Trove Markets has raised the ire of its community following its sudden flip in its decentralized perpetual exchange, which transitioned from Hyperliquid to SolanaTrove Markets has raised the ire of its community following its sudden flip in its decentralized perpetual exchange, which transitioned from Hyperliquid to Solana

Trove Backers Seek Refunds After Sudden Pivot From Hyperliquid to Solana

2026/01/19 14:37
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Trove shifted its focus from Hyperliquid to Solana after securing over 11.5 million dollars in Hyperliquid-related funds.
  • Members of the village have been demanding a refund because the initial terms of their investment do not apply.
  • Advisors on-chain pointed out some activity with the HYPE token, which further drew focus before the launch of the TROVE token.

Trove Markets has raised the ire of its community following its sudden flip in its decentralized perpetual exchange, which transitioned from Hyperliquid to Solana, amid having raised over $11.5 million for its launch, which was based on its Hyperliquid model. Backers are now demanding refunds as the project’s TGEP approaches.

The token sale for TROVE was expected to take place between January 8th and January 11th, and the token generation sale was also expected to continue on Monday at 4:00 pm UTC. Nevertheless, Trove has admitted that the move to Solana and the handling of requests for refunds could take some extra time.

Trove first disclosed the pivot in a Friday post on X. Shortly after, one of the project’s builders, known as “Unwise,” explained that a liquidity partner had withdrawn 500,000 Hyperliquid (HYPE) tokens that Trove needed to deploy its product on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure.

“This changes our constraints,” Unwise said. “We’re no longer building on Hyperliquid rails, so we’re rebuilding the perp DEX on Solana from the ground up.”

Hyperliquid exit sparks backlash

The announcement caught many supporters off guard. In November, Trove raised a separate $20 million to purchase 500,000 HYPE tokens required for Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 staking model. That stake acts as a slashable security bond needed to launch a perpetual market on Hyperliquid, which made the project’s original roadmap heavily dependent on that ecosystem.

As a result, critics argue that Trove raised capital under specific technical and ecosystem assumptions that no longer apply. Several backers immediately took to X to demand refunds rather than a revised roadmap.

“Refund everyone ASAP and re-raise with your new conditions,” wrote X user NMTD.HL. “People did not invest in your ICO for you to launch on Solana.”

Another user, HYPEconomist, echoed the sentiment. “You raised money to build on Hyperliquid. Give it back and raise again on Solana if that’s what your community wants.”

Others have asked Trove to elucidate their intentions with refund options following the TGE and how the Solana rebuild impacts existing promises.

Trove pushes ahead with Solana rebuild

Despite all this criticism, Trove is set to work on Solana and assist in building their product of a limitless collectibles exchange based on perpetual exchange. The platform aims to support trading for assets such as Pokémon cards and Counter-Strike 2 skins, a niche that Bitwise projected in September could grow into a $21.4 billion market.

Trove said the Solana pivot allows the team to rebuild without the constraints imposed by Hyperliquid’s staking and liquidity requirements. However, the team has not yet detailed how it plans to replace the capital structure tied to the original HYPE stake.

On-chain activity raises new questions

Adding to the controversy, blockchain investigator ZachXBT and the Hyperliquid News account flagged several Trove-related transfers involving HYPE tokens. The observations relied on data from the Hyperliquid block explorer, Hypurrscan, and have fueled speculation about how the tokens raised for the Hyperliquid launch were distributed after the pivot.

So far, Trove has not publicly addressed the flagged transfers. Cointelegraph reached out for comment but did not receive an immediate response.

With the TGE looming ever closer, Trove faces ever-creasing pressure to repair public trust and make it abundantly clear how the project’s refund structure and Solana roadmap relate to each other. The results may determine how future projects communicate changes in the now-skeptical world of token economics.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Newrez to Recognize Cryptocurrency Holdings in U.S. Mortgage Qualification Framework

Market Opportunity
Talisman Logo
Talisman Price(SEEK)
$0.02987
$0.02987$0.02987
-3.52%
USD
Talisman (SEEK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation?

The post Is Hyperliquid the new frontier for innovation? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from the 0xResearch newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe. One of the key things I like to track in crypto is a subjective criterion I call “where are new interesting developments and proposals taking place.” There are plenty of dashboards and analytics sites for this, the most popular being the Electric Capital site. The issue is that it still shows Polkadot as having a lot of developers. (At Blockworks we solved the noise problem with active users; maybe we can try the same for active developers.) Because of this noise, I prefer to track two simple observations: What is the velocity of new products launching, and how much mindshare are these products capturing? Are many people getting nerdsniped into discussing the novelties and intricacies of the chain? A related point is the caliber of people being attracted to new ecosystems. For example, over the past few years, Solana (and Ethereum) attracted the majority of talent. Talent generally goes where: It can solve interesting problems or create interesting projects. It can make a lot of money. In a podcast I did with Icebergy about a year ago, we discussed how crypto still wasn’t attracting talent at the levels AI was, despite offering faster exits and more money. AI was (and probably still is) more interesting to most talent and seen as more prestigious. After FTX, crypto lost a lot of credibility and has only recently started recovering as larger institutional players re-entered. Apart from FTX, crypto has also been criticized for being full of low-effort forks and limited utility products. This dynamic isn’t unique to crypto though. Many AI companies are also just building wrappers around GPT, which is as uninteresting as some projects in crypto. Anyway, to the point: Historically, Solana has captured the majority of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 08:13
Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

Why More Startups Are Automating Their HR Processes in 2025

  Startups in 2025 are moving faster than ever. With lean teams, remote workforces, and aggressive growth goals, manual HR management no longer fits the modern
Share
Techbullion2026/03/08 15:29
Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand

The post Shiba Inu Records -131 Billion in 24 Hours: Negative Netflow Signals Growing Demand appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SHIB exchange flow is hinting
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/08 15:30