Markets Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail Bitcoin’s crash to $60,000 has traders hunti Markets Share Share this article Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail Bitcoin’s crash to $60,000 has traders hunti

Bitcoin’s crash to $60,000 has traders hunting for a hidden fund blowup

2026/02/06 14:52
4 min read
Share
Share this article
Copy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail

Bitcoin’s crash to $60,000 has traders hunting for a hidden fund blowup

Traders on X are pointing to everything from a Hong Kong fund blowup to yen funding stress and even quantum security fears as bitcoin’s plunge turns into a full-blown narrative vacuum.

By Shaurya Malwa|Edited by Sam Reynolds
Feb 6, 2026, 6:52 a.m.
Make us preferred on Google

What to know:

  • Bitcoin tumbled nearly 30% in a week to around $60,000, sparking speculation that the sell-off was driven by a large, possibly Asia-based non-crypto player facing forced liquidations rather than typical market jitters.
  • Traders and analysts floated theories ranging from a sovereign or exchange dumping billions in bitcoin to a complex unwind of leveraged carry trades and options positions tied to BlackRock’s IBIT spot bitcoin ETF.
  • The crash has also revived concerns about bitcoin’s long-term security, with some industry figures arguing that lower prices may be needed to spur serious action on quantum-resistance as liquidity thins and sentiment sinks to post-FTX lows.

Bitcoin’s plunge to nearly $60,000 on Thursday, a nearly 30% drop over 7 days, has got traders on X began floating theories that the selloff was not purely macro or risk-off, but various reasons that contributed to the asset’s worst single-day performance since FTX crashed in 2022.

Flood, a prominent crypto trader, called it in an X post the most vicious selling he’s seen in years and said it felt “forced” and “indiscriminate,” floating possibilities ranging from a sovereign dumping billions to an exchange balance sheet blowup.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW
Don't miss another story.Subscribe to the Crypto Daybook Americas Newsletter today. See all newsletters
Sign me up

Pantera Capital general partner Franklin Bi offered a more detailed theory. He suggested the seller could be a large Asia-based player with limited crypto-native counterparties, meaning the market would not “sniff them out” quickly.

In his view, the chain of events may have started with leverage on Binance, then worsened as carry trades unwound and liquidity evaporated, with a failed attempt to recover losses in gold and silver accelerating the forced unwind this week.

But the more unusual narrative emerging from the crash is not about leverage. It is about security.

Charles Edwards of Capriole argued that falling prices may finally force serious attention on bitcoin’s quantum security risks.

Edwards said he was “serious” when he warned last year that bitcoin might need to go lower to incentivize meaningful action, calling recent developments the first “promising progress” he has seen so far.

Parker White, COO and CIO at DeFi Development Corp., pointed to unusual activity in BlackRock’s spot bitcoin ETF (IBIT) as a possible culprit behind Thursday’s washout.

He noted IBIT posted its biggest-ever volume day at $10.7 billion, alongside a record $900 million in options premium, arguing the pattern fits a large options-driven liquidation rather than a typical crypto-native leverage unwind.

“I have no hard evidence here, just some hunches and bread crumbs, but it does seem very plausible,” White wrote on X.

Bitcoin’s drop over the past week has been less about a slow grind lower and more about sudden air pockets, with sharp intraday swings replacing the orderly dip-buying seen earlier this year.

The move has dragged BTC back toward levels last traded in late 2024, while liquidity has looked thin across major venues. With altcoins under heavier pressure and sentiment collapsing to post-FTX style readings, traders are now treating each rebound as suspect until flows and positioning visibly reset.

btc crash
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.