act is designed to establish a robust regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. It seeks to delineate the responsibilities of key regulatory bodies, primarily the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Here are some key provisions: Clear Jurisdiction: The bill aims to specify which digital assets fall under the purview of the SEC as securities and which are considered commodities under the CFTC. Investor Protection: By defining these roles, the act intends to provide clearer rules for market participants, thereby enhancing investor protection. Exemption Conditions: A significant aspect of the bill would exempt certain cryptocurrencies from the stringent registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, provided they meet specific criteria. This could reduce regulatory burdens for legitimate projects. This comprehensive approach promises to bring structure to a rapidly evolving market. The Urgency Behind the Crypto Market Structure Bill The call for a dedicated crypto market structure bill is not new, but Armstrong’s direct engagement highlights the increasing pressure for legislative action. The lack of a clear framework has led to regulatory uncertainty, stifling innovation and sometimes leading to enforcement actions that many in the industry view as arbitrary. Passing this legislation would: Foster Innovation: Provide a clear roadmap for developers and entrepreneurs, encouraging new projects and technologies. Boost Investor Confidence: Offer greater certainty and protection for individuals investing in digital assets. Prevent Future Conflicts: Reduce the likelihood of disputes between regulatory bodies and crypto firms, creating a more harmonious ecosystem. The industry believes that a well-defined regulatory landscape is essential for the long-term health and growth of the digital economy. What a Passed Crypto Market Structure Bill Could Mean for You If the CLARITY Act or a similar crypto market structure bill passes, its impact could be profound for everyone involved in the crypto space. For investors, it could mean a more secure and transparent market. For businesses, it offers a predictable environment to build and scale. Conversely, continued regulatory ambiguity could: Stifle Growth: Drive innovation overseas and deter new entrants. Increase Risks: Leave investors exposed to unregulated practices. Create Uncertainty: Lead to ongoing legal battles and market instability. The stakes are incredibly high, making the advocacy efforts of leaders like Brian Armstrong all the more critical. The push for a clear crypto market structure bill is a pivotal moment for the digital asset industry. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s efforts in Washington, D.C., reflect a widespread desire for regulatory clarity that protects investors, fosters innovation, and ensures the long-term viability of cryptocurrencies. The CLARITY Act offers a potential blueprint for this future, aiming to define jurisdictional boundaries and streamline regulatory requirements. Its passage could unlock significant growth and stability, cementing the U.S. as a leader in the global digital economy. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act? The CLARITY Act is a proposed crypto market structure bill aimed at establishing a clear regulatory framework for digital assets in the U.S. It seeks to define the roles of the SEC and CFTC and exempt certain cryptocurrencies from securities registration requirements under specific conditions. Why is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong advocating for this bill? Brian Armstrong is advocating for the CLARITY Act to bring regulatory certainty to the crypto industry, protect investor rights from unclear enforcement actions, and foster innovation within the digital asset space. He believes it’s crucial for the industry’s sustainable growth. How would this bill impact crypto investors? For crypto investors, the passage of this crypto market structure bill would mean greater clarity on which assets are regulated by whom, potentially leading to enhanced consumer protections, reduced market uncertainty, and a more stable investment environment. What are the primary roles of the SEC and CFTC concerning this bill? The bill aims to delineate the responsibilities of the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) regarding digital assets. It seeks to clarify which assets fall under securities regulation and which are considered commodities, reducing jurisdictional ambiguity. What could happen if a crypto market structure bill like CLARITY Act does not pass? If a clear crypto market structure bill does not pass, the industry may continue to face regulatory uncertainty, potentially leading to stifled innovation, increased legal challenges for crypto companies, and a less secure environment for investors due to inconsistent enforcement and unclear rules. Did you find this article insightful? Share it with your network to help spread awareness about the crucial discussions shaping the future of digital assets! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto regulation and institutional adoption. This post Urgent: Coinbase CEO Pushes for Crucial Crypto Market Structure Bill first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 20:35