The post Netflix’s Murder Mystery Is A Major Letdown appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. His & Hers Credit: Netflix I was really hoping that a new murder mysteryThe post Netflix’s Murder Mystery Is A Major Letdown appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. His & Hers Credit: Netflix I was really hoping that a new murder mystery

Netflix’s Murder Mystery Is A Major Letdown

5 min read

His & Hers

Credit: Netflix

I was really hoping that a new murder mystery starring Jon Bernthal and Tessa Thompson would be a Netflix winner, but after a solid enough start, His & Hers goes downhill fast. There’s a murder mystery here, with some twists and turns along the way, and also a story about an estranged married couple dealing with the grief of losing a child. But the actual detective work is almost nonexistent and I never connected with any of the characters enough to really care about their personal struggles. It’s also weirdly reminiscent of a much better show: HBO’s excellent Sharp Objects, starring Amy Adams.

Both shows follow a news reporter sent to a small town – Dahlonega, Georgia in His & Hers and the fictional Wind Gap in Sharp Objects – where a brutal murder has taken place. These reporters are both from the town in question. Their families are still around. The towns haven’t changed much, and skeletons reside in every closet.

Both are also adaptations of novels. Sharp Objects was adapted from Gillian Flynn’s 2006 debut novel of the same name. His & Hers is adapted from Alice Feeney’s 2020 novel of the same name, though Feeney’s story takes place in the UK. Whether or not His & Hers is derivative, it feels that way watching.

There are some big differences, of course. Sharp Objects is a Southern gothic murder mystery that’s absolutely gripping from start to finish, with incredible writing and performances across the board. His & Hers is a generic mystery that tries hard to shock its audience, but is ultimately both predictable and, with its big twist at the end, laughably implausible.

His & Hers

Credit: Netflix

The other big difference is the husband. Thompson plays journalist Anna Harper, who left her husband and hometown and disappeared for a year after the death of her child. Bernthal plays her husband, Jack Harper, a detective with the Sheriff’s department. Both have ties to the victim and as the story unfolds, their involvement becomes increasingly suspicious. This is as much a story about the rocky marriage of Anna and Jack as it is a murder mystery.

This draws focus away from a single protagonist who we can relate to, and it’s done so that the audience will question the reliability of our leads. This has the unfortunate consequence of making both Anna and Jack paper-thin caricatures of the ambitious reporter and small town cop.

The limited series scratches the surface of Anna’s past and a deeply troubling event that she experienced in high school. This event, we discover, is central to the murders now taking place in Dahlonega. This might have worked better if Anna were the main character, rather than Jack. It’s also eerily similar to Sharp Objects, which is all about Camille (Adams) reckoning with her past and her hypochondriac mother and how everything is tied together in order to make sense of what’s going on in the present.

While I enjoyed the first couple episodes of His & Hers, it went downhill quickly. Bernthal’s Jack becomes increasingly impulsive and unhinged. Only his partner does any real detective work. It was billed as some kind of rivalry between Anna and Jack, with each suspecting that the other was behind the murders, but this was never really the case. They clash endlessly over their past and estrangement, but neither seems to think the other was truly responsible for any murders.

His & Hers

Credit: Netflix

In many ways, His & Hers felt like it had no idea what kind of murder mystery it actually wanted to be. Jack barely pays attention to the investigation, ignoring key details that would have helped him put two and two together. He makes wild accusations against the husband of the first victim that make his character seem weak and pathetic. Anna’s motivations are bizarre and confusing. I wouldn’t mind so much if Jack’s mental state actually made sense, or Anna’s characterization was less fuzzy. The show needed to either lean harder into the idea that one of these people was the killer, or just toss that angle out entirely and focus on delivering a good mystery.

One of the first big twists toward the end turns out to be a red herring, but the twist itself is so absurd and nonsensical, so utterly unlikely and coincidental, that the only reason you might not think about it too much is the even more ludicrous twist that comes right after. I won’t spoil any of it here, but I was rolling my eyes throughout the entire last episode (or two) and by the end, by the final reveal, I wanted the last six hours of my life back.

Bad dialogue, phoned in performances and a bafflingly amateurish script make this an easy skip on Netflix. You’d be much better off watching Sharp Objects or, if you don’t have HBO, check out Lupin, Dept Q or Giri/Haji on Netflix.

Did you watch His & Hers? Did you enjoy it? Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook.

I also recently reviewed the cat-and-mouse UK crime thriller, The Game, which I found only slightly less ridiculous than His & Hers.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2026/01/29/his-and-hers-netflix-series-review/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19