PANews reported on January 26 that Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated in an article on the X platform that he no longer agrees with his 2017 assertion thatPANews reported on January 26 that Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated in an article on the X platform that he no longer agrees with his 2017 assertion that

Vitalik shifts his view: Blockchain should provide users with a "fallback" mechanism for self-verification.

2026/01/26 10:06

PANews reported on January 26 that Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin stated in an article on the X platform that he no longer agrees with his 2017 assertion that "ordinary users verifying the entire history of the system is a bizarre 'mountain man' fantasy." He explained that he made this assertion at the time to refute the proposal that "blockchain only needs to record the order of transactions and not the state," because the latter would force users to rely on only a single data source.

His shift in perspective stemmed from two core reasons: First, breakthroughs in technologies like ZK-SNARKs enabled users to efficiently verify the chain state without re-executing all transactions, significantly reducing the cost of self-verification. Second, he gained a deeper understanding of the complexities of the real world, including network risks, service disruptions, and potential threats of attacks and censorship. Therefore, a blockchain system aiming for long-term self-custody must provide users with a reliable and trustless "fallback"—the self-verification capability metaphorically represented by the "Mountain Hut." He emphasized that maintaining this capability is not about advocating for daily use, but about ensuring its availability during crises, serving as the cornerstone for enhancing the resilience of the entire system and user autonomy.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) Completes Move To $0.00020688

Husky Inu (HINU) has completed its latest price jump, rising from $0.00020628 to $0.00020688. The price jump is part of the project’s pre-launch phase, which began on April 1, 2025.
Share
Cryptodaily2025/09/18 01:10
Haier Shines at Australian Open 2026: Official Partner Elevates the Game with Smart Innovation and Purpose

Haier Shines at Australian Open 2026: Official Partner Elevates the Game with Smart Innovation and Purpose

MELBOURNE, Australia, Jan. 25, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Haier, the world’s No.1 major home appliance brand, continues its strategic partnership with the Australian Open
Share
AI Journal2026/01/26 11:30