Crypto enthusiast Mason Versluis published a post and accompanying video explaining why references to XRP and Ripple in recently circulated Epstein-related emails have not altered his position on XRP. The tweet opened with a clear declaration: he is not selling because of those mentions.
In the attached video, Versluis stated at the outset that any mention of XRP or Ripple in the Epstein emails should not be conflated with the criminal acts associated with Epstein or individuals around him.
He emphasized that the material he was addressing was strictly related to business and the evolution of the financial system, not the crimes described in those documents. According to Versluis, blending these topics leads to confusion and emotionally driven reactions that do not reflect a careful assessment of the facts.
Versluis explained that, in his view, the references should be interpreted through the lens of industry competition during the early development of blockchain technology. He pointed to the period around 2014, arguing that Ripple’s technology was already gaining attention and momentum at that time. He suggested that this progress made certain segments of the Bitcoin community uneasy, particularly as alternative infrastructures were being built and promoted.
Within this context, Versluis mentioned Blockstream, characterizing its development as part of a broader competitive response within the blockchain ecosystem. His argument centered on the idea that corporate relationships, communications, and mentions in emails are often tied to business strategy and technological positioning, rather than endorsements or moral associations. From his perspective, this distinction is essential for evaluating information calmly and accurately.
A significant portion of Versluis’s message addressed repeated questions from followers asking whether the Epstein email references had changed his investment stance. He responded directly that they had not. He urged viewers to apply critical thinking and avoid reacting to headlines or emotionally charged narratives.
Versluis stressed that investment decisions should be grounded in an analysis of technology, market structure, and long-term utility rather than external controversies unrelated to a project’s function.
He further stated that he intentionally separates criminal matters from his analysis of digital assets, noting that discussions about the crimes referenced in the emails are for others to handle. His focus, he said, remains on the cryptocurrency-related elements and their implications for the financial system.
Versluis concluded by reaffirming that he is still holding XRP and does not view the situation as a reason to sell. He cited past examples in which political figures or unrelated associations did not influence his positions in other digital assets, arguing that consistency and discipline are critical. His closing remarks encouraged investors to avoid linking emotions to market decisions and to evaluate information with restraint and reasoned judgment.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
The post Top Trader Says He’s No Longer Selling XRP. Here’s why appeared first on Times Tabloid.


