TLDR Meta stock traded near $620 as regulatory scrutiny intensified in the UK. UK Gambling Commission accused Meta of ignoring illegal gambling ads. Regulators TLDR Meta stock traded near $620 as regulatory scrutiny intensified in the UK. UK Gambling Commission accused Meta of ignoring illegal gambling ads. Regulators

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) Stock: Slips as UK Watchdog Accuses Firm of Ignoring Illegal Gambling Ads

TLDR

  • Meta stock traded near $620 as regulatory scrutiny intensified in the UK.
  • UK Gambling Commission accused Meta of ignoring illegal gambling ads.
  • Regulators claim unlicensed operators openly target UK users on Meta platforms.
  • Meta’s own advertising rules require gambling firms to hold local licenses.
  • The issue adds to growing global pressure on Big Tech content oversight.

Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) shares closed at $620.25, down 0.09%, as investors digested new regulatory criticism from the United Kingdom. The UK Gambling Commission accused Meta of “turning a blind eye” to illegal gambling advertisements appearing on Facebook and Instagram, raising fresh concerns around regulatory compliance and platform accountability.


META Stock CardMeta Platforms, Inc., META

The comments were delivered by Tim Miller, executive director of the UK Gambling Commission, during a speech at the ICE gaming conference in Barcelona on January 19. His remarks highlighted what regulators see as a persistent failure by Meta to proactively detect and block ads from unlicensed gambling operators targeting UK users.

UK Watchdog Raises Alarm Over Illegal Ads

According to Miller, the Gambling Commission has been monitoring Meta’s searchable ad library and repeatedly found advertisements from gambling operators that lack the required UK license. These operators are still able to reach consumers in the country, despite strict local rules governing gambling promotion.

“It’s effectively a window into criminality,” Miller said, according to a transcript of his speech. He added that if regulators can easily locate such ads, Meta should also be capable of identifying them using its own tools.

Meta’s advertising policies state that gambling companies must be licensed in the jurisdictions they target. The Gambling Commission’s criticism suggests a gap between stated policy and enforcement in practice.

Use of Keywords Highlights Enforcement Gaps

The regulator said it searched for ads using the phrase “not on Gamstop,” a reference to the UK’s self-exclusion scheme that allows problem gamblers to block access to licensed gambling platforms. All licensed UK operators are required to integrate Gamstop and deny access to users enrolled in the program.

Miller said ads using this keyword were easy to find on Meta’s platforms, implying that unlicensed operators are openly marketing themselves as alternatives that bypass consumer protections. He argued that Meta could use the same keyword tools to block such advertising before it reaches users.

According to the regulator, Meta suggested that authorities use their own artificial intelligence systems to find and report illegal ads, with the company removing them once notified. The Gambling Commission expressed frustration with this reactive approach.

Broader Risks to Consumers and Public Trust

The UK Gambling Commission emphasized that illegal gambling ads pose risks to vulnerable users and provide revenue streams for criminal groups and scammers. Unlicensed operators do not pay taxes and often lack safeguards that protect consumers from fraud and harm.

The regulator noted that the UK has taken down hundreds of thousands of websites linked to illegal gambling but described enforcement as a constant challenge due to the speed at which new sites emerge. Digital advertising platforms play a central role in this ecosystem by enabling rapid customer acquisition.

Similar issues have been reported outside the UK. An earlier investigation cited illegal gambling ads appearing on Meta platforms in countries where gambling is outlawed, including India, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia.

Meta Remains Silent as Scrutiny Builds

A spokesperson for Meta did not immediately respond to requests for comment following the Gambling Commission’s remarks. The lack of an official response leaves uncertainty around whether the company plans to change its enforcement practices or increase proactive monitoring.

For Meta, the criticism arrives at a time of heightened global scrutiny over platform responsibility, advertising standards, and regulatory compliance. Governments worldwide are pressing large technology firms to take a more active role in policing harmful or illegal activity on their services.

Stock Performance and Investor Context

Despite the regulatory headline, Meta shares showed limited immediate reaction, reflecting investor focus on longer-term fundamentals. Over the past three years, META has delivered a total return of nearly 356%, far outperforming the S&P 500. Year-to-date, however, the stock is down 6.04%, lagging the broader market.

While the UK Gambling Commission’s comments do not currently involve fines or formal enforcement action, they add to the list of regulatory risks investors must weigh. The episode underscores how content oversight and advertising controls remain central challenges for Meta as regulators demand stronger accountability from Big Tech platforms.

The post Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) Stock: Slips as UK Watchdog Accuses Firm of Ignoring Illegal Gambling Ads appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
WorldAssets Logo
WorldAssets Price(INC)
$0.7209
$0.7209$0.7209
-10.63%
USD
WorldAssets (INC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.