Urmila Shukla lives in Bagrahiya village of Shravasti district, where her workday begins early and often stretches late into the night.Urmila Shukla lives in Bagrahiya village of Shravasti district, where her workday begins early and often stretches late into the night.

How consistent stitching built a small business in Shravasti district

Urmila Shukla lives in Bagruiya village of Shravasti district, where her workday begins early and often stretches late into the night. Today, she runs a small tailoring shop called Kirti Silai Centre, but the path to a stable storefront was gradual, shaped by years of learning, domestic responsibilities, and cautious decisions taken at different stages of her life.

Shukla learned stitching as a teenager while she was still studying. Training outside her village, before marriage brought her to Shravasti. Formal education was halted after the shift, but the skill stayed with her. For years, she worked from home, using a single machine to stitch clothes for neighbours and acquaintances who came with small, routine requests. At the time, the work was modest and fitted around household duties, with no clear plan to turn it into a business.

Over time, word spread beyond the village. Clothes began arriving from nearby localities and the volume of work grew enough for her to consider a separate space. The decision to move out of the house was not immediate. Her husband was away working and the family weighed the risk of rent against uncertain income. Eventually, a small shop was rented, and she began by offering stitching services, enough to cover basic expenses and keep the space running.

Turning skill into a livelihood

The shop became a turning point. As more customers flocked in from five or six neighbouring villages, Shukla found that a dedicated workspace allowed her to manage larger orders and tighter timelines. She stitches women’s garments, including salwar suits, blouses, petticoats, and trousers, handling the work herself and setting her own hours based on demand. Trust, she says, became the defining factor. Customers returned because orders were completed on time, often without regard to her own schedule.

Early doubters suggested the shop would not last. The first few months were financially tight, with rent payments a constant worry. Still, she persevered, testing designs on her own clothes before accepting unfamiliar patterns and gradually built confidence with each completed order. “I kept thinking that if I don’t stop now, the work will slowly find its way,” she said.

Support came later through the Mukhyamantri Yuva Udyami Vikas Abhiyan (CM YUVA) Yojana, which helped her improve the shop’s setup and add basic inventory alongside tailoring. Under the CM Yuva Yojana, the assistance was used to strengthen what already existed rather than start afresh, enabling her to better respond to customer needs and manage the growing workload.

Stability built stitch by stitch

Four years into running the shop, Shukla’s days are long but predictable. She opens early, often works past midnight during peak periods, and handles all orders herself. Customers now come from farther away, including migrants living nearby, who rely on her for dependable work. The shop has become a well-established stop in the area, not because it expanded quickly, but because it remained consistent.

Looking back, the transition from a single machine at home to a functioning shop feels less like a leap and more like a series of small, steady steps. The early uncertainty, the pressure of rent, and the careful use of support have settled into a routine that sustains both the business and the household, offering a sense of continuity rooted in skill and persistence, rather than sudden change.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
ePIC Blockchain Technologies Reduces UMC OS Development Fee to 1.5%, Extending Institutional-Grade Optimization Across Mining Fleets

ePIC Blockchain Technologies Reduces UMC OS Development Fee to 1.5%, Extending Institutional-Grade Optimization Across Mining Fleets

TORONTO, Jan. 26, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — ePIC Blockchain Technologies (“ePIC”), a North American semiconductor and high-performance computing engineering company,
Share
AI Journal2026/01/26 22:15
PCO: Marcos schedule back on track

PCO: Marcos schedule back on track

PHILIPPINE President Ferdinand R. Marcos, Jr. is now “back to normal” schedule following his brief hospitalization last week, the Presidential Communications Office
Share
Bworldonline2026/01/26 21:16