President Donald Trump's administration insisted that there would be "national security implications" if the new White House ballroom was not built immediately.President Donald Trump's administration insisted that there would be "national security implications" if the new White House ballroom was not built immediately.

Trump ballroom lawyers say project essential for 'national security'

2 min read

President Donald Trump's administration insisted that there would be "national security implications" if the new White House ballroom was not built immediately.

In a motion opposing an injunction to halt the building of a massive White House addition, attorneys for the National Park Service warned there could be "an emergency situation" if the project were paused.

"Defendants have strong arguments for appeal, and the equities and public interest weigh overwhelmingly against suspending construction in the interim," the motion stated.

Defendants' attorneys warned that stopping ballroom construction would "leave an unsightly excavation site in President's Park indefinitely."

They also said that "halting construction would imperil the President and others who live and work in the White House."

According to the defendants' attorneys, the ongoing construction was "a hazard and complicates Secret Service operations."

"While Plaintiff has suggested that the Court could allow construction that is necessary for national security to continue, it is unworkable to distinguish between construction elements that are national security-related and those that are not," the attorneys claimed.

"This Court should stay any preliminary injunction pending appeal," the motion concluded. "The D.C. Circuit should have the opportunity to weigh in on these significant and novel issues of first impression before the President is ordered to stop work in the middle of a high-priority construction project that implicates national security, particularly at the behest of a third party with no legally cognizable interest in the White House grounds and no applicable cause of action to intrude into this novel matter of inter-branch relations."

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

You May Also Like

What Would Happen If Amazon Were To Incorporate XRP Into Its Services?

What Would Happen If Amazon Were To Incorporate XRP Into Its Services?

Rumors of an alliance between XRP and multinational tech giant Amazon are circulating across the market once again. A crypto market expert has shared what could
Share
Bitcoinist2026/02/04 00:00
UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21
Xgram Launches Private USDT ERC20 to XMR Swaps

Xgram Launches Private USDT ERC20 to XMR Swaps

San Jose, Costa Rica  Xgram.io, a leading non-custodial multichain cryptocurrency exchange platform, today announced the availability of private swaps for the USDT
Share
AI Journal2026/02/04 00:04