The post Bitcoin ETFs suffer $7 billion in losses as outflows accelerate appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s slide below $80,000 has pushed a significantThe post Bitcoin ETFs suffer $7 billion in losses as outflows accelerate appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin’s slide below $80,000 has pushed a significant

Bitcoin ETFs suffer $7 billion in losses as outflows accelerate

6 min read

Bitcoin’s slide below $80,000 has pushed a significant portion of US spot BTC exchange-traded fund (ETF) buyers into $7 billion in paper losses.

According to CryptoSlate’s data, the world’s largest digital asset fell to as low as $74,609 over the weekend amid liquidity concerns and a risk-off tone in global markets. BTC has recovered to approximately $77,649 as of press time.

Alex Thorn, Galaxy Digital’s head of research, noted that this price performance indicates that Bitcoin is trading below the average cost basis of US ETFs. Notably, spot Bitcoin ETF investors are holding average paper losses of approximately 15%, implying an average entry price of approximately $90,200 per Bitcoin.

Bitcoin ETFs Cost Basis (Source: Galaxy Research)
Related Reading

Global markets crash as everything including Bitcoin sells off at once erasing trillions

Over $800 million in long positions were wiped out in minutes as the US open turned into a brutal liquidity bloodbath for unsuspecting traders.

Jan 29, 2026 · Liam ‘Akiba’ Wright

That setup can change behavior. Unlike self-custody buyers, who often tolerate sharp swings, ETF holders include advisers and allocators who rebalance according to predefined portfolio rules. When the average holder is down, rallies can run into “sell-to-even” selling.

When prices fall again, some investors reduce exposure to mitigate risk, especially if volatility rises and Bitcoin continues to move in step with equities.

Considering this, some industry experts argued that the significant drawdown raises the stakes about whether the current redemption streak from the 12 ETF products will evolve from a tactical pause into a sustained market headwind.

Who’s underwater, and by how much?

The extent of the damage is becoming clearer through on-chain and fund-flow analyses.

Jim Bianco of Bianco Research highlighted that the 12 spot Bitcoin ETFs now hold approximately 1.29 million Bitcoin, worth over $115 billion. These funds collectively hold roughly 6.5% of all Bitcoin in circulation.

When combined with the corporate treasury of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), the ETF holdings represent 10% of all Bitcoin.

However, their entry points differ drastically. Strategy has been buying Bitcoin since 2020, averaging $76,020 per purchase, leaving it with an unrealized profit of just $1.17 billion, down from over $30 billion last October.

In contrast, the ETF investors arrived later and paid higher prices.

Bianco noted that the 12-spot Bitcoin ETFs have an average purchase price of approximately $90,200, approximately $13,000 (16%) above current prices.

Bitcoin ETFs Average Purchase Price (Source: Jim Bianco)

Combined, the average purchase price of the ETFs is $85,360, indicating an average loss of approximately $8,000. This represents an unrealized loss of approximately $7 billion for these investors.

Essentially, that places the average Bitcoin ETF buyer underwater.

James Check of Checkonchain added another layer of nuance, stating that if one assumes a cost basis of inflows on the day they occurred, 62% of ETF inflows are now underwater.

Bitcoin ETFs Weekly Flows in Profit and Loss (Source: CheckOnChain)

US Bitcoin ETFs are bleeding funds

Meanwhile, the Bitcoin ETF holders’ losses have arrived alongside a pronounced shift in capital flows.

Across the 12 spot Bitcoin ETFs, net outflows have totaled roughly $6.18 billion from November 2025 through January 2026. This is the longest monthly outflow streak since these products launched in 2024.

Related Reading

How Bitcoin ETFs lost a whole year of inflows – now down $48B since October

Assets have crashed back to 2024 levels, wiping out a year of growth despite massive buy-side pressure.

Dec 5, 2025 · Liam ‘Akiba’ Wright

Notably, the redemptions have been punctuated by large daily drawdowns.

For context, SoSo Value data show that the products recorded net redemptions totaling more than $1.3 billion in the last two trading days of January, alongside a 9-day outflow streak, punctuated by a modest inflow of $6.3 million.

When outflows occur in bursts, the market has less time to absorb the supply, which can exacerbate intraday volatility. In episodes like this, Bitcoin often trades like a high-beta macro asset.

Essentially, the outflows represent a reversal of fortunes for BTC ETFs, which had previously been a consistent source of demand for the leading cryptocurrency.

How much Bitcoin the market must swallow

The forward question for the market is basic supply-and-demand math: what happens to Bitcoin’s price discovery if the outflow trend persists?

If the ETF complex continues to shed more than $6 billion every three months, the implied monthly pace is approximately $2 billion in net outflows.

CryptoSlate Daily Brief

Daily signals, zero noise.

Market-moving headlines and context delivered every morning in one tight read.

5-minute digest 100k+ readers

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Whoops, looks like there was a problem. Please try again.

You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.

At a hypothetical $75,000 Bitcoin price, this corresponds to roughly 27,000-28,000 BTC per month that other buyers must absorb.

If prices fall, the same dollar outflow corresponds to more BTC, thereby increasing the amount that must be absorbed elsewhere.

That figure looks even larger when compared with Bitcoin’s post-halving issuance schedule. The 2024 halving reduced the block reward to 3.125 BTC, leaving the average new supply at approximately 450 BTC per day, or roughly 13,500 BTC per month.

Sustained ETF redemptions at the recent pace would therefore amount to a supply equivalent to about two months of new issuance every single month.

Unless other demand sources re-emerge, this imbalance can weigh on sentiment and further depress the BTC price.

Why selling can feed more selling

The relationship between ETF flows and price action is statistically significant, and the buyer mix helps explain this relationship.

A report from K33 Research last year found that Bitcoin’s price remains closely tied to ETF flows, with an R-squared of 0.80, accounting for approximately 80% of the variance in 30-day BTC returns.

Bianco pointed to the average trade size as a reality check on who is actually driving activity in these funds. While the average trade for the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is $111,300 and the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is $87,000, the average trade for Bitcoin ETFs is just $15,800.

According to him, that profile appears more like brokerage retail than long-duration institutional positioning.

Average Trade Size of a Bitcoin ETF Holder (Source: Bianco Research)

If the marginal ETF holder, like Bianco pointed out, is more retail-like, flows can become more “price-driven.”

In plain terms: when prices fall, more investors may decide to get out, and those exits show up as redemptions. Redemptions then force sponsors to sell spot Bitcoin to meet cash withdrawals, which can push the price down again.

Considering this, CryptoSlate’s analysis suggests the mid-$75,000s could provide support if buyers step in.

If the Bitcoin price holds those areas and flows stabilize, ETFs could revert from being a source of supply to a marginal buyer again. This would reduce the mechanical supply overhang and potentially dampen market volatility.

However, if outflows persist, BTC could face significant headwinds that could further depress its price. Alphractal CEO Joao Wedson noted that the next major support level for BTC is approximately $65,500 in such scenarios.

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/bitcoin-triggers-7b-loss-for-etf-holders-as-price-could-drop-to-65000-while-strategy-mstr-sits-on-billion-dollar-cushion/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55