For yet another reminder of what a poor job Kristi Noem is doing, just ask her handpicked replacement as governor of South Dakota.Not directly, mind you. Larry For yet another reminder of what a poor job Kristi Noem is doing, just ask her handpicked replacement as governor of South Dakota.Not directly, mind you. Larry

Kristi Noem's own handpicked replacement called her out without even knowing it

For yet another reminder of what a poor job Kristi Noem is doing, just ask her handpicked replacement as governor of South Dakota.

Not directly, mind you. Larry Rhoden will defend her to the hilt if asked about her by name.

But ask him indirectly, or just let him talk awhile, and he’ll criticize her actions without even realizing he’s doing it.

That happened often during the beginning of his tenure as governor, when he spoke repeatedly about the need for a “reset” on nearly every important issue in the state, even while claiming Noem did a wonderful job as his predecessor.

Another prime example popped up Thursday during a news conference at the South Dakota Capitol in Pierre.

A reporter asked Rhoden about nationwide criticism of Noem’s response to fatal shootings in Minneapolis. The federal agents who fired the guns work for Noem, who leads the Department of Homeland Security, which has been conducting immigration enforcement activities with thousands of agents in Minneapolis for weeks.

Rhoden, who ascended from lieutenant governor to governor last year when Noem got her new job, said the two of them still communicate via text messages.

“I’ve tried to encourage her because I know she’s got a tough, tough job,” Rhoden said. “And I still think she’s up to the task.”

Moments later, another reporter told Rhoden about comments from South Dakota Democratic legislative leaders. They expressed disappointment about the silence from Republican leaders regarding the most recent fatal shooting by federal agents in Minneapolis, who took the life of 37-year-old Alex Pretti.

Asked if he wanted to comment on Pretti’s death, Rhoden answered: “I don’t.”

Five or so awkward seconds of silence passed after that, and Rhoden’s press secretary tried to end the press conference. But Rhoden interjected, “Let me just clarify a little bit with that.”

“There’s all kinds of information that I am not aware of, so why would I make a comment basing my opinion with no grounding in fact?” Rhoden said, in part. “And I think that’s a big part of the problem that we face in some of these issues is people jumping to conclusions and then standing their ground and making absurd statements based on conjecture.”

So, in other words, exactly what Noem did.

Within hours of Pretti’s death, Noem went to a podium and proclaimed, “This looks like a situation where an individual arrived at the scene to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement.”

She also said Pretti committed “an act of domestic terrorism.”

Many of us have seen the bystander videos, which show Pretti carrying a cellphone and attempting to assist someone who was pushed down by federal agents. Those agents then wrestled Pretti to the ground. The videos appear to show an agent removing a handgun — which Pretti had a permit to carry — from Pretti’s hip just before other agents opened fire.

Rhoden is exactly right. To come out within hours of Pretti’s death, before all the facts were known, and proclaim him a domestic terrorist intent on killing law enforcement was irresponsible.

So is Rhoden’s blind defense of Noem, even as he seems to recognize on some level that her actions are antithetical to his own values.

  • Seth is editor-in-chief of South Dakota Searchlight. He was previously a supervising senior producer for South Dakota Public Broadcasting and a newspaper journalist in Rapid City and Mitchell. South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Red state gov candidate claims Don Lemon 'lucky' he wasn't lynched

Red state gov candidate claims Don Lemon 'lucky' he wasn't lynched

Journalist Don Lemon's arrest and indictment by the Trump administration promoted howls of outrage from press figures around the country on Friday — but as far
Share
Rawstory2026/01/31 10:44
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39
Tumbling market sets giants into ‘plunge protection’ mode: Crypto Daybook Americas

Tumbling market sets giants into ‘plunge protection’ mode: Crypto Daybook Americas

The post Tumbling market sets giants into ‘plunge protection’ mode: Crypto Daybook Americas appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. :Crypto Daybook Americas By Omkar
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/31 10:18