Matthew Sigel clarifies VanEck’s stance on MSTR, confirming increased exposure to the company and correcting NYT’s misrepresentation. Matthew Sigel, head of digitalMatthew Sigel clarifies VanEck’s stance on MSTR, confirming increased exposure to the company and correcting NYT’s misrepresentation. Matthew Sigel, head of digital

VanEck Increases Exposure to MSTR as Matthew Sigel Corrects NYT Claim

Matthew Sigel clarifies VanEck’s stance on MSTR, confirming increased exposure to the company and correcting NYT’s misrepresentation.

Matthew Sigel, head of digital asset research at VanEck, responded to a New York Times article misrepresenting the firm’s stance on MicroStrategy (MSTR).

Sigel clarified that the report misinterpreted Jan van Eck’s comments on MSTR’s Bitcoin strategy.

He emphasized that VanEck has actually increased its exposure to MSTR and continues to support the company’s Bitcoin-backed approach.

Sigel Corrects Misleading Reporting in the New York Times

The New York Times article included a quote from Jan van Eck that seemed critical of MSTR’s Bitcoin strategy.

The quote, “We’ve stayed away… It’s just publicity,” led some readers to believe that VanEck was avoiding MSTR due to its Bitcoin-heavy structure.

However, Sigel explained that this quote referred to VanEck’s own internal strategy, not its view on MSTR.

Sigel took to social media to clarify that the report misrepresented the context of Jan van Eck’s statement.

He pointed out that VanEck is not actively pursuing a digital asset treasury strategy but does not oppose MSTR’s approach.

The correction was important to clear up any confusion regarding VanEck’s stance on the company.

Despite the misrepresentation, Sigel reaffirmed that VanEck is still confident in MSTR and its Bitcoin strategy.

He emphasized that the firm has increased its position in MSTR, contrary to what the article suggested.

VanEck Increases Its MSTR Holdings

VanEck’s SEC filings confirm that the firm has significantly increased its exposure to MSTR. VanEck now holds approximately 284,000 shares of MSTR, placing it among the top 75 shareholders.

This increase in holdings shows the firm’s commitment to MSTR despite some market uncertainty.

Sigel explained that VanEck’s investment in MSTR is a strategic move to gain exposure to Bitcoin-related assets.

The firm continues to support MSTR’s model, which links its balance sheet to Bitcoin. This exposure includes common shares as well as preferred shares tied to MSTR’s Bitcoin assets.

The decision to increase its stake in MSTR reflects VanEck’s belief in the company’s long-term potential.

Sigel’s clarification highlights that the firm is still bullish on MSTR, despite any misinterpretation of their earlier comments.

Related Reading: VanEck 2026 Q1 Outlook: Risk-On Markets Put Bitcoin and Crypto Back in Focus

SEC Filings Back VanEck’s Continued Support for MSTR

VanEck’s SEC Form 13F filings show the firm’s ongoing support for MSTR. These filings confirm that VanEck has not reduced its position in the company, despite reports suggesting otherwise.

The firm’s continued ownership of MSTR shares shows its confidence in the company’s Bitcoin strategy.

The filings also disclose that VanEck owns preferred shares issued by MSTR. These preferred shares are tied to the company’s Bitcoin-backed balance sheet and offer fixed cash distributions.

This structure allows VanEck to participate in MSTR’s potential growth while managing risk.

With these filings, VanEck has reinforced its commitment to MSTR. Sigel’s correction underscores the firm’s strategic investment in MSTR, countering any previous misunderstandings about its position.

The post VanEck Increases Exposure to MSTR as Matthew Sigel Corrects NYT Claim appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Market Opportunity
SecondLive Logo
SecondLive Price(LIVE)
$0.00003612
$0.00003612$0.00003612
-4.64%
USD
SecondLive (LIVE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.