A GROWING WAVE of fake news and disinformation is sweeping over the Philippines. According to the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025, 67% of Filipinos areA GROWING WAVE of fake news and disinformation is sweeping over the Philippines. According to the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025, 67% of Filipinos are

The rise of disinformation attacks in the Philippines

4 min read

By Ram Vaidyanathan

A GROWING WAVE of fake news and disinformation is sweeping over the Philippines. According to the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025, 67% of Filipinos are concerned about misinformation and disinformation in online news. Not only is that figure the highest for the country since it was first included in the report in 2020, but it is also higher than this year’s global average (58%). This comes amid the increasing use of advanced technology like deepfakes enabled by AI to spread misinformation and disinformation.

To fight back against threat actors and uphold public trust, organizations and the wider society must know how to protect themselves. That rests on understanding, anticipating, and combating disinformation with strategic precision.

PREYING ON HUMAN PERCEPTION
Malicious actors have numerous reasons for spreading misinformation or disinformation. Some may want to cause polarization. Highly targeted attacks aim to divide customers, employees, and investors with controversy to weaken trust and hinder collective response. Others may use misinformation campaigns as a social engineering vector, posing as reputable companies to disseminate false or deceptive messages that trick people into falling for phishing schemes and scam platforms that collect consumer information. In severe cases, coordinated campaigns undermine institutional credibility to manipulate market sentiment or stock prices.

Ultimately, these campaigns differ from cyberattacks on IT infrastructure by targeting human perception, forcing organizations into a game of whack-a-mole where they have to repeatedly respond to false claims. The cumulative cost of this can be a major drain on resources and morale because every hour an executive spends managing a public relations crisis is an hour not spent on strategic growth.

THE DISINFORMATION PLAYBOOK
To achieve their goals, malicious actors employ common methods of disinformation such as AI-generated deepfakes, which seem authentic and are increasingly harder to verify with the naked eye. These advanced threats have drawn the attention of regulators. According to House Bill No. 3214, people or platforms that knowingly create, share, or refuse to remove deepfake content after proper notice from authorities or relevant platforms may face two to five years of imprisonment and a P50,000-200,000 fine.

With a wealth of disinformation tactics available to threat actors, organizations have their work cut out for them. Here, the best defense is a holistic strategy that can reduce risks, enhance transparency, and boost consumer and stakeholder confidence in enterprise security and credibility.

DISINFORMATION DEFENSE: A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Offering unique business partnerships is not enough to remain competitive with enterprises from around the world; local players must diligently and proactively combat disinformation. That means taking disinformation security as seriously as global peers. According to Gartner, 50% of enterprises will implement solutions to combat disinformation by 2028. This is more than 10 times the percentage in 2024.

This dramatic shift highlights a growing awareness among executives that disinformation is more than just an occasional nuisance. It is a persistent threat that can result in significant financial damage. Philippine businesses must also come to terms with this reality and ensure that they have robust protections against disinformation.

DEFENDING TRUTH WITH SMARTER TOOLS AND TEAMS
False narratives powered by increasingly affordable AI tools put organizations on the back foot if they fail to leverage the same advanced technologies. Specialized solutions ensure they have effective, organization-wide disinformation security. These include tools that integrate disinformation response into an organization’s wider cybersecurity strategy and business continuity plans. Organizations must look to AI-powered detection and monitoring solutions, which enable the evaluation and verification of the authenticity of content by analyzing digital fingerprints and detecting AI-generated elements that are undetectable to the human eye.

However, not all AI-powered tools are created equal. It is therefore critical that AI-powered tools are equipped to cross-reference claims against verified databases and to highlight suspicious activity. A system that monitors shifts across media outlets and social media in real time can alert security teams to emerging false narratives before they gain too much traction.

Of course, tools without well-trained human operators are practically useless. Organizations must therefore invest in employee training and crisis communication to help employees quickly identify false narratives and coordinate responses. Additionally, organizations would benefit most from collaborating with regulators, fact-checkers, and industry peers on defense in order to effectively secure the Philippines’ digital economy.

Disinformation can be a powerful disruptor to the Philippines’ economic ambitions. It’s not just a public relations issue; disinformation is a core business risk and should be treated as such. Leaders must act now before false narratives take root.

Ram Vaidyanathan is the chief IT security evangelist, ManageEngine.

Market Opportunity
RISE Logo
RISE Price(RISE)
$0.003885
$0.003885$0.003885
0.00%
USD
RISE (RISE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UBS CEO Targets Direct Crypto Access With “Fast Follower” Tokenization Strategy

UBS CEO Targets Direct Crypto Access With “Fast Follower” Tokenization Strategy

The tension in UBS’s latest strategy update is not between profit and innovation, but between speed and control. On February 4, 2026, as the bank reported a record
Share
Ethnews2026/02/05 04:56
When Will Altcoin Season Start? FED Rate Cut Fuels Bitcoin, but Ethereum Still Lagging

When Will Altcoin Season Start? FED Rate Cut Fuels Bitcoin, but Ethereum Still Lagging

The post When Will Altcoin Season Start? FED Rate Cut Fuels Bitcoin, but Ethereum Still Lagging appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The crypto market edged higher today after the U.S. Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point rate cut, fueling optimism across risk assets. Bitcoin price today is trading around $117,000, while Ethereum holds steady near $4,600. The broader crypto market cap rose modestly, with major altcoins mixed but stable. Analysts note the short-term tone is …
Share
CoinPedia2025/09/18 14:59
Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision

The post Cryptos Signal Divergence Ahead of Fed Rate Decision appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto assets send conflicting signals ahead of the Federal Reserve’s September rate decision. On-chain data reveals a clear decrease in Bitcoin and Ethereum flowing into centralized exchanges, but a sharp increase in altcoin inflows. The findings come from a Tuesday report by CryptoQuant, an on-chain data platform. The firm’s data shows a stark divergence in coin volume, which has been observed in movements onto centralized exchanges over the past few weeks. Bitcoin and Ethereum Inflows Drop to Multi-Month Lows Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin has seen a dramatic drop in exchange inflows, with the 7-day moving average plummeting to 25,000 BTC, its lowest level in over a year. The average deposit per transaction has fallen to 0.57 BTC as of September. This suggests that smaller retail investors, rather than large-scale whales, are responsible for the recent cash-outs. Ethereum is showing a similar trend, with its daily exchange inflows decreasing to a two-month low. CryptoQuant reported that the 7-day moving average for ETH deposits on exchanges is around 783,000 ETH, the lowest in two months. Other Altcoins See Renewed Selling Pressure In contrast, other altcoin deposit activity on exchanges has surged. The number of altcoin deposit transactions on centralized exchanges was quite steady in May and June of this year, maintaining a 7-day moving average of about 20,000 to 30,000. Recently, however, that figure has jumped to 55,000 transactions. Altcoins: Exchange Inflow Transaction Count. Source: CryptoQuant CryptoQuant projects that altcoins, given their increased inflow activity, could face relatively higher selling pressure compared to BTC and ETH. Meanwhile, the balance of stablecoins on exchanges—a key indicator of potential buying pressure—has increased significantly. The report notes that the exchange USDT balance, around $273 million in April, grew to $379 million by August 31, marking a new yearly high. CryptoQuant interprets this surge as a reflection of…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:01