What to Know: China is intensifying scrutiny on public RWA tokenization to prevent capital flight, favoring permissioned state-run blockchains over open crypto What to Know: China is intensifying scrutiny on public RWA tokenization to prevent capital flight, favoring permissioned state-run blockchains over open crypto

China Tightens Stance On RWA Tokenization While LiquidChain Continues Presale Raise

2026/02/07 00:58
4 min read

What to Know:

  • China is intensifying scrutiny on public RWA tokenization to prevent capital flight, favoring permissioned state-run blockchains over open crypto networks.
  • This regulatory fragmentation increases the need for permissionless interoperability solutions that unify global liquidity outside restrictive jurisdictions.
  • LiquidChain addresses this by fusing Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana into a single execution layer, allowing developers to deploy once and access users everywhere.
  • The LiquidChain presale has raised over $530K at $0.01355, signaling strong market demand for infrastructure that solves cross-chain friction.

The divergence between Eastern and Western approaches to digital assets, specifically Real World Assets (RWA), is widening. Fast. Recent signaling from the People’s Bank of China and agencies like the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Public Security points to a renewed crackdown on ‘public’ tokenization. This reinforces the firewall between Beijing’s permissioned blockchain garden and the open, permissionless crypto economy.

While Hong Kong courts Web3 innovation with sandbox environments, mainland regulators are reportedly eyeing RWA platforms that touch public chains like Ethereum with suspicion. The real worry is capital flight.

Beijing sees permissionless RWA, tokenized bonds, real estate, or commodities, as a backdoor in its capital control regime. If a Shanghai investor can buy a tokenized US Treasury bill on-chain, the firewall is breached.

Consequently, the narrative is shifting toward ‘compliant, permissioned tokenization’ solely on state-sanctioned infrastructure like the Blockchain-based Service Network (BSN), effectively banning public crypto for settlement.

That forces a bifurcation in global liquidity. We’re seeing a ‘Splinternet’ of value: a closed, state-run intranet in China, and a chaotic, high-efficiency internet of value everywhere else.

For global DeFi, this tightening highlights the need for infrastructure that’s resilient, decentralized, and capable of unifying liquidity outside restrictive jurisdictions. As nations build walls, the crypto market funds bridges. That architectural demand is driving attention toward interoperability protocols like LiquidChain ($LIQUID), which is quietly absorbing capital in its ongoing presale.

Unified L3 Architecture Solves The Silo Problem

The core issue here is fragmentation. Whether it’s caused by regulatory firewalls or technical incompatibilities, fractured liquidity kills efficiency. When assets get trapped on one chain, or within one country’s digital borders, slippage spikes and the user experience degrades.

The market’s response? A pivot toward Layer 3 (L3) infrastructure designed specifically as connective tissue.

LiquidChain steps in as a dedicated ‘Cross-Chain Liquidity Layer.’ Unlike traditional bridges that wrap assets (often creating honeypots for hackers), LiquidChain uses a Cross-Chain VM (Virtual Machine) to fuse execution environments. It merges Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana into a single interface.

For developers, this is a ‘deploy-once’ architecture. Instead of writing separate smart contracts for the EVM (Ethereum) and SVM (Solana), they deploy on LiquidChain, and the protocol handles the asynchronous state changes across the underlying chains.

That technical nuance matters. In a market where regulators are trying to choke off entry points, protocols that abstract away the underlying chain complexity offer the path of least resistance.

LiquidChain isn’t just moving tokens; it’s creating a unified settlement layer where a user’s Bitcoin can serve as liquidity for a Solana app without complex hopping. The data suggests smart money is betting on this convergence thesis rather than the siloed approach favored by state actors.

FIND OUT MORE FROM THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDCHAIN WEBSITE

LiquidChain Presale Data Signals Appetite For Infrastructure

While macro headlines obsess over government bans and ETF flows, the venture capital cycle is rotating back into deep infrastructure. Speculative meme coins are flashy, sure, but the ‘picks and shovels’ plays are where long-term conviction settles. LiquidChain’s current presale performance reflects this shift toward utility-driven value.

According to the latest internal data, LiquidChain has raised $526,615.32, with the token currently priced at $0.01355. Raising over half a million dollars ($530K) during a period of regulatory uncertainty in major markets implies that investors are pricing in the success of cross-chain interoperability. The value proposition is clear: LiquidChain solves the ‘fragmented liquidity’ problem plaguing the current L1/L2 landscape.

Frankly, the tokenomics support a long-term hold thesis. By positioning $LIQUID as the fuel for this unified execution environment, the protocol captures value from every cross-chain interaction. It could be one of the best crypto to watch.

As users stake liquidity to secure the network, the floating supply constricts. The risk here (as with any presale) is execution; delivering a mainnet that handles atomic swaps securely is tough. But for investors looking at a price point of $0.01355, the asymmetry lies in the potential for LiquidChain to become the default routing layer for the next generation of DeFi.

BUY YOUR $LIQUID FROM THE PRESALE PAGE

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments, especially presales, carry high risk and volatility. Always conduct your own due diligence.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16