Key takeaways U.S. House lawmakers launched an investigation into WLFI over a reported $500 million UAE-linked investment The probe was […] The post Congress TargetsKey takeaways U.S. House lawmakers launched an investigation into WLFI over a reported $500 million UAE-linked investment The probe was […] The post Congress Targets

Congress Targets WLFI in New Probe Over UAE-Linked Investment Claims

2026/02/05 18:15
3 min read

Key takeaways

  • U.S. House lawmakers launched an investigation into WLFI over a reported $500 million UAE-linked investment
  • The probe was triggered by a Wall Street Journal report detailing foreign ownership concerns
  • Lawmakers are examining potential national security, legal, and policy implications
  • The case adds to broader scrutiny of crypto firms with cross-border ties

Congress raises national security and policy concerns

The investigation is being led by the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, with Ranking Member Ro Khanna formally requesting information from WLFI co-founder Zach Witkoff. In a letter dated February 4, lawmakers cited concerns that the reported transaction involved entities connected to the United Arab Emirates royal family and may have broader implications for U.S. policy and security.

According to the letter, the Wall Street Journal reported that intermediaries linked to Abu Dhabi’s royal family secured a significant stake in WLFI shortly before President Donald Trump’s inauguration. Lawmakers argue that under normal circumstances, such a level of foreign investment into a company tied to the president’s family would have triggered intense scrutiny, raising questions about transparency, influence, and compliance with U.S. law.

READ MORE:

Italian Police Probe Dogecoin-Linked Football Club for Money Laundering

The letter also references additional allegations involving WLFI’s activities, including the reported use of its USD-pegged stablecoin to facilitate a multi-billion-dollar investment into Binance by Emirati entities. Lawmakers claim these arrangements may intersect with U.S. export controls, sanctions policy, and efforts to prevent advanced technology from reaching China through third-party countries.

Taken together, members of Congress say the reported relationships warrant closer examination to determine whether any U.S. laws were violated and whether foreign financial influence may have affected government policy decisions. The committee has requested documents and detailed disclosures to better understand the links between WLFI, foreign investors, and U.S. political leadership.

The probe underscores intensifying scrutiny of crypto firms operating at the crossroads of geopolitics and finance.

Overall, the investigation adds another layer of uncertainty around WLFI, with lawmakers signaling that foreign capital flows into sensitive crypto and financial ventures will face heightened scrutiny going forward.


The information provided in this article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Coindoo.com does not endorse or recommend any specific investment strategy or cryptocurrency. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

The post Congress Targets WLFI in New Probe Over UAE-Linked Investment Claims appeared first on Coindoo.

Market Opportunity
WLFI Logo
WLFI Price(WLFI)
$0.1176
$0.1176$0.1176
-5.39%
USD
WLFI (WLFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags: