QUARRY. The quarry site in Angono, Rizal, as of August 2025.QUARRY. The quarry site in Angono, Rizal, as of August 2025.

[Kasalikasan] What do traffic and garbage have in common? Band-aid solutions

2026/02/04 18:00
3 min read

Hello!

January always feels like the longest month of the year because it’s the first month back from the holidays. But you know what feels longer? Being stuck in traffic, wasting minutes, sometimes hours, when you could be doing more productive things with your time.

If you live or work in Metro Manila, where were you last December 9? I was fortunate enough to have the option to work from home that day, but many workers did not have that luxury: According to the latest TomTom Traffic Index, that was the worst day to travel in Metro Manila in 2025, with the congestion level reaching a whopping 88% — and that wasn’t even peak Christmas season yet!

The same index also pointed out that a 10-kilometer drive in the metro in 2025 took 31 seconds longer than the 2024 average. 

What does that say about the efforts to solve Metro Manila’s perennial traffic problem when it’s taking longer, not shorter, for us to go from point A to point B?

Along EDSA alone, too many “solutions” have been touted in the last year, and they were often attempts to take away the bus carousel lane that has served millions instead of dealing with the congestion caused by more and more cars plying through roads that are not suitable for heavy traffic. 

The latest suggestion? Make the bus lane a carpool lane, too, but for vehicles with 10 or more people. My fellow editors and I wondered how that would even work: Would people start buying vans now? And won’t this only delay not just buses but also ambulances that use the lane during emergencies? So many questions about another band-aid solution (which the transportation department has rightfully shut down). Maybe let’s leave the bus lane alone and channel our energy into improving our public transportation and decongesting our roads, yes?

What else happened in January? Early last month, Manila City came out with a statement defending its controversial ordinance on garbage collection fees as “lawful and constitutionally sound,” probably after businesses groaned from the astronomical increase in fees that had not been updated since 2013. Rappler reporter Patrick Cruz wrote that some businesses decried the lack of public consultation, but the city’s vice mayor said the hike didn’t require one — never mind if the increase is as much as 1,200%.

Would it really hurt to consult businesses that provide employment and bring revenue to the capital city? And with the country’s solid waste management still “far from ideal,” maybe it’s time to take a long, hard look at this focus on collection without addressing the other components in managing waste. If only we could implement our solid waste management laws better, maybe we wouldn’t have to amend them to explore more band-aid solutions.

We deserve better.

Till the Tuesday after next!

Here are other stories from our cluster that you shouldn’t miss:


How many hours has traffic stolen from Filipinos?

Relocate wind turbines, Antipolo mayor urges DENR, energy firm

Dupax Mining Protest in Makati

Dupax del Norte anti-mining barricade continues despite dispersal, arrests

Outdoors, Landslide, Nature

Illegal quarry operators in Rizal arrested


Kasalikasan is a bimonthly newsletter featuring environmental and science issues, delivered straight to your inbox every other Tuesday. Visit rappler.com/newsletters to subscribe.

Market Opportunity
Common Protocol Logo
Common Protocol Price(COMMON)
$0.0004835
$0.0004835$0.0004835
-32.54%
USD
Common Protocol (COMMON) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.