A viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapseA viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapse

Solana validator debate flares as founder rebuts 84% node-collapse claim

A viral post claimed Solana lost 84% of its validators, but Anatoly Yakovenko says the real drop is ~20% and tied to a subsidy program ending, not a network collapse.

Summary
  • A social post alleging an 84% plunge in Solana validators sparked fresh centralization fears, comparing SOL to a “centralized database.”​
  • Yakovenko countered that validator participation fell closer to 20% after the Solana Foundation’s Delegation Program wound down.​
  • He stressed the difference between validators and full nodes, claiming roughly 5,000 Solana full nodes versus 8,300 on Ethereum despite ETH’s much larger market cap.

A dispute over Solana’s (SOL) validator count and network decentralization emerged over the weekend after a post claiming an 84% drop in validators circulated widely on social media.

Solana validator debate flares as founder rebuts 84% node-collapse claim - 1

Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko disputed the claim, stating the actual decline in validator participation was closer to 20% over the past 12 months, according to his public response.

Yakovenko also contested the post’s conflation of validators and full nodes, writing that “Validators are not full nodes.” According to Yakovenko, Solana operates approximately 5,000 full nodes, compared to 8,300 full nodes on the Ethereum blockchain, which has a market capitalization four times larger than Solana’s.

The decline in Solana nodes was attributed to the conclusion of the Solana Foundation Delegation Program (SFDP), a one-year bootstrap initiative that covered voting costs for small validators, according to Yakovenko’s explanation.

Critics continued to question Solana’s decentralization despite the corrections, with comparisons to centralized databases persisting. One social media user claimed operating costs of $20 million per validator prevented broader participation, though this figure could not be independently verified.

Operating a self-hosted, fully validating Solana node requires substantial financial resources, according to industry reports. Hardware costs begin in the hundreds of dollars and can reach thousands, while voting costs can push annual expenses into the tens of thousands of dollars, according to node operators.

Some Solana validators stake millions of dollars worth of tokens and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on operational costs, according to industry participants. Multiple startups have been developing solutions to enable network verification on consumer-grade hardware and home internet connections, though such products remain in alpha testing phases.

Market Opportunity
NODE Logo
NODE Price(NODE)
$0.01478
$0.01478$0.01478
-0.40%
USD
NODE (NODE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

ArtGis Finance Partners with MetaXR to Expand its DeFi Offerings in the Metaverse

ArtGis Finance Partners with MetaXR to Expand its DeFi Offerings in the Metaverse

By using this collaboration, ArtGis utilizes MetaXR’s infrastructure to widen access to its assets and enable its customers to interact with the metaverse.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 00:07
The Best Parental Control Apps for 2026: Top Picks for Screen Time, Web Filtering, and Location Safety

The Best Parental Control Apps for 2026: Top Picks for Screen Time, Web Filtering, and Location Safety

Choosing a parental control app isn’t just about blocking websites. The best tools help families set healthy boundaries without turning daily life into constant
Share
Techbullion2026/01/20 00:39
Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be

The post Why The Green Bay Packers Must Take The Cleveland Browns Seriously — As Hard As That Might Be appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Jordan Love and the Green Bay Packers are off to a 2-0 start. Getty Images The Green Bay Packers are, once again, one of the NFL’s better teams. The Cleveland Browns are, once again, one of the league’s doormats. It’s why unbeaten Green Bay (2-0) is a 8-point favorite at winless Cleveland (0-2) Sunday according to betmgm.com. The money line is also Green Bay -500. Most expect this to be a Packers’ rout, and it very well could be. But Green Bay knows taking anyone in this league for granted can prove costly. “I think if you look at their roster, the paper, who they have on that team, what they can do, they got a lot of talent and things can turn around quickly for them,” Packers safety Xavier McKinney said. “We just got to kind of keep that in mind and know we not just walking into something and they just going to lay down. That’s not what they going to do.” The Browns certainly haven’t laid down on defense. Far from. Cleveland is allowing an NFL-best 191.5 yards per game. The Browns gave up 141 yards to Cincinnati in Week 1, including just seven in the second half, but still lost, 17-16. Cleveland has given up an NFL-best 45.5 rushing yards per game and just 2.1 rushing yards per attempt. “The biggest thing is our defensive line is much, much improved over last year and I think we’ve got back to our personality,” defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz said recently. “When we play our best, our D-line leads us there as our engine.” The Browns rank third in the league in passing defense, allowing just 146.0 yards per game. Cleveland has also gone 30 straight games without allowing a 300-yard passer, the longest active streak in the NFL.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:41