Joerg Hiller
Jan 22, 2026 10:33
Stellar (XLM) Foundation argues open blockchain networks offer superior resilience and regulatory access after October 2025 AWS outage disrupted centralized systems for 15 hours.
The Stellar (XLM) Development Foundation published a policy paper Thursday arguing that open blockchain networks provide stronger legal and operational foundations than private alternatives—a case bolstered by the October 2025 AWS outage that knocked over 1,000 companies offline for 15 hours.
The timing isn’t coincidental. That DNS configuration error on October 20, 2025, cascaded through 113 cloud services, exposing the fragility of centralized infrastructure. For financial institutions running critical operations on affected systems, “inconvenience” doesn’t quite capture the regulatory and operational headaches that followed.
Three Arguments for Open Networks
Stellar’s paper centers on a counterintuitive claim: open blockchains actually enable better regulatory oversight than closed systems. Every transaction sits on a permanent, independently verifiable ledger. Regulators don’t need to request access or trust what a private operator chooses to disclose—they can observe directly.
“This inverts the common compliance concern,” the foundation argues. The real question isn’t whether regulators can see what’s happening on open networks. It’s whether private systems limit visibility to whatever the operator allows.
The competitive neutrality argument targets consortium blockchains specifically. Who decides which institutions get access? What happens when the consortium’s interests diverge from members building on their chain? These aren’t hypothetical concerns for legal teams evaluating infrastructure dependencies.
The Resilience Test
October’s AWS disaster provided a real-world stress test. According to Stellar’s analysis, networks running distributed validators across multiple providers and geographies continued normal operations. Those dependent on single sequencers or concentrated cloud infrastructure degraded or failed entirely.
The distinction matters for institutions requiring 99.99% uptime. Distributed architecture delivers that reliability through redundancy, not through hoping a cloud provider avoids configuration errors.
What This Means for XLM
The paper reads as positioning for institutional adoption rather than retail speculation. Stellar has been pushing its cross-border payments infrastructure to traditional finance players, and framing open networks as the legally defensible choice strengthens that pitch.
For traders, the takeaway is straightforward: Stellar is betting that post-AWS-outage, risk-conscious institutions will prioritize architectural resilience when evaluating blockchain infrastructure. Whether that translates to XLM demand depends on whether compliance officers actually read policy papers.
Image source: Shutterstock
Source: https://blockchain.news/news/stellar-legal-case-open-blockchains-aws-outage
