Bitcoin’s slide below $80,000 has pushed a significant portion of US spot BTC exchange-traded fund (ETF) buyers into $7 billion in paper losses. According to CryptoSlateBitcoin’s slide below $80,000 has pushed a significant portion of US spot BTC exchange-traded fund (ETF) buyers into $7 billion in paper losses. According to CryptoSlate

Bitcoin triggers $7B loss for ETF holders as price could drop to $65,000 while Strategy (MSTR) sits on billion dollar cushion

Bitcoin’s slide below $80,000 has pushed a significant portion of US spot BTC exchange-traded fund (ETF) buyers into $7 billion in paper losses.

According to CryptoSlate's data, the world’s largest digital asset fell to as low as $74,609 over the weekend amid liquidity concerns and a risk-off tone in global markets. BTC has recovered to approximately $77,649 as of press time.

Alex Thorn, Galaxy Digital’s head of research, noted that this price performance indicates that Bitcoin is trading below the average cost basis of US ETFs. Notably, spot Bitcoin ETF investors are holding average paper losses of approximately 15%, implying an average entry price of approximately $90,200 per Bitcoin.

Bitcoin ETFs Cost BasisBitcoin ETFs Cost Basis (Source: Galaxy Research)
Related Reading

Global markets crash as everything including Bitcoin sells off at once erasing trillions

Over $800 million in long positions were wiped out in minutes as the US open turned into a brutal liquidity bloodbath for unsuspecting traders.

Jan 29, 2026 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

That setup can change behavior. Unlike self-custody buyers, who often tolerate sharp swings, ETF holders include advisers and allocators who rebalance according to predefined portfolio rules. When the average holder is down, rallies can run into “sell-to-even” selling.

When prices fall again, some investors reduce exposure to mitigate risk, especially if volatility rises and Bitcoin continues to move in step with equities.

Considering this, some industry experts argued that the significant drawdown raises the stakes about whether the current redemption streak from the 12 ETF products will evolve from a tactical pause into a sustained market headwind.

Who’s underwater, and by how much?

The extent of the damage is becoming clearer through on-chain and fund-flow analyses.

Jim Bianco of Bianco Research highlighted that the 12 spot Bitcoin ETFs now hold approximately 1.29 million Bitcoin, worth over $115 billion. These funds collectively hold roughly 6.5% of all Bitcoin in circulation.

When combined with the corporate treasury of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), the ETF holdings represent 10% of all Bitcoin.

However, their entry points differ drastically. Strategy has been buying Bitcoin since 2020, averaging $76,020 per purchase, leaving it with an unrealized profit of just $1.17 billion, down from over $30 billion last October.

In contrast, the ETF investors arrived later and paid higher prices.

Bianco noted that the 12-spot Bitcoin ETFs have an average purchase price of approximately $90,200, approximately $13,000 (16%) above current prices.

Bitcoin ETFs Average Purchase Price Bitcoin ETFs Average Purchase Price (Source: Jim Bianco)

Combined, the average purchase price of the ETFs is $85,360, indicating an average loss of approximately $8,000. This represents an unrealized loss of approximately $7 billion for these investors.

Essentially, that places the average Bitcoin ETF buyer underwater.

James Check of Checkonchain added another layer of nuance, stating that if one assumes a cost basis of inflows on the day they occurred, 62% of ETF inflows are now underwater.

Bitcoin ETFs Weekly Flows in Profit and LossBitcoin ETFs Weekly Flows in Profit and Loss (Source: CheckOnChain)

US Bitcoin ETFs are bleeding funds

Meanwhile, the Bitcoin ETF holders' losses have arrived alongside a pronounced shift in capital flows.

Across the 12 spot Bitcoin ETFs, net outflows have totaled roughly $6.18 billion from November 2025 through January 2026. This is the longest monthly outflow streak since these products launched in 2024.

Related Reading

How Bitcoin ETFs lost a whole year of inflows – now down $48B since October

Assets have crashed back to 2024 levels, wiping out a year of growth despite massive buy-side pressure.

Dec 5, 2025 · Liam 'Akiba' Wright

Notably, the redemptions have been punctuated by large daily drawdowns.

For context, SoSo Value data show that the products recorded net redemptions totaling more than $1.3 billion in the last two trading days of January, alongside a 9-day outflow streak, punctuated by a modest inflow of $6.3 million.

When outflows occur in bursts, the market has less time to absorb the supply, which can exacerbate intraday volatility. In episodes like this, Bitcoin often trades like a high-beta macro asset.

Essentially, the outflows represent a reversal of fortunes for BTC ETFs, which had previously been a consistent source of demand for the leading cryptocurrency.

How much Bitcoin the market must swallow

The forward question for the market is basic supply-and-demand math: what happens to Bitcoin’s price discovery if the outflow trend persists?

If the ETF complex continues to shed more than $6 billion every three months, the implied monthly pace is approximately $2 billion in net outflows.

At a hypothetical $75,000 Bitcoin price, this corresponds to roughly 27,000-28,000 BTC per month that other buyers must absorb.

If prices fall, the same dollar outflow corresponds to more BTC, thereby increasing the amount that must be absorbed elsewhere.

That figure looks even larger when compared with Bitcoin’s post-halving issuance schedule. The 2024 halving reduced the block reward to 3.125 BTC, leaving the average new supply at approximately 450 BTC per day, or roughly 13,500 BTC per month.

Sustained ETF redemptions at the recent pace would therefore amount to a supply equivalent to about two months of new issuance every single month.

Unless other demand sources re-emerge, this imbalance can weigh on sentiment and further depress the BTC price.

Why selling can feed more selling

The relationship between ETF flows and price action is statistically significant, and the buyer mix helps explain this relationship.

A report from K33 Research last year found that Bitcoin’s price remains closely tied to ETF flows, with an R-squared of 0.80, accounting for approximately 80% of the variance in 30-day BTC returns.

Bianco pointed to the average trade size as a reality check on who is actually driving activity in these funds. While the average trade for the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is $111,300 and the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is $87,000, the average trade for Bitcoin ETFs is just $15,800.

According to him, that profile appears more like brokerage retail than long-duration institutional positioning.

Average Trade Size of a Bitcoin ETF HolderAverage Trade Size of a Bitcoin ETF Holder (Source: Bianco Research)

If the marginal ETF holder, like Bianco pointed out, is more retail-like, flows can become more “price-driven.”

In plain terms: when prices fall, more investors may decide to get out, and those exits show up as redemptions. Redemptions then force sponsors to sell spot Bitcoin to meet cash withdrawals, which can push the price down again.

Considering this, CryptoSlate's analysis suggests the mid-$75,000s could provide support if buyers step in.

If the Bitcoin price holds those areas and flows stabilize, ETFs could revert from being a source of supply to a marginal buyer again. This would reduce the mechanical supply overhang and potentially dampen market volatility.

However, if outflows persist, BTC could face significant headwinds that could further depress its price. Alphractal CEO Joao Wedson noted that the next major support level for BTC is approximately $65,500 in such scenarios.

The post Bitcoin triggers $7B loss for ETF holders as price could drop to $65,000 while Strategy (MSTR) sits on billion dollar cushion appeared first on CryptoSlate.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Price Shows Best Risk/Reward Ratio, According to Scott Melker

XRP Price Shows Best Risk/Reward Ratio, According to Scott Melker

TLDR Scott Melker believes XRP offers the best risk/reward ratio among all assets. XRP’s price is currently at a critical support zone between $1.55 and $1.60.
Share
Coincentral2026/02/03 03:23
Justin Bieber’s First No. 1 Single Turns 10

Justin Bieber’s First No. 1 Single Turns 10

The post Justin Bieber’s First No. 1 Single Turns 10 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Justin Bieber earned his first No. 1 on the Hot 100 in 2015 with “What Do You Mean?,” a song that marked his transition into mature pop sounds. NEW YORK, NY – MAY 04: Singer Justin Bieber attends the ‘China: Through The Looking Glass’ Costume Institute Benefit Gala at the Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 4, 2015 in New York City. (Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images) Getty Images Justin Bieber’s music career was essentially nonexistent for several years, and fans were beginning to wonder when they’d get to hear from the pop star again — until, out of nowhere, he revealed his new album Swag would drop in just a few hours. The full-length, which blended pop and R&B, arrived shortly thereafter in mid-July, and it brought him back to the highest reaches of several Billboard charts this summer. More recently, Bieber delivered a second installment, titled, appropriately, Swag II, which is counted together with Swag for charting purposes in the United States As he celebrates songs from Swag II and the continued success of multiple tracks from the first edition, his first leader on the Hot 100 turns 10. “What Do You Mean?” Debuted at No. 1 “What Do You Mean?” debuted at No. 1 a decade ago, opening atop the Hot 100 on the chart dated September 19, 2015. The cut was not only Bieber’s first to start in first place, but — amazingly — his first ruler on the most competitive songs ranking in America. Justin Bieber Was a Superstar Without a No. 1 By the time “What Do You Mean?” arrived, Bieber was already one of the biggest pop stars on the planet. He’d racked up multiple hits in America, but he had never managed to lead the Hot 100. The Canadian musician had come…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 23:07
This Forgotten Litecoin (LTC) Price Zone Could Be the Catalyst for a $100 Move

This Forgotten Litecoin (LTC) Price Zone Could Be the Catalyst for a $100 Move

At a glance, the weekly chart shared by Erick Crypto tells a pretty straightforward story. The LTC price is still hanging out in the same support zone it’s been
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/03 03:30