The justice committee has a maximum of 60 session days to reach a decision on the impeachment complaints against the PresidentThe justice committee has a maximum of 60 session days to reach a decision on the impeachment complaints against the President

Step-by-step guide to the impeachment process that awaits Marcos

2026/01/27 14:26
4 min read

The impeachment proceedings against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. — the first since he assumed office in 2022 — have been green-lit, triggered by the referral of two complaints to the justice committee.

What happens next? The House rules handbook provides a guide to his impeachment process.

The process will be different from what Vice President Sara Duterte faced in February 2025, since the latter’s impeachment was the product of a constitutionally valid shortcut: at least one-third of Congress signed the articles of impeachment, tantamount to their endorsement of the complaint.

This meant that Duterte’s impeachment complaint no longer had to go through the justice committee, and was immediately transmitted to the Senate for a trial that was ultimately botched amid Supreme Court intervention.

In Marcos’ case, the two complaints against him had a cumulative total of four lawmaker-endorsers. Because the one-third signature requirement to avail of the fast mode was not met, Marcos will go through the long method of impeachment.

Rappler lists a step-by-step guide for Marcos’ impeachment process.

  • The justice committee will convene to consolidate the two complaints endorsed separately by Pusong Pinoy Representative Jett Nisay and the three-member Makabayan bloc, according to committee chairperson Gerville Luistro.
  • The committee will determine whether the complaint is sufficient in form. If it is not, the complaint will be sent back to the Office of the Secretary General with a written explanation on why it is insufficient. The complaint is considered dismissed.
  • If the complaint is sufficient in form, the committee will then determine whether it is sufficient in substance — this includes a decision on whether the facts constituting the offenses charged are articulated properly. The complaint is considered dismissed if it does not pass this test.
  • If the complaint is sufficient in form and substance, the justice committee will send Marcos a copy of the complaint.
  • Marcos has 10 days to file an answer to the complaint. It may include affirmative defenses. If he chooses not to respond to the allegations, he would be assumed to be denying the accusations.
  • The complainants have three days from receipt of Marcos’ answer to file a reply.
  • Marcos has another three days from the receipt of the complainants’ reply to file a rejoinder.

During this period of submissions, the parties shall file their affidavits and counter-affidavits together with documentary evidence.

  • After the submission of all the relevant documents, the justice committee shall determine whether the complaint alleges sufficient grounds for impeachment. If it does not, the case will be dismissed.
  • If the complaint alleges sufficient grounds for impeachment, the justice committee will conduct a public hearing to examine witnesses who will be invited, and documents that will be produced.
  • The committee, before it makes a decision, may require parties to submit memoranda after the submission of evidence.
  • After hearing the evidence, the committee will vote on whether or not probable cause for impeachment exists. If a majority of lawmakers vote in favor of the complaint, the report that they will submit to the plenary will constitute the articles of impeachment. If the complaint fails to get majority support from lawmakers, it will be dismissed.

It is important to note that the justice committee has a maximum of 60 session days to decide on the impeachment complaint. However, session days are different from calendar days. Three calendar days, for example, may count as one session day only.

  • Once the committee report is submitted to the plenary, the rules committee, chaired by the majority leader, has a maximum of 60 session days to dispose of the report.

Take note that the President’s son, Ilocos Norte 1st District Representative Sandro Marcos, is the majority leader, although he has said he will inhibit from impeachment proceedings against his father.

  • The House will vote on the articles of impeachment in the plenary. If at least one-third of the House (around 106 lawmakers) votes in favor of the articles of impeachment, it is considered approved, and Marcos is considered impeached. If that number isn’t met, the report is dismissed. (If the committee report forwarded to the plenary junks the complaint, a one-third vote in the plenary can also override the dismissal.)
  • If the articles of impeachment hurdle the House, they will be transmitted to the Senate, which will hold a trial to determine whether Marcos should be convicted or acquitted. Marcos will be removed from office only if he gets a conviction.

It is important to note that if the complaints are dismissed whether in the early or final stages of the proceeding, Marcos will get a one-year immunity against another impeachment effort.

Luistro told reporters that the committee will meet for the first time on February 2, a Monday. – Rappler.com

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

eurosecurity.net Expands Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery Capabilities Amid Rising Investor Losses

eurosecurity.net Expands Cryptocurrency Asset Recovery Capabilities Amid Rising Investor Losses

New York, NY/ GlobePRWire / Feb 6, 2026 – eurosecurity.net announces the expansion of its cryptocurrency asset recovery services, reflecting increased demand from
Share
CryptoReporter2026/02/06 17:24
Ethereum to boost scalability and roll out Fusaka upgrade on Dec 3

Ethereum to boost scalability and roll out Fusaka upgrade on Dec 3

Ethereum's Fusaka update may happen on December 3, based on the date set in the latest developer call.
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/19 17:00
Google Cloud taps EigenLayer to bring trust to agentic payments

Google Cloud taps EigenLayer to bring trust to agentic payments

The post Google Cloud taps EigenLayer to bring trust to agentic payments appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Two days after unveiling AP2 — a universal payment layer for AI agents that supports everything from credit cards to stablecoins — Google and EigenLayer have released details of their partnership to bring verifiability and restaking security to the stack, using Ethereum. In addition to enabling verifiable compute and slashing-backed payment coordination, EigenCloud will support insured and sovereign AI agents, which introduce consequences for failure or deviation from specified behavior. Sovereign agents are positioned as autonomous actors that can own property, make decisions, and execute actions independently — think smart contracts with embedded intelligence. From demos to dollars AP2 extends Google’s agent-to-agent (A2A) protocol using the HTTP 402 status code — long reserved for “payment required” — to standardize payment requests between agents across different networks. It already supports stablecoins like USDC, and Coinbase has demoed an agent checkout using its Wallet-as-a-Service. Paired with a system like Lit Protocol’s Vincent — which enforces per-action policies and key custody at signing — Google’s AP2 with EigenCloud’s verifiability and cross-chain settlement could form an end-to-end trust loop. Payments between agents aren’t as simple as they are often made to sound by “Crypto x AI” LARPs. When an AI agent requests a payment in USDC on Base and the payer’s funds are locked in ETH on Arbitrum, the transaction stalls — unless something abstracts the bridging, swapping and delivery. That’s where EigenCloud comes in. Sreeram Kannan, founder of EigenLayer, said the integration will create agents that not only run on-chain verifiable compute, but are also economically incentivized to behave within programmable bounds. Through restaked operators, EigenCloud powers a verifiable payment service that handles asset routing and chain abstraction, with dishonest behavior subject to slashing. It also introduces cryptographic accountability to the agents themselves, enabling proofs that an agent actually executed the task it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 03:52