Today, a digital shopfront is no longer a single location. A contemporary high-volume seller will have a fragmented ecosystem comprising global retail platformsToday, a digital shopfront is no longer a single location. A contemporary high-volume seller will have a fragmented ecosystem comprising global retail platforms

Why Multi-Channel AI Agents Define the New Architecture for eCommerce Growth

6 min read

Today, a digital shopfront is no longer a single location. A contemporary high-volume seller will have a fragmented ecosystem comprising global retail platforms (for example, Amazon, eBay), DTC platforms (for example, Shopify), and the exploding social-minded commerce on TikTok’s Shop. The multi-channel approach is imperative to reach the global shopper; however, it creates a logistical nightmare due to fragmented shopping experiences. 

For many years, the industry has used “bolted-on” artificial intelligence, like rudimentary chatbots or automated email-trigger systems tied directly to a single channel. With trade volumes on the rise and a growing number of consumers demanding immediate, round-the-clock service, single-channel tools are becoming unable to provide adequate service. We are witnessing a profound structural transformation in the industry: the era of isolated AI chatbots is coming to an end. The humble chatbot is being replaced by an autonomous AI Agent, a single integrated solution that manages the entire support lifecycle regardless of the origin of the sale. 

How has the collapse of single-channel support changed customer expectations? 

The biggest challenge to scaling an e-commerce operation is fragmentation. Sellers with high sales volumes will need to manage customer interactions across multiple platforms (e.g., websites and e-commerce platforms). They have to log in to all these marketplaces just to respond to repetitive customer queries. When an AI works through only one of these channels/marketplaces, it creates a siloed dataset, preventing the seller from developing a complete picture of their customers. ​ 

Due to this silo, businesses will not have a consistent customer journey and will also operate inefficiently. When a customer support representative is trying to assist, they often need to jump between multiple screens to retrieve a customer’s history on each platform, which consumes company resources and diminishes staff morale. As an example, when demand peaks during Black Friday or the holiday season, ticket volumes go up across all platforms, and the resources available to respond to those tickets are usually found in a siloed format (e.g., website only), resulting in slow response times (e.g., minutes turn into days). ​ 

To remain competitive in this environment, the support architecture needs to be less platform-focused and more customer-focused, meaning there needs to be intelligence above the different channels so the brand can draw on all its order information and policy knowledge as one. 

How are AI agents transitioning into the role of frontline specialists? 

The transition from simple chatbot technology to AI Agents is marking the true beginning of autonomous technology. Where a robotic, script-based chatbot typically exists, AI Agents operate in real time as 24-hour customer service representatives, providing solutions, not just conversations. As of 2025, autonomous models can now manage at least 65% of routine support volume, thereby greatly alleviating the burden on human team members. The continuous learning and dynamism of  AI Agents are driven by access to the brand’s training materials, system processes, and logs of previous interactions (i.e., conversations, business practices, and policy). 

Autonomy in the business sense has far-reaching implications beyond just cutting costs; Autonomy also drives revenue through the immediate conversion of pre-purchase transactions. Many sales are lost because customers ask basic questions about product specifications, and shipping times occur outside normal business hours. By providing instant answers to these questions, a customer service representative eliminates this barrier for all customers interested in buying products at any time, thereby converting all customer service contacts into revenue-producing opportunities.  

The need for quick service is paramount: 90% of consumers say it is essential to receive an immediate response when they enquire about customer service. For merchants seeking to enter international markets, a lack of communication due to language barriers poses a significant challenge. However, thanks to modern technology, brands can now invest in agents who can accurately and effectively translate into numerous languages; this capability enables them to provide support to customers in many different countries without increasing their workforce. Examples of these types of service include repetitive enquiries, such as “what is the status of my order” and “when will my order arrive,” which enable human representatives to provide more complex, high-touch interactions that require a genuine level of care. 

What is the role of an oversight framework in maintaining AI compliance? 

As more businesses turn to autonomous systems to manage customer interactions, the importance of trust in these systems cannot be overstated. AI agents can work effectively only when used within clearly defined boundaries, and for autonomous work to occur, those boundaries must be supported by a robust compliance framework that protects brand safety. For brands to maintain their reputation and build trust with consumers using AI, they need to install systems with built-in confidence thresholds, or guardrails. This is typified by the fact that 64% of brands stated they did not want brands to use AI technology for customer service, thereby defining automation as both transparent and accurate, as essential components for upholding brand reputation. ​ 

Should a request be rated below a certain confidence threshold (e.g., a customer who is emotionally distressed or a technical query the agent has not grappled with before), the automated system will need to pass it to a specialist agent. Additionally, the AI-powered agent will need to provide real-time access to order and transaction data. The use of AI systems that are not directly linked with the company’s order management system can lead to “hallucinations”, which are instances where a highly confident but ultimately inaccurate response has been produced by the system.   

Accurate oversight is achieved through an ongoing loop of feedback between the agents and the system, enabling continual learning from past experiences, increasing response accuracy, and ensuring that all responses are aligned with the corporate brand. This will ensure that businesses have control of their customer experience and regulatory compliance in a fully autonomous environment. ​ 

The evolution of e-commerce has reached a point where an organisation’s ability to support customers via humans is no longer feasible. Simultaneously,  chatbots have not evolved to accommodate the multi-channel nature of trade and beyond. Therefore, brands that generate significant sales volume across multiple platforms will now require a substantial investment in autonomous AI agents. Centralising intelligence and automating tasks will eliminate the fragmentation between marketplace operations and social networks, making a previously disjointed business model cohesive and generating profits for its owners. As we move forward, the objective of every organisation will be to operate in an always-on mode, enabling them to provide answers to customer service enquiries as they arise. 

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders

BitcoinWorld Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders The dynamic world of decentralized finance (DeFi) is constantly evolving, bringing forth new opportunities and innovations. A significant development is currently unfolding at Curve Finance, a leading decentralized exchange (DEX). Its founder, Michael Egorov, has put forth an exciting proposal designed to offer a more direct path for token holders to earn revenue. This initiative, centered around a new Curve Finance revenue sharing model, aims to bolster the value for those actively participating in the protocol’s governance. What is the “Yield Basis” Proposal and How Does it Work? At the core of this forward-thinking initiative is a new protocol dubbed Yield Basis. Michael Egorov introduced this concept on the CurveDAO governance forum, outlining a mechanism to distribute sustainable profits directly to CRV holders. Specifically, it targets those who stake their CRV tokens to gain veCRV, which are essential for governance participation within the Curve ecosystem. Let’s break down the initial steps of this innovative proposal: crvUSD Issuance: Before the Yield Basis protocol goes live, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued. Strategic Fund Allocation: The funds generated from the sale of these crvUSD tokens will be strategically deployed into three distinct Bitcoin-based liquidity pools: WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC. Pool Capping: To ensure balanced risk and diversified exposure, each of these pools will be capped at $10 million. This carefully designed structure aims to establish a robust and consistent income stream, forming the bedrock of a sustainable Curve Finance revenue sharing mechanism. Why is This Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Significant for CRV Holders? This proposal marks a pivotal moment for CRV holders, particularly those dedicated to the long-term health and governance of Curve Finance. Historically, generating revenue for token holders in the DeFi space can often be complex. The Yield Basis proposal simplifies this by offering a more direct and transparent pathway to earnings. By staking CRV for veCRV, holders are not merely engaging in governance; they are now directly positioned to benefit from the protocol’s overall success. The significance of this development is multifaceted: Direct Profit Distribution: veCRV holders are set to receive a substantial share of the profits generated by the Yield Basis protocol. Incentivized Governance: This direct financial incentive encourages more users to stake their CRV, which in turn strengthens the protocol’s decentralized governance structure. Enhanced Value Proposition: The promise of sustainable revenue sharing could significantly boost the inherent value of holding and staking CRV tokens. Ultimately, this move underscores Curve Finance’s dedication to rewarding its committed community and ensuring the long-term vitality of its ecosystem through effective Curve Finance revenue sharing. Understanding the Mechanics: Profit Distribution and Ecosystem Support The distribution model for Yield Basis has been thoughtfully crafted to strike a balance between rewarding veCRV holders and supporting the wider Curve ecosystem. Under the terms of the proposal, a substantial portion of the value generated by Yield Basis will flow back to those who contribute to the protocol’s governance. Returns for veCRV Holders: A significant share, specifically between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis, will be distributed to veCRV holders. This flexible range allows for dynamic adjustments based on market conditions and the protocol’s performance. Ecosystem Reserve: Crucially, 25% of the Yield Basis tokens will be reserved exclusively for the Curve ecosystem. This allocation can be utilized for various strategic purposes, such as funding ongoing development, issuing grants, or further incentivizing liquidity providers. This ensures the continuous growth and innovation of the platform. The proposal is currently undergoing a democratic vote on the CurveDAO governance forum, giving the community a direct voice in shaping the future of Curve Finance revenue sharing. The voting period is scheduled to conclude on September 24th. What’s Next for Curve Finance and CRV Holders? The proposed Yield Basis protocol represents a pioneering approach to sustainable revenue generation and community incentivization within the DeFi landscape. If approved by the community, this Curve Finance revenue sharing model has the potential to establish a new benchmark for how decentralized exchanges reward their most dedicated participants. It aims to foster a more robust and engaged community by directly linking governance participation with tangible financial benefits. This strategic move by Michael Egorov and the Curve Finance team highlights a strong commitment to innovation and strengthening the decentralized nature of the protocol. For CRV holders, a thorough understanding of this proposal is crucial for making informed decisions regarding their staking strategies and overall engagement with one of DeFi’s foundational platforms. FAQs about Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Q1: What is the main goal of the Yield Basis proposal? A1: The primary goal is to establish a more direct and sustainable way for CRV token holders who stake their tokens (receiving veCRV) to earn revenue from the Curve Finance protocol. Q2: How will funds be generated for the Yield Basis protocol? A2: Initially, $60 million in crvUSD will be issued and sold. The funds from this sale will then be allocated to three Bitcoin-based pools (WBTC, cbBTC, and tBTC), with each pool capped at $10 million, to generate profits. Q3: Who benefits from the Yield Basis revenue sharing? A3: The proposal states that between 35% and 65% of the value generated by Yield Basis will be returned to veCRV holders, who are CRV stakers participating in governance. Q4: What is the purpose of the 25% reserve for the Curve ecosystem? A4: This 25% reserve of Yield Basis tokens is intended to support the broader Curve ecosystem, potentially funding development, grants, or other initiatives that contribute to the platform’s growth and sustainability. Q5: When is the vote on the Yield Basis proposal? A5: A vote on the proposal is currently underway on the CurveDAO governance forum and is scheduled to run until September 24th. If you found this article insightful and valuable, please consider sharing it with your friends, colleagues, and followers on social media! Your support helps us continue to deliver important DeFi insights and analysis to a wider audience. To learn more about the latest DeFi market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping decentralized finance institutional adoption. This post Unlocking Massive Value: Curve Finance Revenue Sharing Proposal for CRV Holders first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:35
Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared

Today we compare Pepeto (PEPETO), BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe (and how they stack up today) by the main […] The post Best Crypto To Buy Now: Pepeto vs BlockDAG, Layer Brett, Remittix, Little Pepe, Compared appeared first on Coindoo.
Share
Coindoo2025/09/18 02:39
Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal

BitcoinWorld Solana Price Plummets: SOL Crashes Below $90 in Stunning Market Reversal In a dramatic shift for one of cryptocurrency’s leading networks, Solana (
Share
bitcoinworld2026/02/05 06:45