The post Why ‘Stranger Things’ Would Have Been So Much Better Without Vecna appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stranger Things Credit: Netflix Unsurprisingly,The post Why ‘Stranger Things’ Would Have Been So Much Better Without Vecna appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stranger Things Credit: Netflix Unsurprisingly,

Why ‘Stranger Things’ Would Have Been So Much Better Without Vecna

Stranger Things

Credit: Netflix

Unsurprisingly, I received a bit of pushback to my recent post about the main culprit behind the decline of Stranger Things. I argued at the time that while there were many problems with both Season 4 and especially Season 5, many of these can be traced back to Vecna and how the addition of a fantasy Big Bad fundamentally altered the series for the worse.

One counter-argument I’ve heard from fans is that it actually makes perfect sense to introduce a Dark Lord figure in Stranger Things, since this is a show based on Dungeons & Dragons and that game pretty heavily influenced by The Lord of the Rings. In fantasy, of course, a Dark Lord is pretty common, whether that’s Sauron or Voldemort or The Dark One from The Wheel Of Time. Dark Lords are everywhere in fantasy.

The television version of Game Of Thrones introduced its own Dark Lord in the ominous Night King, which is a pretty significant departure from the books by George R.R. Martin. Naturally, the Night King ended up being a rather lackluster Big Bad in the end.

That’s one trouble with Dark Lord archetypes. They’re built up to be these impossibly deadly and evil and cunning foes, and then our much less impressive heroes manage to take them down through grit and determination or just dumb luck.

Sauron was bested by some filthy Hobbitses and their pal, Gollum. Voldemort would have gotten away with conquering Middle-earth if it weren’t for those meddling kids. (The Vecna/Voldemort similarities are actually pretty hilarious). The Night King was built up over seven seasons, with the nightmarish Long Night perpetually on the horizon and an army of the living dead poised to roll across Westeros . . . and then Arya Stark just stabbed him to death out of the blue. I guess “Stick ‘em with the pointy end” was Chekhov’s Gun, after all.

Game of Thrones

Credit: HBO

The same problem arises in Hawkins, Indiana. The Dark Lord, Vecna, has been set up as this super powerful, evil otherworldly necromancer about to literally destroy the world, and we get one of the most lackluster boss fights ever, despite Vecna and the Mind Flayer teaming up. Many people shrug this sort of thing off, saying that it’s really hard to wrap up a five-season arc, that final seasons are often disappointing. I have no doubt of the challenge, but it’s our job as critics of media to take things apart and figure out why they’re not working. Could this series have driven more confidently across the finish line had it abandoned Vecna altogether? Perhaps.

While Stranger Things certainly was influenced heavily by Dungeons & Dragons, there has never been a great deal of Lord of the Rings DNA in the show. It’s always hewed more toward 80s’ era coming-of-age and horror, from Back to the Future to Ghostbusters to E.T. and so forth. Sticking to this type of story for all five seasons would have almost certainly resulted in a better conclusion.

The Mind Flayer, a creature of the Upside Down with no human emotion or motivations, is a much more interesting, Lovecraftian monster than Vecna ever was. Stranger Things should have either kept the Mind Flayer as the chief antagonist or revealed some even greater, more monstrous power behind it and the other eldritch horrors of the Upside Down. So much of Season 4 and 5 were spent building up Vecna, only to have it all flame out in the end.

Season 4 without Vecna could have revolved around some similar events, with the Mind Flayer targeting individuals like Max. The Upside Down itself could have begun seeping into the real world in unsettling ways. A quest to go into the Upside Down to save Max and kill the Mind Flayer once and for all would have been an exciting storyline. Better yet, it wouldn’t require retconning earlier story beats. The show could have gone other directions as well. Time travel is risky, but with the Upside Down frozen in time, you can see how it might work.

Stranger Things

Credit: Netflix

Regardless, choosing cosmic and psychological horror over mythic fantasy would have been a smart direction for Stranger Things, and would have been more thematically consistent with the first three seasons. Even the Season 5 Mind Flayer felt more akin to a dragon or fantasy monster than the shadowy terror we were first introduced to in Season 2.

Other changes I would make along with Vecna’s removal from the storyline:

  • A slimmed down cast. Sorry, Hopper, you should have died at the end of Season 3, and probably a few other characters along with you. At least one or two of the older teens, like the lovable Steve, could have also been killed. Side-characters like Murray should have been written out before becoming caricatures. Adults in general should have had less presence in the show. The genre is not about adults. It’s about kids. Imagine The Goonies with a half dozen adults tramping through the caves. Imagine that movie with the same size cast as Stranger Things.
  • Much less focus on teen romance among the core group. There was enough romance written into the Steve / Jonathan / Nancy subplot. We didn’t need Mike and Eleven to be anything more than friends. I do think that Lucas and Max ending up as a couple in the end, after he helps save her from the Upside Down / Mind Flayer, could have worked. But far too much time was spent on young teen romance and none of it improved the show.
  • No more de-powering Eleven. Eleven should have been at the forefront of Season 5 rather than sidelined by characters like Holly, though the problem was less about Holly and more about the bloated cast in general. Eleven was de-powered in Season 4 and pushed to the side in Season 5. When Will finally gets powers, he’s almost instantly de-powered as well. This kills momentum. Players of D&D will know that once you gain new powers, the last thing you want is to lose them.
  • Cut the entire military subplot. Once the Hawkins Lab people were out of the picture, I’d narrow the focus down to the main characters and their quest to somehow close off the Upside Down and/or kill the Mind Flayer (and the Mind Flayer could have been just one of many, or subservient to an even greater cosmic horror). The show could still include a government subplot, maybe some shadowy investigators poking their noses around, but as it was written, the military was just unforgivably lame.
  • Have Will come out in Season 4 rather than waiting until the end of Season 5 and, if the show insists on giving all the other kids romantic interests, give him one as well (though ideally we should have just avoided all the romance stuff in the younger group, and put an end to the love triangle in the older group much sooner). But if we must include romances for our main characters, put the “Byler” stuff to rest by giving Will a boyfriend or at least a crush.
  • Remove the ambiguity from the ending. Rather than killing off Eleven or leaving her fate a mystery, give her the happy ending she deserves. Neither of the current outcomes are satisfying in the least, though her sacrifice and death was a bold narrative choice until they nerfed it with ambiguity. In the end, Eleven should have been at the D&D table with her friends, the Upside Down closed, her powers gone for good, and a normal life ahead of her filled with love and pain and struggle and joy. I think a lot of people will disagree with me about a lot of other things in this post, but maybe we can all agree on this.

I should note, before we leave, that none of this is a critique of Jamie Campbell Bower, who played Henry / 001 / Vecna with enormous skill and talent. Even if Vecna was cut, in a perfect world Bower would have gotten some other great role in the show. Maybe a character with powers who was also investigating the Upside Down, but with nefarious motives. A secondary antagonist of some kind. Just not the Big Bad fantasy Dark Lord.

Ultimately, removing Vecna from the story wouldn’t fix all its problems, but without him, Stranger Things would have felt more like, well, Stranger Things. What do you think?

Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2026/01/21/why-stranger-things-would-have-been-so-much-better-without-vecna/

Market Opportunity
SQUID MEME Logo
SQUID MEME Price(GAME)
$39,9403
$39,9403$39,9403
+0,01%
USD
SQUID MEME (GAME) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21

VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21

The post VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. VIRTUAL closed the week up 3.57% at $0.84, but the long-term downtrend maintains its
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 06:54
MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected

MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected

BitcoinWorld MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected The cryptocurrency community is buzzing with exciting news: a native MetaMask token might arrive sooner than many anticipated. This development could reshape how users interact with the popular Web3 wallet and the broader decentralized ecosystem. It signals a significant step forward for one of the most widely used tools in the blockchain space. What’s Fueling the MetaMask Token Buzz? Joseph Lubin, the CEO of ConsenSys, the company behind MetaMask, recently shared insights that ignited this excitement. According to reports from The Block, Lubin indicated that a MetaMask token could launch ahead of previous expectations. This isn’t the first time the idea has surfaced; Dan Finlay, one of MetaMask’s founders, had previously mentioned the possibility of issuing such a token. ConsenSys has been a pivotal player in the Ethereum ecosystem, developing essential infrastructure and applications. MetaMask, their flagship wallet, serves millions of users, providing a gateway to decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and various blockchain networks. Therefore, any move to introduce a native token is a major event for the entire Web3 community. Why is a MetaMask Token So Anticipated? The prospect of a MetaMask token generates immense interest because it could introduce new layers of utility and community governance. Users often speculate about the benefits such a token could offer. Here are some key reasons for the high anticipation: Governance Rights: A token could empower users to participate in the future direction and development of MetaMask. This means voting on new features, upgrades, or even changes to the platform’s policies. Ecosystem Rewards: Tokens might be distributed as rewards for active participation, using certain features, or contributing to the MetaMask community. This incentivizes engagement and loyalty. Enhanced Utility: The token could unlock premium features, reduce transaction fees, or provide exclusive access to services within the MetaMask ecosystem or partnered dApps. Decentralization: Introducing a token often aligns with the broader Web3 ethos of decentralization, distributing control and ownership among its users rather than centralizing it within ConsenSys. Consequently, a token launch is seen as a way to deepen user involvement and foster a more robust, community-driven ecosystem around the wallet. Exploring the Potential Impact of a MetaMask Token The introduction of a MetaMask token could have far-reaching implications for the decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 landscape. Firstly, it could set a new standard for how popular infrastructure tools engage with their user base. By providing a tangible stake, MetaMask might strengthen its position as a community-governed platform. Moreover, a token could significantly boost the wallet’s visibility and adoption, attracting new users eager to participate in its governance or benefit from its utility. This could also lead to innovative integrations with other blockchain projects, creating a more interconnected and efficient Web3 experience. Ultimately, the success of such a token will depend on its design, utility, and how effectively it engages the global MetaMask community. What Challenges Could a MetaMask Token Face? While the excitement is palpable, launching a MetaMask token also presents several challenges that ConsenSys must navigate carefully. One primary concern is regulatory scrutiny. The classification of cryptocurrency tokens varies across jurisdictions, and ensuring compliance is crucial for long-term success. Furthermore, designing a fair and equitable distribution model is paramount. Ensuring that the token provides genuine utility beyond mere speculation will be another hurdle. A token must integrate seamlessly into the MetaMask experience and offer clear value to its holders. Additionally, managing community expectations and preventing market manipulation will require robust strategies. Addressing these challenges effectively will be key to the token’s sustainable growth and positive reception. What’s Next for the MetaMask Ecosystem? The prospect of a MetaMask token signals an evolving strategy for ConsenSys and the future of Web3 wallets. It reflects a growing trend where foundational tools seek to empower their communities through tokenization. Users are keenly watching for official announcements regarding the token’s mechanics, distribution, and launch timeline. This development could solidify MetaMask’s role not just as a wallet, but as a central pillar of decentralized identity and interaction. The potential for a sooner-than-expected launch adds an element of urgency and excitement, encouraging users to stay informed about every new detail. It represents a significant milestone for a platform that has become synonymous with accessing the decentralized web. Conclusion The hints from ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin regarding an earlier launch for the MetaMask token have undoubtedly captured the attention of the entire crypto world. This potential development promises to bring enhanced governance, utility, and community engagement to millions of MetaMask users. While challenges exist, the underlying potential for a more decentralized and user-driven ecosystem is immense. The coming months will likely reveal more about this highly anticipated token, marking a new chapter for one of Web3’s most vital tools. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is a MetaMask token? A MetaMask token would be a native cryptocurrency issued by ConsenSys, the company behind the MetaMask wallet. It is expected to offer various utilities, including governance rights, rewards, and access to special features within the MetaMask ecosystem. Q2: Why is ConsenSys considering launching a MetaMask token? ConsenSys is likely exploring a token launch to further decentralize the MetaMask platform, empower its user community with governance rights, incentivize active participation, and potentially unlock new forms of utility and growth for the ecosystem. Q3: What benefits could users gain from a MetaMask token? Users could gain several benefits, such as the ability to vote on MetaMask’s future developments, earn rewards for using the wallet, access exclusive features, or potentially reduce transaction fees. It also provides a direct stake in the platform’s success. Q4: When is the MetaMask token expected to launch? While no official launch date has been confirmed, ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin has indicated that the launch could happen sooner than previously expected. The exact timeline remains subject to official announcements from ConsenSys. Q5: How would a MetaMask token impact the broader Web3 ecosystem? A MetaMask token could significantly impact Web3 by setting a precedent for user-owned and governed infrastructure tools. It could drive further decentralization, foster innovation, and strengthen the connection between users and the platforms they rely on, ultimately contributing to a more robust and participatory decentralized internet. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum institutional adoption. This post MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:40
Former Pantera partner launches $300 million SOL vault Solmate in UAE

Former Pantera partner launches $300 million SOL vault Solmate in UAE

PANews reported on September 18 that according to AggrNews, a former Pantera partner leads Solmate in the UAE and manages the $300 million Solana digital asset treasury (DAT).
Share
PANews2025/09/18 21:22