The post Meet The ‘Star Of Pure Land,’ A 3563-Carat Sapphire, At $300 Million appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ‘Star of Pure Land’ certified by the GemologicalThe post Meet The ‘Star Of Pure Land,’ A 3563-Carat Sapphire, At $300 Million appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. ‘Star of Pure Land’ certified by the Gemological

Meet The ‘Star Of Pure Land,’ A 3563-Carat Sapphire, At $300 Million

‘Star of Pure Land’ certified by the Gemological Institute of America (GIA) as the world’s largest natural purple star sapphire is unveiled in Colombo on January 17, 2026. (Photo by Ishara S. KODIKARA / AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Three thousand five hundred and sixty-tree carats, a measurement of weight and in a certain way a measurement of the size of gemstones, translates as 1.57 pounds, which is just one of the several reason why the ultra-rare Sri Lankan “natural purple” star sapphire, certified on January 17 in Colombo by the American Gemological Institute as the world’s largest of its kind, has just been valued at a curiously flat but still stratospheric $300 million. With no shred of irony, the stone has been named the “Star of Pure Land.” Its estimate rests first on its size — meaning on the extreme rarity of a stone “of” that size — but the value lies in almost equal measure upon its quality.

That elusive value/quality equation works like this: So-called “star” sapphires of the highest natural quality carry what are called needles of the element rutile within them, which refracts light differently within the stone, creating — in this case — the famous six-pointed star reflection on the stone’s surface when illuminated. Ideally, sapphires’ stars are thought best when clearly , geometrically delineated, unsullied by contaminant minerals or whorls within the molecular grain of the stone. With its reported natural clarity, the Star of Pure Land has that.

Additionally, its purple (not blue) color, as well as its sheer mass at that level of purity means that in this stone’s formation, the conditions of the earth’s crust at that specific point under Sri Lanka were set up perfectly to generate not a tiny, perfect, thing, but a great big perfect thing. Hence the notional $300 million tag. Pictured top, the Star of Pure Land, yet to be abraded or polished.

The Star of Pure Land is rare in this way: the immense geologic pressures in the crust that forge sapphires and then bring them up to mine-able depth occur over many millennia. A distant cousin of the Pure Land, the famous 563.35-carat blue “Star of India” held by the American Museum of Natural History in New York, has been estimated at some 2 billion years old.

The Star of India’s intensely curlicued provenance and bumptious post-sale 20th-century history is a Baedeker for all who might aspire to purchase the Pure Land, should it ever be formally or publicly offered for sale. Belle Epoque financier J.P. Morgan commissioned the Tiffany gem expert George Kunz to build him a collection of rare jewels for the Paris Exposition of 1900. Among other baubles, Kunz returned from the extended hunt with The Star of India, dropping it off in London to be cut and polished en cabochon, which is to say, abraded rather than faceted down to an elliptical shape. The Star of India exhibits the classic six-pointed star with extreme clarity across its gray-blue surface.

Toward the end of his life, Morgan donated the entire collection to the Museum of Natural History, and there, we can be forgiven for thinking, the jewel would rest.

Unfortunately for the museum, but standing as fair caveat emptor to the owners of all extraordinary gemstones, the Star of India was stolen in October 1964 by the renowned thief and convicted murderer Jack Roland “Murph the Surf” Murphy and his gang, who had managed, during working hours, to case the museum and jimmy a neglected bathroom window open. That night they went to work. The Star of India had been housed in a case rigged with an alarm whose battery was dead.

In the haul, in cases with no alarms, apparently, were the famous “Eagle” diamond and the “Delong Ruby,” which made the job the largest gem theft in American history. Murph the Surf and two of his boys were collared two days later, professing that the goods were gone. However, after being sweated in custody for two-plus months and seeking a modicum of clemency for his upcoming legal proceeding, Murphy finally came to Jesus and led the authorities to a bus locker in Miami, where the Star of India and a few other jewels from the heist had been stashed.

Predictably, in 1975, a scant decade after the heist, Hollywood immortalised the theft by filming a fine blockbuster, starring a buff Robert Conrad as the Surf alongside a lissome Donna Mills, the aptly entitled Live A Little, Steal A Lot. The Surf, literally named for his sporting hobby of surfing, and whose character in the movie was written to spend a good deal of time beachside in his bathing suit, became, perhaps predictably, a minister and died in “retirement” in 2020, at 83, in Crystal River, Florida.

At one-and-a-half pounds, or about seven times the size of the Star of India, the Star of Pure Land remains an essentially un-wearable object, and one that may not even be able to be shown, with perhaps the exception of its consortium of owners staging a well-catered drinks party in the fortified room around its presumably equally tactical case. The stone was discovered, we do know, in Sri Lanka’s southern back country near the town of Ratnapura — Sanskrit for “city of gems” — a district capital about sixty miles inland from Colombo and the shores of the Laccadive Sea.

Pictured below, the 1400-carat Star of Adam, so named by its Sri Lankan owner to celebrate the local Islamic belief that Adam, upon leaving Eden, settled in Sri Lanka. Geologically speaking an extremely close neighbor to the Star of Pure Land, the Star of Adam was discovered near Ratnapura a decade ago.

The worlds biggest blue star sapphire, the Lankan Star of Adam, is shown by its owner in Colombo on January 8, 2016. A Sri Lankan gem trader who owns the world’s largest blue star sapphire has decided to sell the dazzling stone, with a dizzying asking price of $300 million. AFP PHOTO/Ishara S. KODIKARA / AFP / Ishara S.KODIKARA (Photo credit should read ISHARA S.KODIKARA/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

It should be noted that, in the larger public sense of the markets for the world’s rare gems, the Star of Pure Land’s consortium of owners has chosen to remain anonymous. Their moves have been professionally ultra-discreet; the announcement of the Pure Land gemological certification arrives some two-plus years after the gem’s 2023 discovery.

The floated $300 million estimate doesn’t indicate a sale, nor does it imply that a sale will not occur. It is what it is, but no more than that: Yes, definitely a very large number indicating a certain metric, plus or minus tens of millions according to the market’s seismic tremors at this or that moment. But that gargantuan swing, dozens of millions wide at some theoretical future moment of sale, also means that the stone’s actual market value remains oddly indeterminate.

Said another way, it’s delightful to know out of Colombo that this is really the world’s largest and one of the finest purple sapphires, and it is surely very beautiful, but the $300 million is quite a squishy trial balloon. Whatever the ultimate fate of the Star of Pure Land, we can say that operating mechanism of the market for fine gemstones stands in blunt contrast to the prized scientific qualities it demands of the best stones in it: It has no clarity at all.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/guymartin/2026/01/21/meet-the-star-of-pure-land-a-rare-purple-sapphire-at-3563-carats/

Market Opportunity
Outlanders Logo
Outlanders Price(LAND)
$0.0002
$0.0002$0.0002
+0.40%
USD
Outlanders (LAND) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26