“What divides us here isn’t some fundamental disagreement on both sides,” US Senator Cory Booker said Thursday of crypto market structure legislation. Credit: Shutterstock“What divides us here isn’t some fundamental disagreement on both sides,” US Senator Cory Booker said Thursday of crypto market structure legislation. Credit: Shutterstock

Crypto bill advances in Senate committee despite Democrats’ Trump, DeFi concerns

2026/01/30 05:31
4 min read

US Senators in the Agriculture Committee advanced crypto market structure legislation along party lines on Thursday.

Republicans voted to advance the bill, which details rules for the trading of so-called digital commodities and includes protections for developers of decentralised financial protocols.

“In order to protect American consumers, onshore innovation, and allow US businesses to continue to grow and prosper, we must grant the CFTC regulatory authority over the spot market trading of digital commodities,” Committee Chair John Boozman, a Republican from Arkansas, said ahead of the vote.

“Advancing this bill is the first step, and there are many steps to come in achieving those goals.”

Familiar fault lines emerged during the vote, with Democrats saying they couldn’t support a bill that allowed President Donald Trump to enrich himself with crypto as he pushes for a bill that has the potential to bring the asset class into the mainstream.

Democrats also said they wouldn’t support a bill that failed to guarantee Democratic representation on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, one of two key financial regulators in the US.

The body is currently led single-handedly by Trump appointee Michael Selig. Historically, the CFTC and other regulatory commissions have had a mix of both Democrats and Republicans.

One senator even suggested decentralised finance remains a sticking point.

“We keep talking about this thing called DeFi. Go and have a town hall and talk to your constituents about DeFi and see how many of them are going to be able to talk about it with clarity,” Senator Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico, said.

“There are loopholes that terrorists and cartels are using today that the United States knows about,” he later said, adding that the details weren’t widely known because such reports had been classified.

The road ahead

Even as Republicans advanced the bill, its wider prospects remain in doubt. A companion bill in the Senate Banking Committee, which details which digital assets should fall under the purview of the Securities and Exchange Commission, was scheduled for a similar vote earlier this month.

But that vote was cancelled at the last minute after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said he could not support the bill, citing its ban on stablecoin yield and its stringent anti-money laundering provisions, among other things.

Both bills will have to be combined before they can go to the full senate for a vote. And Senate rules mean any bill will need to secure bipartisan support.

Should a combined bill earn the chamber’s support, it will have to be reconciled with a version that passed the House of Representatives last summer.

Those obstacles will be difficult to scale in an election year.

The Trump conundrum

The Trump family’s foray into crypto remains a key issue for Senate Democrats.

“The White House has made this infinitely harder,” New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, the bill’s lead Democrat negotiator, said on Thursday.

“I have had private conversations with republican colleagues and staffers that agree with me. … The fact that Donald Trump is grifting on crypto himself, it’s like me creating a Cory coin,” he added, calling it “ridiculous.”

Other Senators complained about the lack of Democrats on the CFTC.

“We can’t give the CFTC this broad new authority when it only has one Republican member,” Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said.

Republicans rejected a series of proposed Democrat amendments, including ones that would limit federal officials’ ability to profit off crypto and that would bar crypto companies from receiving taxpayer-funded bailouts.

Boozman said the amendments were either beyond the scope of the bill or best handled by the Senate Banking committee.

Still, Booker said he was hopeful a crypto market structure bill could earn bipartisan support.

“What divides us here isn’t some fundamental disagreement on both sides,” he said. “We’ve got this short distance with a clear path forward.”

Aleks Gilbert is DL News’ New York-based DeFi correspondent. You can reach him at [email protected].

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt

De Britse financiële waakhond, de FCA, komt in 2026 met nieuwe regels speciaal voor crypto bedrijven. Wat direct opvalt: de toezichthouder laat enkele klassieke financiële verplichtingen los om beter aan te sluiten op de snelle en grillige wereld van digitale activa. Tegelijkertijd wordt er extra nadruk gelegd op digitale beveiliging,... Het bericht FCA komt in 2026 met aangepaste cryptoregels voor Britse markt verscheen het eerst op Blockchain Stories.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:33
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

Trump foe devises plan to starve him of what he 'craves' most

A longtime adversary of President Donald Trump has a plan for a key group to take away what Trump craves the most — attention. EX-CNN journalist Jim Acosta, who
Share
Rawstory2026/02/04 01:19