Address poison attackers have stolen 4,556 ETH ($12.25 million) from a single victim after an earlier attack cost a trader $50 million in December last year.  AnAddress poison attackers have stolen 4,556 ETH ($12.25 million) from a single victim after an earlier attack cost a trader $50 million in December last year.  An

A single crypto victim lost $12.25 million in ETH after falling for an "address poisoning" scam

Address poison attackers have stolen 4,556 ETH ($12.25 million) from a single victim after an earlier attack cost a trader $50 million in December last year. 

An unlucky cryptocurrency victim recently lost 4,556 ETH, valued at $12.25 million, to a sophisticated “address poisoning” attack. The incident was reported by the blockchain security platform Scam Sniffer.

Traders are now being warned to never copy addresses from their transaction history due to an increase in address poisoning scams.

How do scammers use ‘address poisoning’ to steal millions?

Overall, there has been a record-breaking surge in crypto theft, including a nearly $50 million loss in December 2025 and over 1 million poisoning attempts being detected every day on the Ethereum network.

The victim, using the address 0xd6741220a947941bF290799811FcDCeA8AE4A7Da, intended to send funds to a legitimate contact. However, they unknowingly copied a “poisoned” address from their transfer history.

The scammer’s address (0x6d9052b2DF589De00324127fe2707eb34e592e48) was specifically designed to look like the correct one (0x6D90CC8Ce83B6D0ACf634ED45d4bCc37eDdD2E48).

Address poisoning attacks take advantage of human error, and how crypto wallets display addresses for easier viewing. For example, an address might be shown as 0x6D90…2E48. Scammers use powerful software to generate millions of “vanity” addresses until they find one that matches those first and last few characters.

Once they have a matching address, they send a tiny amount of crypto or even a transaction with zero value to a user’s wallet, which puts the scammer’s address into their recent history. The next time the user attempts to copy that address from their history, they could very easily mistake the scammer’s address for the correct one.

Once sent, the money is gone forever because blockchain transactions cannot be reversed.

Security experts from companies like Cyvers and Immunefi report that these attacks are now happening at an industrial scale.

In January 2026, Ethereum transactions hit an all-time high of over 2.8 million per day, and analysts from Citi believe a large portion of this activity is caused by scammers sending millions of these “poison” transactions to catch a few unlucky victims.

Other major crypto thefts have happened recently

Another trader lost nearly $50 million (49,999,950 USDT) in a similar poisoning attack back in December 2025. In that case, the victim even sent a “test transaction” of 50 USDT to be safe. However, the scammer’s automated script immediately saw the test and “poisoned” the history before the victim could send the remaining $50 million. The attacker quickly converted the stolen funds into DAI and then ETH to prevent the money from being frozen.

On January 21, 2026, the Saga EVM blockchain had to be paused after a hack drained $7 million. Earlier in January, the Truebit protocol lost $26.6 million in ETH when an attacker exploited an older security hole in its system, sending the token’s price crashing by nearly 100%.

Even larger organizations like the French crypto tax platform called Waltio received a ransom demand from the ShinyHunters hacker group, which was claiming to have stolen data from 50,000 users.

In 2025 alone, over $17 billion was stolen through various scams. Chainalysis reports that “impersonation scams,” which include address poisoning, grew by a staggering 1,400% compared to the year before.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

[Time Trowel] Zamboanga City and ‘Chief of War’

[Time Trowel] Zamboanga City and ‘Chief of War’

Zamboanga's importance never came from being a center that pulled everything inward, but from being a place where connections met and continued.
Share
Rappler2026/02/01 10:00
SUI At The Smart Money Zone: Big Moves Brewing Above $2

SUI At The Smart Money Zone: Big Moves Brewing Above $2

The post SUI At The Smart Money Zone: Big Moves Brewing Above $2 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SUI is approaching a critical smart money zone, with price
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/01 10:00
Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token

The post Headwind Helps Best Wallet Token appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Google has announced the launch of a new open-source protocol called Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) in partnership with Coinbase, the Ethereum Foundation, and 60 other organizations. This allows AI agents to make payments on behalf of users using various methods such as real-time bank transfers, credit and debit cards, and, most importantly, stablecoins. Let’s explore in detail what this could mean for the broader cryptocurrency markets, and also highlight a presale crypto (Best Wallet Token) that could explode as a result of this development. Google’s Push for Stablecoins Agent Payments Protocol (AP2) uses digital contracts known as ‘Intent Mandates’ and ‘Verifiable Credentials’ to ensure that AI agents undertake only those payments authorized by the user. Mandates, by the way, are cryptographically signed, tamper-proof digital contracts that act as verifiable proof of a user’s instruction. For example, let’s say you instruct an AI agent to never spend more than $200 in a single transaction. This instruction is written into an Intent Mandate, which serves as a digital contract. Now, whenever the AI agent tries to make a payment, it must present this mandate as proof of authorization, which will then be verified via the AP2 protocol. Alongside this, Google has also launched the A2A x402 extension to accelerate support for the Web3 ecosystem. This production-ready solution enables agent-based crypto payments and will help reshape the growth of cryptocurrency integration within the AP2 protocol. Google’s inclusion of stablecoins in AP2 is a massive vote of confidence in dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies and a huge step toward making them a mainstream payment option. This widens stablecoin usage beyond trading and speculation, positioning them at the center of the consumption economy. The recent enactment of the GENIUS Act in the U.S. gives stablecoins more structure and legal support. Imagine paying for things like data crawls, per-task…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:27