Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner tells the Washington Monthly that there’s plenty of evidence to put before a grand jury regarding the Minneapolis killingsPhiladelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner tells the Washington Monthly that there’s plenty of evidence to put before a grand jury regarding the Minneapolis killings

Indictments coming for federal agents in Minneapolis killings: expert

2026/01/29 06:07
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner tells the Washington Monthly that there’s plenty of evidence to put before a grand jury regarding the Minneapolis killings.

“Despite the limited information available, the video is very damning. And the apparent cover-up by the feds cannot erase that video,” said Krasner, who was impeached by the Republican-controlled Pennsylvania House of Representatives in 2021 over his progressive criminal justice policies and as a backlash to racial unrest following the murder of George Floyd. Krasner was soon re-elected with more than 70 percent of the vote.

“Any great prosecutor, which [Hennepin County Attorney] Mary Moriarty is, wants all the facts. I have no doubt she is trying hard to get all the facts. … But the outrage over what was done to Alex Pretti says a lot about what a jury would do,” Krasner said.

Krasner added that he would not hesitate to bring charges were he in Moriarty’s position, with access to the same evidence Moriarty has. Moreover, he said Moriarty has nothing to fear in bringing charges against federal officials for their role in the shooting death of two Minneapolis residents.

“[Moriarty] has been maligned, abused, and mistreated by the right, and she’s not running again,” said Krasner. “Not running again is often good news when you want a prosecutor who’s going to do something difficult, because politics enter into it less. … There is enough information in the publicly available video to establish probable cause, bring the case, and present it to a jury.”

Unique in this prosecutorial situation, however, is the fact that the federal government is a hostile party to the indictment, despite federal actions overwhelmingly playing a part in the death of its own citizens. Prosecutors rarely have to ask how hard it will be to get a writ of mandamus from a court order compelling DHS to turn over evidence.

“One of the challenges here is that this is relatively uncharted territory,” said Krasner. “Usually, the federal government reins in unruly local law enforcement. Here, the script is flipped. There isn’t a lot of precedent, and it will matter a great deal which judge is assigned.”

But Krasner said it likely won’t be hard to find a fair judge in Minnesota who’s not trying to cover the federal government’s backside. Helping matters is the Tenth Amendment, which projects a strong state interest in prosecuting crimes that occur within a state’s jurisdiction.

But expect the federal government to lie, and lie a lot, warned Krasner.

“We’ve already seen one lie after another from federal authorities. Even Trump stated that this federal officer was ‘rammed’ by a vehicle. That appears to be false,” said Krasner. “There’s a real possibility that if you dig into the paperwork, you’ll find ICE agents or officials lying. Those are crimes under state law in almost every jurisdiction. You can’t lie to the police, even if you are the police. You can’t lie to law enforcement.”

That brings up the inevitable possibility of an additional set of charges and criminal liability for hiding information. And despite the administration’s claims, qualified immunity is not a thing.

Another tidbit of information: Any convictions arising of this particular prosecution qualify as state crimes.

“The president cannot pardon state crimes,” Krasner said.

Read the Washington Monthly report at this link.

  • george conway
  • noam chomsky
  • civil war
  • Kayleigh mcenany
  • Melania trump
  • drudge report
  • paul krugman
  • Lindsey graham
  • Lincoln project
  • al franken bill maher
  • People of praise
  • Ivanka trump
  • eric trump
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
When the Middle East burns, the Filipino nanay feels the heat

When the Middle East burns, the Filipino nanay feels the heat

(Part 1 of 2) On Feb. 28, the world watched as the US-Israel coalition launched coordinated airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure, which also
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/16 00:03
The Hidden Costs of a Smart Home: How to Calculate Your Real Electricity Usage

The Hidden Costs of a Smart Home: How to Calculate Your Real Electricity Usage

You just finished setting up your smart home. The lights respond to your voice. The thermostat adjusts itself. The security cameras check in every few minutes.
Share
Techbullion2026/03/16 02:35