Democrats Revive Crypto Market Bill After Setback

Democratic senators in the U.S. have resumed discussions on the crypto market structure bill, holding a call with industry representatives following a legislative setback this week..

Efforts to progress the bill highlight ongoing regulatory challenges, with major crypto entities like Coinbase voicing concerns, while Senate committee activities continue amid uncertain political dynamics.

Democratic Senators Push for Crypto Bill Amid Delays

The Senate Banking and Agriculture Committees, both involved in the bill’s passage, participated in the discussions. A review hearing by the Agriculture Committee is expected to take place later this month, though the date might be adjusted due to industry doubts. If both committees pass their respective versions, the bill will be merged for a full Senate vote.

Key reactions emerged from industry figures, with Coinbase’s CEO, Brian Armstrong, voicing concerns over privacy and regulatory impacts. Armstrong declared, “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill,” highlighting substantial industry opposition.

The White House crypto czar, David Sacks, and other leaders are pushing for the resolution of differences, signaling varied stakeholder interests.

Industry Influence and Financial Impact of Crypto Legislation

Did you know? The Senate Banking Committee’s prior postponement of the crypto legislation vote mirrors past instances where discussions on financial regulations were stalled due to lack of consensus, reflecting ongoing challenges in the legislative process.

Historically, industry influence has been notable in shaping legislative outcomes. In the 2024 elections, over $100 million was spent promoting a pro-crypto Congress, demonstrating the substantial financial clout behind these negotiations.

Potential financial effects of the current legislation include restrictions on stablecoin rewards and increased oversight on spot crypto markets, as detailed in previous bills like the GENIUS Act of 2025. Market participants are closely watching these developments, as the outcome could influence the regulatory landscape significantly.