The post Unsealed Epstein Files Reference Michael Saylor and Adam Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor mentioned in a 2010 charity email, predatingThe post Unsealed Epstein Files Reference Michael Saylor and Adam Back appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor mentioned in a 2010 charity email, predating

Unsealed Epstein Files Reference Michael Saylor and Adam Back

3 min read
  • Michael Saylor mentioned in a 2010 charity email, predating his Bitcoin advocacy by a decade.
  • Blockstream’s 2014 seed fundraising involved Epstein-linked intermediaries, later divested.
  • Epstein showed curiosity in early crypto, discussing Bitcoin with Thiel, not acting on it.

Newly unsealed records from the U.S. Department of Justice have reignited scrutiny around social and investment networks tied to the late Jeffrey Epstein. The documents, released on January 31, compile emails, travel notes, and correspondence spanning years. Consequently, public attention has focused on names appearing in unrelated contexts. 

Importantly, the DOJ stressed that inclusion alone does not imply wrongdoing. Hence, the records provide context rather than conclusions. Moreover, the files capture moments before major crypto milestones reshaped the technology sector.

Charity Correspondence Mentions Michael Saylor Before the Bitcoin Era

One email predating the crypto boom references Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy. Dated May 8, 2010, the message came from publicist Peggy Siegal and discussed arrangements around the Robin Hood Foundation gala and Cannes-related events. Additionally, it described a $25,000 donation that enabled access to invitations and introductions within elite social settings.

However, the correspondence framed the donation as transactional access rather than influence. Moreover, the description focused on social impressions rather than business dealings. 

Significantly, the email predates Saylor’s later role as a corporate Bitcoin advocate by a decade. Consequently, it contains no references to cryptocurrency or related ventures. Saylor began acquiring Bitcoin for MicroStrategy in 2020, years after the event.

Blockstream Emails Reflect Early Crypto Fundraising Context

Separate records highlight 2014 communications tied to Blockstream during its seed fundraising. An email exchange involved co-founder Austin Hill discussing an oversubscribed round with intermediaries connected to Epstein and academic circles. Additionally, the thread included Adam Back, who later addressed the disclosures publicly.

Back explained that Blockstream met Epstein through a fund associated with Joi Ito. Moreover, the fund later held a minority stake before divesting due to concerns. 

Consequently, Back emphasized the absence of any ongoing relationship. Besides, the documents include travel references that reflect the era’s networking practices rather than operational ties.

Broader Crypto Curiosity Appears in Epstein Records

The files also reveal Epstein’s curiosity about early crypto debates. Additionally, correspondence shows discussions with Peter Thiel about Bitcoin’s role as a value storage system, currency, or architecture. 

Moreover, later notes suggest ideas around region-specific digital currencies. However, these exchanges reflect observation and opinion, not execution. Hence, the records sketch a period of experimentation and social overlap without alleging misconduct.

Related: Jeffrey Epstein’s Archives Reveal Plots Against XRP and XLM in 2014

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/unsealed-epstein-files-reference-michael-saylor-and-adam-back/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.