SEC v. Ripple Dispute Should Never Have Happened, Says Legal Expert

TLDR

• James Murphy, a veteran securities lawyer, claims the SEC v. Ripple case was unjustified from the start.
• Murphy argues that most legal experts in crypto never believed XRP was a security.
• The SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple accused the company of conducting an unregistered sale of XRP tokens.
• The case has become a proxy battle for the entire altcoin market, with significant attention from crypto experts.
• Jason Calacanis, a tech investor, reignited the debate by calling XRP a “centrally controlled security.”

The ongoing legal battle between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Ripple over the status of XRP has resurfaced. James Murphy, a well-known securities lawyer, recently claimed that the SEC’s case against Ripple was unfounded. He argues that XRP was never a security and that legal experts in the crypto space never believed otherwise.

SEC v. Ripple: Legal Expert’s Stance

James Murphy, also known as MetaLawMan, expressed his doubts about the SEC’s case. He believes the SEC’s pursuit of Ripple was misguided from the start. “Most legal professionals with crypto expertise never believed XRP was a security,” Murphy stated. His comments have stirred the XRP community, already frustrated by years of legal turmoil.

The lawsuit, filed just before former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton stepped down, accused Ripple of conducting an unregistered sale of XRP. It sparked an ongoing dispute that has drawn attention across the entire cryptocurrency market. Murphy has criticized the case as unjustified, claiming it was a proxy war for the broader altcoin market.

XRP’s Legal Troubles: SEC’s Actions Under Scrutiny

The legal conflict started when the SEC accused Ripple of selling XRP tokens as unregistered securities. The SEC’s move was seen by many as an overreach, with Ripple asserting that XRP is not a security but rather a digital asset. Murphy’s recent remarks bring this longstanding dispute back into the spotlight, challenging the SEC’s stance.

Jason Calacanis, a tech investor, reignited the debate with a controversial statement. He described XRP as a “centrally controlled security” and warned that the SEC’s leniency could lead to market chaos. His remarks stirred further unrest, especially among XRP supporters who felt the SEC’s action was unnecessary.

The post SEC v. Ripple Dispute Should Never Have Happened, Says Legal Expert appeared first on CoinCentral.