BlackRock’s 2026 Thematic Outlook put Ethereum at the center of its tokenization thesis, asking whether the network could serve as a “toll road.” BlackRock statedBlackRock’s 2026 Thematic Outlook put Ethereum at the center of its tokenization thesis, asking whether the network could serve as a “toll road.” BlackRock stated

BlackRock backs Ethereum gatekeeping tokenization even though its market share is under threat

BlackRock’s 2026 Thematic Outlook put Ethereum at the center of its tokenization thesis, asking whether the network could serve as a “toll road.”

BlackRock stated that “of tokenized assets 65%+ are on Ethereum.”

The framing pushes Ethereum into an infrastructure role rather than a directional call on ETH. A “toll road” model depends on where issuance, settlement and fee payment occur when real-world assets and tokenized cash move onchain.

Related Reading

Ethereum faces brutal “midlife crisis,” and the Foundation’s response reveals a shocking new reality

A new comms lead, an institutions portal, and “Get in touch” CTAs suggest Ethereum thinks perception is becoming adoption.

Jan 21, 2026 · Gino Matos

BlackRock noted stablecoin transaction volume is adjusted to “strip out inorganic activity (e.g., bots),” citing Coin Metrics and Allium via the Visa Onchain Analytics dashboard.

That caveat narrows the metrics investors may rely on when translating tokenization “activity” into economic throughput.

Ethereum’s share is a moving target

A late-January market check shows why the “65%+” figure should be treated as point-in-time.

Ethereum tokenization (Source: BlackRock)Ethereum tokenization (Source: BlackRock)

RWA.xyz’s directory view put Ethereum’s tokenized RWA market share at 59.84%, with total value around $12.8 billion at retrieval on Jan. 22.

RWA.xyz’s networks view also shows Ethereum leading by value, including a total value (excluding stablecoins) of $13,433,002,447, with the table time-stamped around Jan. 21.

The spread between those readings and BlackRock’s Jan. 5 figure leaves room for share drift.

That drift can come as issuance expands to other chains and as reporting windows change.

Data pointEthereum value / shareTimestamp in sourceSource
BlackRock tokenization slide snapshot“65%+” of tokenized assets on EthereumAs of 1/5/2026BlackRock PDF (p. 17)
RWA.xyz directory overview~$12.8B total value, 59.84% market shareRetrieved 1/22/2026RWA.xyz Directory
RWA.xyz networks table$13,433,002,447 (excl. stablecoins)Table shows “as of” 01/22/2026, pack records as-of 01/21/2026RWA.xyz Networks

For ETH holders, the forward-looking issue is less whether institutions tokenize assets and more whether tokenization routes fee-paying settlement through ETH-bearing paths.

BlackRock’s thesis leans toward Ethereum as a base layer for tokenized assets. Yet a base-layer role can be diluted if execution shifts to rollups or if tokenized funds are distributed across multiple L1s where users do not touch ETH.

Related Reading

Tokenized assets near $300 billion as Wall Street quietly floods on chain

Stablecoins dominate at $267 billion while tokenized Treasuries climb past $7 billion.

Aug 18, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Rollups and fee paths complicate the “toll road” thesis

L2BEAT’s rollup summary shows large pools of value already “secured” by leading Ethereum rollups.

Arbitrum One is listed at $17.52 billion, Base at $12.94 billion, and OP Mainnet at $2.33 billion, each labeled Stage 1.

That architecture can preserve Ethereum’s settlement role while shifting where users pay fees day to day.

Rollup execution economics and fee assets vary by design, and that difference matters for fee capture even if Ethereum remains the underlying security layer.

Tokenized cash may become a major throughput driver in tokenization portfolios, and it comes with clearer scenario math.

Citi’s stablecoin report modeled 2030 issuance at $1.9 trillion in a base case and $4.0 trillion in a bull case.

It paired those balances with a 50x velocity assumption to model roughly $100 trillion and $200 trillion in transaction activity, respectively.

The mechanical implication is that even modest market-share changes in settlement networks can matter if activity scales to those levels.

Measurement methodology becomes central if investors try to infer fee generation from raw on-chain flows.

Related Reading

Citi raises stablecoin market projection to $1.9 trillion by 2030 despite low institutional maturity

The banking giant raised its base case projection from $1.6 trillion in its April 2025 forecast, citing accelerated momentum from regulatory clarity and increased integration of the payment network.

Sep 26, 2025 · Gino Matos

Stablecoin “noise,” multi-chain products and the single-ledger debate

Visa has argued stablecoin transfer volumes contain “noise.”

In an example, Visa said last-30-days stablecoin volume falls from $3.9 trillion to $817.5 billion after removing inorganic activity.

BlackRock’s tokenization slide references the same concept of stripping bots, tying its narrative to a narrower definition of economic use.

If the “toll road” is meant to be monetized through settlement, the investable variable is organic settlement demand that cannot be cheaply replicated elsewhere, not headline transfer counts.

Multi-chain distribution already appears in institutional product design, which complicates any linear “tokenization equals ETH demand” argument.

BlackRock’s tokenized fund BUIDL is available on seven blockchains, with cross-chain interoperability enabled by Wormhole.

This supports a survival path for non-Ethereum chains as distribution and venue-specific utility layers, even if Ethereum retains a lead in issuance value or settlement credibility.

Related Reading

RWA protocols cross $10B in TVL for the first time, sector leads YTD performance

BlackRock's BUIDL leads the RWA market, propelled by over $1 billion investment from Ethena Labs.

Mar 24, 2025 · Gino Matos

A separate strand of the debate has focused on whether institutional tokenization ends in one common ledger.

During Davos week, that theme circulated on social media through posts featuring remarks from BlackRock CEO Larry Fink.

World Economic Forum materials published this month support broader claims about tokenization benefits, including fractionalization and faster settlement themes.

However, the WEF stops short of validating that verbatim “single blockchain” language in its digital assets outlook for 2026 and tokenization explainer video.

For Ethereum’s decentralization thesis, the investable tension is whether a base layer can remain neutral as tokenization becomes tied to large issuers and regulated venues.

“Transparency” claims depend on credible resistance to unilateral change and on settlement finality that downstream layers inherit.

Today, L2BEAT’s stage framework and value-secured data show rollups scaling under Ethereum’s security umbrella, while BUIDL’s multi-chain rollout shows major issuers also reducing platform concentration risk.

BlackRock’s “toll road” slide set a dated market-share marker at 65%+.

Late-January RWA dashboards and multi-chain product releases showed the near-term battlefield is share, settlement location, and measurement of organic usage across the RWA sector.

That same dynamic is likely to shape how investors interpret growth in tokenized Treasuries and other on-chain issuance categories.

The post BlackRock backs Ethereum gatekeeping tokenization even though its market share is under threat appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Trump ally drops bombshell claim GOP 'deliberately' sabotaging him with impeachment plot

Trump ally drops bombshell claim GOP 'deliberately' sabotaging him with impeachment plot

Right-wing conspiracy theorist and activist Laura Loomer unleashed a bombshell claim Friday night that members of the Republican Party are intentionally tanking
Share
Rawstory2026/01/24 09:35
IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration

IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration

The post IBM Qiskit v2.3 Adds C API Expansion for Quantum-HPC Integration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Joerg Hiller Jan 23, 2026 18:06 IBM releases
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/24 09:31
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40