Did minting $3 billion USDT, USDC just help stop Bitcoin losing $60k?

The crypto market has entered a fragile phase as Bitcoin dropped under the critical $70,000 level and bounced off $60,000, a zone that has increasingly acted as a gravitational pull rather than a launchpad.

This subdued price action came as the stablecoin market has surged, with Tether and Circle minting billions of dollars’ worth of new tokens in recent days.

At first glance, the expansion of digital dollar supply appears to suggest renewed liquidity entering the ecosystem. However, a closer look at flows indicates a more cautious, structurally constrained market.

Stablecoins function as the primary liquidity rails of the crypto economy, enabling trading, leverage, settlement, and capital mobility without touching the traditional banking system.

As a result, changes in their issuance and movement are often scrutinized for signals about market direction.

In this instance, the divergence between rising issuance and weakening exchange flows highlights a market that is accumulating liquidity defensively rather than deploying it aggressively.

Stablecoin minting accelerates

On Feb. 4, blockchain analysis platform Lookonchain reported that Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC collectively added more than $3 billion in newly minted supply over a three-day period. This came even as Bitcoin and other major tokens failed to sustain any upward momentum.

The rapid increase was further corroborated by Tether, which reported that USDT ended the fourth quarter of 2025 with a market capitalization of $187.3 billion, an increase of $12.4 billion from the prior quarter.

According to the firm, that growth occurred despite a contraction in the broader crypto market, in which digital asset prices fell sharply following the October 2025 sell-off.

Historically, stablecoin issuance has tended to rise during periods of volatility. Traders often rotate into dollar-pegged tokens to preserve value while remaining positioned to re-enter the market quickly.

In some cycles, bursts of issuance have preceded rallies, as fresh liquidity was deployed into spot and derivatives markets. In others, they have coincided with prolonged consolidation, reflecting caution rather than conviction.

The current episode appears closer to the latter. While supply is increasing, the destination and use of that liquidity matter more than the headline numbers.

Exchange flows point to liquidity withdrawal, not deployment

Data from CryptoQuant suggests the crypto market is experiencing a sustained drawdown in risk-facing liquidity.

After expanding by more than $140 billion since 2023, the total stablecoin market capitalization peaked in late 2025 before beginning to decline in December.

More telling than aggregate supply, however, are net flows of stablecoins into and out of exchanges.

During periods of rising risk appetite, stablecoins typically flow to exchanges, where they can be readily converted into BTC or ETH or used as margin for leveraged trades.

Outflows, by contrast, tend to signal capital preservation, as funds are moved off exchanges into self-custody or lower-risk uses.

In October 2025, exchange flows reflected exceptional momentum. Average monthly net inflows of stablecoins exceeded $9.7 billion, with nearly $8.8 billion directed to Binance alone, according to CryptoQuant.

That surge in liquidity coincided with Bitcoin’s rally toward a new all-time high and supported elevated leverage across derivatives markets.

Since November, the pattern has reversed. Those inflows have been largely erased, first through a sharp decline of roughly $9.6 billion, followed by a brief stabilization, and then renewed outflows.

The data shows more than $4 billion in net stablecoin withdrawals from exchanges, including about $3.1 billion from Binance.

This trend points to rising risk aversion and, in some cases, capitulation among later market entrants.

Some of the outflows may also reflect internal exchange adjustments, as platforms reduce support for underutilized stablecoins amid weaker demand.

Even accounting for those factors, the persistence of withdrawals suggests that liquidity is retreating from the venues where price discovery and leverage are most concentrated.

Stablecoin issuance and price decouple as liquidity becomes defensive

The divergence between rising issuance and falling exchange balances reflects a key distinction often lost in market narratives.

Minting stablecoins does not automatically translate into buying power for risk assets. Instead, it represents potential liquidity rather than deployed liquidity.

In the current environment, that potential appears to be held in reserve. Stablecoins are increasingly used as a parking asset during periods of uncertainty, allowing traders to remain within the crypto ecosystem without taking directional exposure.

In derivatives markets, ample stablecoin balances can dampen funding rate volatility and support hedging strategies, but they do not necessarily drive spot demand.

So, Bitcoin's current struggle to break decisively higher despite the expansion of stablecoin supply reflects this dynamic.

The capital exists, but it is being used to manage risk rather than to express it.

This helps explain why BTC fell below $70,000, as it failed to attract sustained follow-through liquidity.

Meanwhile, this pattern also contrasts with other asset classes.

CryptoQuant notes that, although digital assets have faced a persistent liquidity shortfall, capital continues to flow into equities and precious metals, where macroeconomic uncertainty has not deterred risk-taking to the same extent.

Stablecoins cement their role as infrastructure, not a catalyst

Despite the near-term headwinds, the long-term trajectory of stablecoins remains one of structural growth.

The total stablecoin market surpassed $300 billion in 2025, cementing digital dollars as a core layer of crypto market infrastructure.

Tether and Circle continue to dominate issuance and transaction activity, even as competition from newer issuers and tokenized bank deposits intensifies.

Circle has emphasized USDC’s regulatory posture and reserve transparency as it courts institutional users, while Tether’s global footprint has made USDT the dominant settlement asset across offshore markets.

Together, they underpin trading, lending, and cross-border flows that increasingly operate outside traditional banking hours and channels.

The current episode demonstrates that infrastructure growth does not guarantee immediate price appreciation. Stablecoins are expanding as tools for settlement and capital management, even as traders remain cautious about deploying that capital into volatile assets.

For Bitcoin, the implication is clear. The constraint is not a lack of dollars in the system, but a lack of willingness to put those dollars to work.

Until stablecoin flows return to exchanges and funding conditions shift decisively, rallies are likely to face resistance.

In that sense, the recent wave of minting is less a signal of imminent upside than a reflection of a market waiting for clarity.

The post Did minting $3 billion USDT, USDC just help stop Bitcoin losing $60k? appeared first on CryptoSlate.