Uber and Bolt drivers in Abuja, under the Amalgamated Union of App-based Transporters of Nigeria (AUATON), have threatened… The post 1500 Uber, Bolt, inDrive driversUber and Bolt drivers in Abuja, under the Amalgamated Union of App-based Transporters of Nigeria (AUATON), have threatened… The post 1500 Uber, Bolt, inDrive drivers

1500 Uber, Bolt, inDrive drivers plan 3-day strike in Abuja over unfair treatment

Uber and Bolt drivers in Abuja, under the Amalgamated Union of App-based Transporters of Nigeria (AUATON), have threatened to embark on a three-day strike to protest what they allege is the insensitivity of the apps.

This was disclosed to Technext by Evans Agada, the Vice Chairman of the FCT Council of the union.

According to Mr Agada, who also chairs the strike planning committee, the planned action will take place between February 9 and February 11. It is meant to address the unfair treatment and poor remuneration by app-based companies such as Uber, Bolt, and inDrive.

Stating that the strike has become inevitable and long overdue, Mr Agada noted that for years, drivers have endured unfair low fares, excessive commission charges, rising fuel prices, vehicle maintenance costs, and total neglect of driver welfare.

Uber, Bolt, inDrive: 1500 Abuja drivers threaten 3 days strikeEvans Agada

He noted that despite all attempts to settle amicably with the app companies following repeated complaints and engagements, they refused all entreaties.

We own our vehicles, we maintain them, we fuel them, yet we are treated as disposable tools. Enough is enough,” the vice chairman said.

He also warned that the strike will be total. Over 1,500 drivers have agreed to shut down services within 24 hours of the decision. And, the number of drivers is growing. He explained that the overwhelming pledge of participation indicates how widespread the problem is.

When people are pushed to the wall, unity becomes their strength,” he said.

Read also: e-Hailing drivers kick as Bolt introduces cheaper ‘Wait and Save’ ride category

Uber/Bolt/driver partnership is one-sided

The vice chairman, Evans Agada, also raised concerns about the nature of the partnership between app companies, such as Uber and Bolt, on one hand, and drivers on the other. He argued that the partnership is clearly one-sided in favour of the companies while disadvantageous to the drivers.

You cannot call someone a partner and treat them like a slave. A true partnership comes with fair earnings, transparency, respect, and protection. What we experience is one-sided control, where companies determine fares, commissions, penalties, and even account deactivation without fair hearing,” he said.

Bolt, Uber, inDrive: Ranking Nigeria's e-hailing platforms for availability, pricing and safetyinDrive, Uber and Bolt logos merged into one

In light of this, the chairman said drivers are demanding an increase in base fares for trips to reflect current economic realities. They are also demanding a reduction of excessive commission charges as well as transparent fare calculations.

Finally, they are demanding welfare and insurance protection and an end to unfair and arbitrary deactivations.

We are not asking for luxury; we are asking for fairness and dignity,” he said.

The vice chairman further apologised to the public for any inconvenience, noting that the struggle is also in the public interest.

A frustrated, exploited driver cannot deliver safe or quality service. When drivers are treated fairly, passengers benefit from better, safer transportation,” he said.

He also assured that the union has duly informed relevant security agencies and stakeholders about the intended strike, including the State Services (DSS), as well as the National Human Rights Commission. He also assured that the movement is peaceful, lawful, and aimed at protecting livelihoods, not disrupting society.

Finally, he called on the app companies to dialogue with the drivers and respect the union or face actions such as this.

“Drivers are the backbone of your business. Without drivers, there is no platform. We are open to dialogue, but we are no longer willing to suffer in silence,” he said.

The post 1500 Uber, Bolt, inDrive drivers plan 3-day strike in Abuja over unfair treatment first appeared on Technext.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Telos Advisers Welcomes Stephen Gardner as a Strategic Advisory Board Member

Telos Advisers Welcomes Stephen Gardner as a Strategic Advisory Board Member

Former Amtrak CEO brings more than 25 years of leadership experience in rail, infrastructure delivery, and national transportation policy NEWARK, N.J.–(BUSINESS
Share
AI Journal2026/02/03 02:16
ONDO Price Crashes 88% From All-Time Highs, But Analyst Says ‘Last Hope’ Zone Is Here

ONDO Price Crashes 88% From All-Time Highs, But Analyst Says ‘Last Hope’ Zone Is Here

The ONDO price has drifted into a part of the chart that usually gets traders paying attention. After months of downside, the price is now sitting inside a zone
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/03 02:30